http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

MIMO–monopulse target localisation for automotive radar

MIMO–monopulse target localisation for automotive radar

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In this study, the authors propose a novel direction of arrival (DoA) estimation algorithm called ‘multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO)–monopulse’ by combining the monopulse approach with MIMO radar. Monopulse is fast and accurate angle estimation algorithm, which has been well developed for tracking radar. The application of the monopulse technique on MIMO radar is not much considered before, especially for automotive-radar application, and will be discussed in this study. Conventional methods of monopulse DoA estimation include amplitude and phase comparison monopulse. In this study, to improve the performance of monopulse, they utilise Chebyshev and Zolotarev weighting to synthesise sum and difference patterns. A new visualisation method for monopulse ratio is discussed. Finally, they demonstrate the success of the proposed algorithm by processing real data from a 79 GHz frequency-modulated continuous-wave automotive radar.

References

    1. 1)
      • 1. Winkler, V.: ‘Range Doppler detection for automotive FMCW radars’. Microwave Conf. 2007 European, 2007, pp. 14451448.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Bohme, J.: ‘Estimation of source parameters by maximum likelihood and nonlinear regression’. IEEE Int. Conf. ICASSP'84 Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 9, 1984, pp. 271274.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Jaffer, A.G.: ‘Maximum likelihood direction finding of stochastic sources: a separable solution’. 1988 Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1988 ICASSP-88, 1988, pp. 28932896.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Van Trees, H.L.: ‘Optimum array processing: part IV of detection, estimation, and modulation theory’ (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004).
    5. 5)
      • 5. Schmidt, R.: ‘Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation’, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 1986, 34, (3), pp. 276280.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Roy, R., Kailath, T.: ‘ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques’, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 1989, 37, (7), pp. 984995.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Sherman, S.M., Barton, D.K.: ‘Monopulse principles and techniques’ (Artech House, Norwood, 2011).
    8. 8)
      • 8. Nickel, U.: ‘Overview of generalized monopulse estimation’, IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 2006, 21, (6), pp. 2756.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Gogineni, S., Nehorai, A.: ‘Target tracking using monopulse MIMO radar with distributed antennas’. Radar Conf. 2010, 2010, pp. 194199.
    10. 10)
      • 10. He, Q., He, Z., Li, H.: ‘Multibeam amplitude comparison problems for MIMO radar's angle measurement’. Conf. Record of the 41st Asilomar Conf. Signals, Systems and Computers, 2007 ACSSC 2007, 2007, pp. 21632167.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Zhang, J., Liu, H., Li, J., et al: ‘Research on the mono-pulse phase comparison angle measurement algorithm of MIMO radar’. Int. Workshop Microwave and Millimeter Wave Circuits and System Technology (MMWCST), 2012, pp. 14.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Ito, T., Hirata, K., Takahashi, R.: ‘Transmitting phase comparison monopulse estimation using MIMO radar technique for distributed array’. 2012 Int. Symp. Antennas and Propagation (ISAP), 2012, pp. 7881.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Babur, G., Krasnov, O.A., Yarovoy, A., et al: ‘Nearly orthogonal waveforms for MIMO FMCW radar’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2013, 49, (3), pp. 14261437.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Feng, R., Uysal, F., Yarovoy, A.: ‘Target localisation using MIMO–monopulse: application on 79 GHz automotive radar’. Radar Conf. (EURAD) 2018 European.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Van Veen, B.D., Buckley, K.M.: ‘Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering’, IEEE ASSP Mag., 1988, 5, (2), pp. 424.
    16. 16)
      • 16. An, C., Yang, J., Ran, R., et al: ‘Enhanced monopulse MIMO radar using reliable αβ filtering’. Military Communications Conf. 2012-MILCOM, 2012, pp. 16.
    17. 17)
      • 17. McNamara, D.: ‘Direct synthesis of optimum difference patterns for discrete linear arrays using Zolotarev distributions’, IEEE Proc. H, Microw. Antennas Propag., 1993, 140, (6), pp. 495500.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Willis, A., Baker, C.: ‘Approximation to Zolotarev polynomial ideal difference beams for linear arrays’, Electron. Lett., 2006, 42, (10), pp. 561563.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Seliktar, Y., Williams, D.B., Holder, E.J.: ‘A space/fast-time adaptive monopulse technique’, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., 2006, 2006, (1), p. 014510.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Ito, T., Takahashi, R., Hirata, K.: ‘An antenna arrangement for phase comparison monopulse DOA estimation using nonuniform planar array’. Radar Conf. (EuRAD) 2011 European, 2011, pp. 277280.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Zhuge, X., Yarovoy, A.: ‘Sparse multiple-input multiple-output arrays for high-resolution near-field ultra-wideband imaging’, IET Microw. Antennas Propag., 2011, 5, (13), pp. 15521562.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5013
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5013
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address