Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Specific ship detection for electronic reconnaissance data based on clustering and NNs

Ship detection is an important issue in both civil and military fields. There are many researches about ship detection in wide sea areas and inshore areas. Most of these researches use the image dataset. In this research, a novel framework for specific ship detection using the electronic reconnaissance dataset is proposed. In the new framework, the clustering methods based on time and trajectory are used to process the dataset. Then, several machine-learning methods are used to build detection models. The long short-term memory models are used to extract time-series features and the carefully designed one-dimensional (1D) convolution neural networks (CNNs) are introduced to extract local features. Experimental results on a large electronic reconnaissance dataset collected from real scenario show the model based on 1D CNN gets better performance than classic detection models and the authors’ system achieves a good detection accuracy of 92.5%. Above all, this research is a very valuable exploration for the detection of specific ship based on electronic reconnaissance dataset.

References

    1. 1)
      • 19. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: ‘ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks’. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, USA, December 2012, pp. 10971105.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Shi, Z., Yu, X., Jiang, Z., et al: ‘Ship detection in high-resolution optical imagery based on anomaly detector and local shape feature’, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2014, 52, (8), pp. 45114523.
    3. 3)
      • 22. Pal, M.: ‘Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification’, Int. J. Remote Sens., 2005, 26, (1), pp. 217222.
    4. 4)
      • 18. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: ‘Long short-term memory’, Neural Comput., 1997, 9, (8), pp. 17351780.
    5. 5)
      • 7. Chen, W., Fu, K., Zuo, J., et al: ‘Radar emitter classification for large data set based on weighted-xgboost’, IET Radar Sonar Navig., 2017, 11, (8), pp. 12031207.
    6. 6)
      • 4. Li, W., Fu, K., Sun, H., et al: ‘Integrated localization and recognition for inshore ships in large scene remote sensing images’, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 2017, 14, (6), pp. 936940.
    7. 7)
      • 10. Huang, G., Yuan, Y., Wang, X., et al: ‘Specific emitter identification based on nonlinear dynamical characteristics’, Can. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., 2016, 39, (1), pp. 3441.
    8. 8)
      • 20. Quinlan, J.R.: ‘Induction of decision trees’, Mach. Learn., 1986, 1, (1), pp. 81106.
    9. 9)
      • 15. Lawrence, S., Giles, C.L., Tsoi, A.C., et al: ‘Face recognition: a convolutional neural-network approach’, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 1997, 8, (1), pp. 98113.
    10. 10)
      • 12. Petrov, N., Jordanov, I., Roe, J.: ‘Radar emitter signals recognition and classification with feedforward networks’, Procedia Comput. Sci., 2013, 22, (22), pp. 11921200.
    11. 11)
      • 13. Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J., et al: ‘A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters a density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise’. SIGKDD Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Portland, USA, August 1996, pp. 226231.
    12. 12)
      • 3. Qi, S., Ma, J., Lin, J., et al: ‘Unsupervised ship detection based on saliency and s-hog descriptor from optical satellite images’, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 2015, 12, (7), pp. 14511455.
    13. 13)
      • 16. Graves, A., Jaitly, N., Mohamed, A.: ‘Hybrid speech recognition with deep bidirectional LSTM’. IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Olomouc, Czech Republic, December 2013, pp. 273278.
    14. 14)
      • 5. Eldhuset, K.: ‘An automatic ship and ship wake detection system for spaceborne SAE images in coastal regions’, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 1996, 34, (4), pp. 10101019.
    15. 15)
      • 17. Graves, A., Mohamed, A.R., Hinton, G.: ‘Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks’. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vancouver, Canada, May 2013, pp. 66456649.
    16. 16)
      • 14. Schmidhuber, J.: ‘Deep learning in neural networks: an overview’, Neural Netw., 2015, 61, pp. 85117.
    17. 17)
      • 1. Spezio, A.E.: ‘Electronic warfare systems’, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2002, 50, (3), pp. 633644.
    18. 18)
      • 8. Dudczyk, J.: ‘Radar emission sources identification based on hierarchical agglomerative clustering for large data sets’, J. Sens., 2016, 2016, pp. 19.
    19. 19)
      • 9. Shi, Y., Ji, H.: ‘Kernel canonical correlation analysis for specific radar emitter identification’, Electron. Lett., 2014, 50, (18), pp. 13181320.
    20. 20)
      • 11. Bufler, T.D., Narayanan, R.M.: ‘Radar classification of indoor targets using support vector machines’, IET Radar Sonar Navig.., 2017, 10, (8), pp. 14681476.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Suykens, J.A.K., Vandewalle, J.: ‘Least squares support vector machine classifiers’, Neural Process. Lett., 1999, 9, (3), pp. 293300.
    22. 22)
      • 6. Zak, J., Zavorka, P.: ‘The identification of radar signals by histogram description leads to cluster analysis processing’. 15th Int. Radar Symp. (IRS), Dresden, Germany, 2014, pp. 14.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.0003
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.0003
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address