Your browser does not support JavaScript!

access icon free Coordination of optimal guidance law and adaptive radiated waveform for interception and rendezvous problems

The authors present an algorithm that allows an interceptor aircraft equipped with an airborne radar to meet another air target (the intercepted) by developing a guidance law and automatically adapting and optimising the transmitted waveform on a pulse-to-pulse basis. The algorithm uses a Kalman filter to predict the relative position and speed of the interceptor with respect to the target. The transmitted waveform is automatically selected based on its ambiguity function and accuracy properties along the approaching path. For each pulse, the interceptor predicts its position and velocity with respect to the target, takes a measurement of range and radial velocity and, with the Kalman filter, refines the relative range and range rate estimates. These are fed into a linear quadratic Gaussian controller that ensures the interceptor reaches the target automatically and successfully with minimum error and with the minimum guidance energy consumption.


    1. 1)
      • 8. Farina, A.: ‘Cognitive radar signal processing’. IET Int. Radar Conf. Key Note Speech, Hangzhou, China, 14–16 October 2015.
    2. 2)
      • 7. Nahin, P.J.: ‘Chases and escapes: the mathematics of pursuit and evasion’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton NJ, 2012).
    3. 3)
      • 2. Athans, M.: ‘On optimal allocation and guidance laws for linear interception and rendezvous problems’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1971, AES-7, (5), pp. 843853.
    4. 4)
      • 3. Kershaw, D., Evans, R.: ‘Optimal waveform selection for tracking systems’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1994, 40, (5), pp. 15361550.
    5. 5)
      • 12. Dogandzic, A., Nehorai, A.: ‘Cramér–Rao bounds for estimating range, velocity, and direction with an active array’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2001, 49, (6), pp. 11221137.
    6. 6)
      • 11. Kelly, E.: ‘The radar measurement of range, velocity and direction with an active array’, IRE Trans. Mil. Electron., 1961, ML-5, (2), pp. 5157.
    7. 7)
      • 6. Hlawatsch, F., Boudreaux-Bartels, G.F.: ‘Linear and quadratic time–frequency signal representations’, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 1992, 9, (2), pp. 2167.
    8. 8)
      • 14. Singer, R.A.: ‘Estimating optimal tracking filter performance for manned maneuvering targets’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1970, AES-6, (4), pp. 473483.
    9. 9)
      • 5. Flandrin, P.: ‘Time–frequency of bat sonar signals’, in (EDs.): ‘Animal sonar: processes and performance’ (Springer US, Boston MA, 1998), pp. 797802.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Cook, C.E., Bernfeld, M.: ‘Radar signals: an introduction to theory and application’ (Artech House: Boston London, 1987).
    11. 11)
      • 9. Van Trees, H.L.: ‘Detection, estimation and modulation theory, part III. Radar-sonar signal processing and Gaussian Signals in noise’ (Wiley: New York, 2001).
    12. 12)
      • 13. Balleri, A., Farina, A.: ‘Ambiguity function and accuracy of the hyperbolic chirp: comparison with the linear chirp’. IET Radar Sonar Navig., 2017, 11, (1), pp. 142153, doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0100.
    13. 13)
      • 1. Dissanayake, M.W.M.G., Newman, P., Clark, S., et al: ‘A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM) problem’, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., 2001, 17, (3), pp. 229241.
    14. 14)
      • 4. Baker, C., Griffiths, H., Balleri, A.: ‘Biologically inspired waveform diversity (in waveform design and diversity for advanced radar systems)’, in Gini, F., De Maio, A., Patton, L. (Eds.): ‘Waveform design and diversity for advanced radar systems, Series Radar Sonar Navigation Avionics’ (Institute of Engineering Technology, 2012), pp. 149172.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address