access icon free Commercial vehicle classification from spectrum parted linked image test-attributed synthetic aperture radar imagery

The primitive type attribute as recently reported in the spectrum parted linked image test algorithm is used for the first time in a 10-vehicle classification experiment. Attributed scattering centres (ASCs) from wideband polarimetric synthetic aperture radar imagery are surveyed and two highly complementary sets of attributes are compared in a nearest neighbour classifier. The classifier performance for each set of attributes is shown to be over 90% with 10° sub-apertures and 10 dB additive white Gaussian noise which had not been considered in earlier works. Using a common image formation and ASC extraction method to ensure that only the pixel attributes differed, two different sets of complementary attributes are compared under precisely the same conditions. In addition, the query sets of attributed images are formed from azimuth and elevation angles that are not in the set of training angles. The results show that the classifier performance degrades gracefully as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) decreases below 10 dB and that the sensitivity to aspect angle is nearly the same for all vehicle classes as the SNR approaches 10 dB and above. The primary limitation of the approach is the use of wide-band, wide-aperture, and polarimetric radar data.

Inspec keywords: radar polarimetry; radar imaging; road vehicle radar; AWGN; synthetic aperture radar; image classification; electromagnetic wave scattering

Other keywords: attributed synthetic aperture radar imagery; SNR approach; signal-to-noise ratio; wideband polarimetric synthetic aperture radar imagery; ASC extraction method; additive white Gaussian noise; spectrum parted linked image test algorithm; commercial vehicle classification; query sets; attributed scattering centre

Subjects: Electromagnetic wave propagation; Radar equipment, systems and applications; Optical, image and video signal processing

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 12. Tang, T., Su, Y.: ‘Object recognition based on feature matching of scattering centers in SAR imagery’. 2012 Fifth Int. Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), October 2012, pp. 10731076.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 26. Statnikov, A., Aliferis, C.F., Hardin, D.P., et al: ‘A gentle introduction to support vector machines in biomedicine: case studies’ (World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, USA, 2011, 1st edn.).
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • 31. Dungan, K.E., Austin, C., Nehrbass, J., et al: ‘Civilian vehicle radar data domes’, Proc. SPIE, Algorithms Synth. Aperture Radar Imagery XVII, 2010, 7699, pp. 112.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • 23. Ross, T.D., Bradley, J.J., Hudson, L.J., et al: ‘SAR ATR: So what's the problem? an MSTAR perspective’, Proc. SPIE, Algorithms Synth. Aperture Radar Imagery XVII, 1999, 3721, pp. 662672.
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
      • 28. Ye, J., Janardan, R., Liand, Q.: ‘Two-dimensional linear discriminant analysis’, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2005, 17, pp. 15691576.
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2015.0342
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2015.0342
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading