access icon free Examination of GPS/EGNOS integrity in north-eastern Poland

Integrity of positioning is one of the key aspects of satellite based augmentation systems. This paper presents a study carried out in north-eastern Poland, a region which is considered as a border of the operation of the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) system. Detailed analyses concerning operational parameters of EGNOS were done during the 12-hour and 24-hour measurement sessions conducted at a fixed point. The study was focused on the role of ionospheric delays in the integrity model according to the Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics guidelines. In determination of the accuracy and integrity of positioning, two variants of calculations were adopted: one based on a standard interpolation algorithm determining ionospheric delay by the EGNOS system, and the other based on the Klobuchar model. The research found that the first method is characterised by only slightly better accuracy results, while significant differences were obtained by examining the integrity of positioning. For both variants of the calculation design, the values of protection levels determined for the fixed point are much higher than the positioning accuracy, which meets the integrity requirements of the navigation system.

Inspec keywords: satellite communication; interpolation; Global Positioning System

Other keywords: standard interpolation algorithm; ionospheric delays; Klobuchar model; EGNOS system; satellite based augmentation system; North-Eastern Poland; GPS-European geostationary navigation overlay service integrity

Subjects: Satellite communication systems; Radionavigation and direction finding; Interpolation and function approximation (numerical analysis)

References

    1. 1)
      • 22. Walter, T., Blanch, J., Enge, P.: ‘L5 satellite based augmentation systems protection level equations’. Proc. of the 2007 Int. Symp. on GPS/GNSS, Sydney, Australia, 2007.
    2. 2)
      • 15. Grzegorzewski, M., Ciećko, A., Oszczak, S., Popielarczyk, D.: ‘Autonomous and EGNOS positioning accuracy determination of cessna aircraft on the edge of EGNOS coverage’. Proc. of the 2008 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA, January 2008, pp. 407410.
    3. 3)
      • 17. Azaola-Saenz, M., Cosmen-Shortmann, J.: ‘Autonomous integrity’, Inside GNSS, 2009, 4, pp. 2836.
    4. 4)
      • 11. Jan, S.-S., Chan, W., Walter, T., Enge, P.: ‘MATLAB simulation toolset for SBAS availability analysis’. Proc. of ION GPS, Salt Lake City, UT, 2001, pp. 23662375.
    5. 5)
      • 23. Vassiley, B., Vassileva, B.: ‘EGNOS performance before and after applying an error extraction methodology’, Annu. Navig., 2012, 19, (2), pp. 121130.
    6. 6)
      • 4. Sanz, J., Juan, J.M., Hernandez-Pejares, M., et al: ‘Definition of an SBAS ionospheric activity indicator and its assessment over Europe and Africa during the last solar cycle’. The Int. Beacon Satellite Symp. BSS2013, Bath, 2013.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 13. Sakai, T., Matsunaga, K., Hoshinoo, K.: ‘Improving availability of ionospheric corrections in the low magnetic latitude region’. Proc. of the 2005 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA, 2005, pp. 569579.
    9. 9)
      • 16. Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Transportation: ‘2010 Federal Radionavigation Plan’, 2010, Springfield, Virginia.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 26. International Civil Aviation Organization: ‘ICAO standards and recommended practices (SARPS), Annex10 volume I (Radio navigation aids)’, 2006.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 9. Popielarczyk, D., Templin, T.: ‘Application of integrated GNSS/hydroacoustic measurements and GIS geodatabase models for bottom analysis of Lake Hancza: the deepest inland reservoir in Poland’, Pure Appl. Geophys., 2013, doi: 10.1007/s00024-013-0683-9.
    15. 15)
      • 12. Jan, S.-S., Walter, T., Enge, P.: ‘Techniques for graceful reversion from dual to single frequency WAAS’. Proc. of ION GPS, Salt Lake City, 2003.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 14. Sakai, T., Matsunaga, K., Hoshinoo, K., Walter, T.: ‘Prototype of satellite-based augmentation system and evaluation of the ionospheric correction algorithms’. Proc. of the 2006 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Monterey, CA, 2006, pp. 368379.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • 21. Tiberius, C., Odijk, D.: ‘Does the HPL bound the HPE?’. NAVITEC, Proc. of NaviTec'08 Workshop, ESA-Estec, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2008.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • 1. European Commission, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry: ‘EGNOS open service definition document’, 2014, v 2.1.
    23. 23)
      • 19. Radio Technical Committee for Aeronautics: ‘Minimum operational performance standards for airborne equipment using global positioning system/wide area augmentation system’, 2006, DOC. DO-229D.
    24. 24)
      • 2. Allien, A., Taillander, C., Capo, C., et al: ‘User guide for EGNOS application development’ (ESA, 2009).
    25. 25)
      • 27. European satellite services provider, EGNOS user support’, http://egnos-user-support.essp-sas.eu/egnos_ops/data_gaps?sid=26438, accessed February 2013.
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 5. Jensen, A.B., Mitchell, C.: ‘GNSS and the ionosphere’, GPS World, 2011, 22, (2), pp. 4042.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2015.0053
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2015.0053
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading