Radar detection based on compound-Gaussian model with inverse gamma texture

Access Full Text

Radar detection based on compound-Gaussian model with inverse gamma texture

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The coherent radar detection against a background of compound-Gaussian clutter with inverse gamma texture is studied and three detectors: One-step generalised likelihood ratio test (1S-GLRT), maximum a posteriori GLRT (MAP-GLRT) and two-step GLRT (2S-GLRT) are proposed. The detectors have the same structure with their test statistics and modified thresholds, respectively, related to the scale and the shape parameters of the texture, which can also be formulated in a matched filter (MF) form. Subsequently, the performance assessments are given by their probability of detection and probability of false alarm. The authors find that the probability of false alarm is dependent on the shape parameter, meaning the detectors have no CFAR property. When the shape parameter and the number of the integrated radar pulses satisfy certain condition, it has no relation with the shape parameter and then the detectors have CFAR property. Finally, simulation results show that: (i) 1S-GLRT and MAP-GLRT have the same performance for fixed probability of false alarm and 2S-GLRT bears slightly bad performance; (ii) the performance of 1S-GLRT is much closer to the adaptive coherence estimator (ACE) and is better than that of the Kelly GLRT and (iii) the 1S-GLRT is robust when parameter estimation errors exist.

Inspec keywords: radar detection; radar clutter; probability; Gaussian processes

Other keywords: two-step generalised likelihood ratio test; matched filter form; detection probability; one-step generalised likelihood ratio test; coherent radar detection; performance assessment; inverse gamma texture; test statistics; false alarm probability; integrated radar pulses; compound-Gaussian clutter; maximum a posteriori generalised likelihood ratio test

Subjects: Signal detection; Radar equipment, systems and applications; Other topics in statistics

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • A. Niknejad .
    4. 4)
      • S.M. Kay . (1998) Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: detection theory.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • Akcakaya, M., Hurtado, M., Nehorai, A.: `MIMO radar detection of targets in compound-Gaussian clutter', Proc. 42nd Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems, and Computers, 2008, p. 208–212.
    10. 10)
      • Farina, A., Gini, F., Greco, M.V., Sangston, K.J.: `Optimum and sub-optimum coherent radar detection in compound-Gaussian clutter: a data-dependent threshold interpretation', Proc. 1996 IEEE National Radar Conf., May 1996, Ann Arbor, MI, p. 160–165.
    11. 11)
      • McWhorter, L.T., Scarf, L.L.: `Adaptive matched subspace detectors and adaptive coherent estimators', Proc. 30th Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers, November 1996, Pacific Grove, CA, p. 1114–1117.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • Maio, A.D., Farina, A., Foglia, G.: `Adaptive radar detection: a bayesian approach', Proc. 2007 IEEE Int. Conf. on Radar System, April 2007, Waltham, MA, p. 624–629.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • Wang, J., Dogandzic, A., Nehorai, A.: `Cramer-Rao bounds for compound-Gaussian clutter and target parameters', Proc. 2005 IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP' 2005), 2005, Philadelphia, PA, p. 1101–1104.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2010.0125
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2010.0125
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading