Robust planning methodology for integration of stochastic generators in distribution grids

Robust planning methodology for integration of stochastic generators in distribution grids

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Renewable Power Generation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The number of distributed generation (DG) units being connected at the low- and medium-voltage level is evermore increasing. Because of the mostly non-dispatchable generation profile of small-scale renewable power sources, grid performance can be ameliorated as well as deteriorated. A traditional mathematical optimisation of techno-economic objectives is elaborated upon. A conservative approach can, however, easily underestimate performance deviations due to the stochastic output of DG. A robust planning methodology is formulated, based on accuracy improving Monte Carlo simulations nested in an evolutionary algorithm. Multiple objectives are pursued to assess proper trade-offs regarding the technical and economical aspects.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • J.D. Kueck , B.J. Kirby . The distribution grid of the future. The Electricity Journal , 78 - 87
    3. 3)
      • International Energy Agency (IEA) ‘Distributed generation in liberalised electricity markets’, Paris, France, 2002.
    4. 4)
      • H.L. Willis . (1997) Power distribution planning book.
    5. 5)
      • IEEE Power Engineering Society: ‘Tutorial on modern heuristic optimization techniques with applications to power systems’,
    6. 6)
      • G. Celli , E. Ghianni , S. Mocci , F. Pilo . A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for the sizing and siting of distributed generation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 2 , 750 - 757
    7. 7)
      • R.M. Ciric , A.P. Feltrin , L.F. Ochoa . Power flow in four-wire distribution networks – general approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 4 , 1283 - 1290
    8. 8)
      • Kersting, W.H.: `Radial distribution test feeders', IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 28 January–1 February 2001,, accessed November 2006.
    9. 9)
      • Flemish regulator for electricity and gas (VREG): ‘Synthetic electricity and gas load profiles of domestic and non-domestic users’,, accessed November 2006.
    10. 10)
      • Haesen, E., Driesen, J., Belmans, R.: `A long-term multi-objective planning tool for distributed energy resources', Power Systems Conf. and Exhib. (PSCE), 29 October–1 November 2006, Atlanta, GA, USA.
    11. 11)
      • E. Zitzler , L. Thiele . Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. , 4 , 257 - 271
    12. 12)
      • Leyland, G.: `Multi-objective optimisation applied to industrial energy problems', 2002, PhD, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
    13. 13)
      • Cardell, J.: `The control and operation of distributed generation in a competitive electric market', Vision 21: Environmental Electric Energy Opportunities for the Next Century, National Science Foundation, 27 April 1998.
    14. 14)
      • Y.C. Ho , D.L. Pepyne . Simple explanation of the no-free-lunch theorem and its implications. J. Optim. Theory Applic.
    15. 15)
      • W.H. Kersting . (2002) Distribution system modeling and analysis.
    16. 16)
      • Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI): ‘Hourly wind data’,, accessed November 2006.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address