access icon free Validating grid-forming capabilities of hybrid power park technologies in future OFTO networks

In recent years, there has been considerable interest in convertor-based generating solutions which to a greater or lesser extent mimic the behaviour of synchronous machines, thus overcoming many of the disadvantages of the existing technologies which are potentially destabilising at high penetration. Such solutions are frequently referred to as grid-forming convertors (GFCs). This study focuses on the application of GFC technologies in offshore windfarms, where installation, maintenance and/or modification of any offshore equipment is very expensive and carries greater commercial risks, requiring extensive testing and confidence building prior to deployment in real applications. This is time consuming and particularly significant for GB and where there are large quantities of offshore generation. Onshore solutions to stability are therefore desirable for off-shore transmission owners (OFTOs), especially, if they could be applied by retrofitting to existing conventional converter plant. Consequently, this study proposes and investigates the performance of hybrid solutions for offshore networks where the conventional STATCOM onshore unit is replaced by alternative options such as synchronous compensator and virtual synchronous machine converter of similar (or appropriate) rating with the aim of achieving grid-forming capability. A laboratory-scale implementation of the proposed control algorithm is also presented with selected validation test results.

Inspec keywords: offshore installations; synchronous machines; static VAr compensators; power convertors; power grids; maintenance engineering; power transmission; power system stability; hybrid power systems; wind power plants; power engineering computing

Other keywords: OFTO networks; offshore networks; grid-forming capability; offshore generation; offshore windfarms; synchronous machines; GFC technologies; grid-forming convertors; offshore equipment; STATCOM onshore unit; virtual synchronous machine converter; converter plant; off-shore transmission owners; grid-forming capabilities; synchronous compensator; hybrid power park technologies

Subjects: Power convertors and power supplies to apparatus; Wind power plants; Power system management, operation and economics; Control of electric power systems; Power electronics, supply and supervisory circuits; Plant engineering, maintenance and safety; Stability in control theory; Synchronous machines; Power engineering computing; Power system control

References

    1. 1)
      • 9. Zhang, L., Harnefors, L., Nee, H.: ‘Power-synchronization control of grid-connected voltage-source converters’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2010, 25, (2), pp. 809820.
    2. 2)
      • 8. ENTSO-E., ‘High Penetration of Power Electronic Interfaced Power Sources’, TG HP draft Technical Report for consultation, July 2019.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Ierna, R., Johnson, A., Marshall, B., et al: ‘Dispatching parameters, strategies and associated algorithm for VSM (virtual synchronous machines) and hybrid grid forming convertors’. 18th Wind Integration Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, October 2019.
    4. 4)
      • 1. ‘GC0100 Consultation’, available at https://www.nationalgrideso.com/codes/grid-code/modifications/gc0100-eu-connection-codes-gb-implementation-mod-1, accessed 28 October 2020.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Yu, M., Ierna, R., Dyśko, A., et al: ‘Performance of hybrid power park technologies in future OFTO networks with the aim to achieve grid-forming capability’. 18th Wind Integration Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, October 2019.
    6. 6)
      • 4. Ierna, R., Pholboon, S., Sumner, M., et al: ‘VSM (virtual synchronous machine) control system design, implementation, performance, models and possible implications for grid codes’. 18th Wind Integration Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, October 2019.
    7. 7)
      • 11. ‘Electricity Ten Year Statement (ETYS)’, available at https://www.nationalgrideso.com/insights/electricity-ten-year-statement-etys, accessed 28 October 2020.
    8. 8)
      • 14. Yu, M., Roscoe, R., Dyśko, A., et al: ‘Instantaneous penetration level limits of non-synchronous devices in the British power system’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2017, 11, (8), pp. 12111217.
    9. 9)
      • 6. Ierna, R., Yu, M., Egea-Àlvarez, A., et al: ‘Enhanced virtual synchronous machine (VSM) control algorithm for hybrid grid forming converters’. 18th Wind Integration Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, October 2019.
    10. 10)
      • 13. Roscoe, A., Yu, M., Ierna, R., et al: ‘VSM (virtual synchronous machine) convertor control model suitable for RMS studies for resolving system operator/owner challenges’. 15th Wind Integration Workshop, Viena, Austria, October 2016.
    11. 11)
      • 10. Brogan, P., Knueppel, T., Elliott, D.: ‘Experience of grid forming power converter control’. 17th Wind Integration Workshop, Stockholm, Sweden, October 2018.
    12. 12)
      • 2. ‘VSM Expert Group’, available at https://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/electricity/codes/grid-code/meetings/vsm-expert-workshop, accessed 28 October 2020.
    13. 13)
      • 16. Yu, M., Roscoe, R., Booth, C., et al: ‘Use of an inertia-less virtual synchronous machine within future power networks with high penetrations of converters’. 2016 Power Systems Computation Conf. (PSCC), Genoa, Italy, June 2016, pp. 17.
    14. 14)
      • 12. ‘GB Grid Code’, available at https://www.nationalgrideso.com/codes/grid-code?code-documents, accessed 28 October 2020.
    15. 15)
      • 7. Sumner, M., Pholboon, S., Ierna, R., et al: ‘VSM (virtual synchronous machine) power quality, harmonic and imbalance performance, design and service prioritisation’. 18th Wind Integration Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, October 2019.
    16. 16)
      • 15. D'Arco, S., Suul, J.A.: ‘Virtual synchronous machines - classification of implementations and analysis of equivalence to droop controllers for microgrids’. 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conf., Grenoble, France, June 2013.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0732
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0732
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading