Following from smaller-scale investigations of grid-forming converter control applied to wind turbines in 2017–2018, this study describes a much larger trial involving an entire wind farm, owned and operated by ScottishPower Renewables. To the authors’ knowledge, this was the first UK converter-connected wind farm to operate in grid-forming mode, and the largest in the world to date. The 23-turbine, 69 MW farm ran in the grid-forming mode for 6 weeks, exploring inertia contributions between H = 0.2 s and H = 8 s. A number of unscheduled frequency disturbances occurred due to interconnector, combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) and other trips, to which un-curtailed turbines were able to respond. In addition, several deliberate tests were carried out. The turbines were able to provide a stable and appropriate response at relatively high inertia levels to the frequency events commonly occurring today. The captured responses stimulated a debate as to whether external damping power might be required in a grid-forming converter, or whether internal damping is sufficient to allow stable and robust power-sharing with parallel devices in all grid event scenarios. Analysis in this study suggests that, practically, internal damping is probably appropriate, and that any deficiency in external damping power can be more than mitigated by reactance and/or droop-slope response-time management in the grid-forming converters.

References

1. 1)
  - 10. National_Grid_ESO: ‘Zero carbon operation of Great Britain's electricity system by 2025’, https://www.nationalgrideso.com/news/zero-carbon-operation-great-britains-electricity-system-2025.
2. 2)
  - 8. Yu, M., Roscoe, A.J., Dyśko, A., et al: ‘Instantaneous penetration level limits of non-synchronous devices in the British power system’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2016, 11, (8), pp. 1211–1217.
3. 3)
  - 3. Roscoe, A., Brogan, P., Elliott, D., et al: ‘Practical experience of operating a grid forming wind park and its response to system events’. 18th Wind Integration Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, 2019, p. 7.
4. 4)
  - 5. Roscoe, A., Yu, M., Dyśko, A., et al: ‘A VSM (virtual synchronous machine) convertor control model suitable for RMS studies for resolving system operator/owner challenges’ (2016).
5. 5)
  - 4. National_Grid_ESO: ‘GC0137: Minimum specification required for provision of virtual synchronous machine (VSM) capability’, https://www.nationalgrideso.com/industry-information/codes/grid-code-old/modifications/gc0137-minimum-specification-required.
6. 6)
  - 1. ENTSO-E: ‘High penetration of power electronic interfaced power sources (HPoPEIPS)’, https://www.entsoe.eu/Documents/Network_codes_documents/Implementation/CNC/170322_IGD25_HPoPEIPS.pdf.
7. 7)
  - 2. Brogan, P., Knueppel, T., Elliott, D., et al: ‘Experience of grid forming power converter control’. 17th Wind Integration Workshop, Stockholm, Sweden, 2019), p. 5.
8. 8)
  - 6. Tayyebi, A., Gross, D., Anta, A., et al: ‘Frequency stability of synchronous machines and grid-forming power converters’, IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron., 2020, 8, (2), p. 15.
9. 9)
  - 7. Roscoe, A.J., Blair, S.M.: ‘Choice and properties of adaptive and tunable digital boxcar (moving average) filters for power systems and other signal processing applications’. IEEE Applied Measurements in Power Systems (AMPS), Aachen, Germany, 2016.
10. 10)
  - 9. National_Grid_ESO: ‘Stability pathfinder RFI’, https://www.nationalgrideso.com/insights/network-options-assessment-noa/network-development-roadmap.

Response of a grid forming wind farm to system events, and the impact of external and internal damping

References

Related content