Modelling and evaluation of the Baseline Energy Consumption and the Key Performance Indicators in Technical University of Cluj-Napoca buildings within a Demand Response programme: a case study
- Author(s): Mihaela Crețu 1 ; Levente Czumbil 1 ; Bogdan Bârgăuan 1 ; Andrei Ceclan 1 ; Alexandru Berciu 1 ; Alexis Polycarpou 2 ; Renato Rizzo 3 ; Dan D. Micu 1
-
-
View affiliations
-
Affiliations:
1:
Electrotechnics and Measurements Department , Technical University of Cluj-Napoca , Cluj-Napoca , Romania ;
2: Electrical Engineering Department , Frederick University , Nicosia , Cyprus ;
3: Electrical Engineering and Information Technology Department , Federico II University of Naples , Italy
-
Affiliations:
1:
Electrotechnics and Measurements Department , Technical University of Cluj-Napoca , Cluj-Napoca , Romania ;
- Source:
Volume 14, Issue 15,
16
November
2020,
p.
2864 – 2875
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0096 , Print ISSN 1752-1416, Online ISSN 1752-1424
Demand response (DR) programmes offer to customers the opportunity to reduce the power peak and the energy consumption in response to a price signal or financial incentive. Typically, the request to reduce peak demands is made for a specific time period on a specific day, which is referred to as a DR event. To predict a reference energy consumption level in case of different buildings or blocks of buildings within the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, this study proposes an artificial intelligence enhanced energy profiling method and a more intuitive yet simple method for baseline determination, easy to understand, which allows all the interested parties to estimate the energy and economy savings after a DR event. Once the baseline electric load profile is established, the aim of this study is to calculate some predefined key performance indicators. The two baseline detection methods are compared with each other as a measure of DR event effectiveness. The study has been conducted to clearly demonstrate the economic and environmental benefits of controlling the aggregated load curve in blocks of buildings within several effectively applied DR programmes.
Inspec keywords: demand side management; educational institutions; pricing; energy consumption; building management systems
Other keywords: DR event effectiveness; baseline determination; baseline electric load profile; Technical University of Cluj-Napoca buildings; baseline energy consumption; baseline detection methods; specific time period; aggregated load curve; reference energy consumption level; economy savings; artificial intelligence enhanced energy profiling method; price signal; predefined key performance indicators; DR programmes; financial incentive; demand response programme
Subjects: Power system management, operation and economics; Buildings (energy utilisation)
References
-
-
1)
-
1. Hong, J., Zhang, X., Shen, Q., et al: ‘A multi-regional based hybrid method for assessing life cycle energy use of buildings: a case study’, J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 148, pp. 760–772.
-
-
2)
-
21. Klobasa, M.: ‘Analysis of demand response and wind integration in Germany's electricity market’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2010, 4, (1), pp. 55–63.
-
-
3)
-
2. Ma, H., Du, N., Yu, S., et al: ‘Analysis of typical public building energy consumption in northern China’, Energy Build., 2017, 136, pp. 139–150.
-
-
4)
-
28. S3C: ‘Guideline how to create a consumption baseline’ (Publisher, 2017), pp. 1–9, S3C project baseline document, available at http://www.s3c-project.eu/Deliverables.html.
-
-
5)
-
30. Waduda, Z., Roystonb, S., Selby, J.: ‘Modelling energy demand from higher education institutions: A case study of the UK’, Appl. Energy, 2019, 233–234, pp. 816–826.
-
-
6)
-
25. Crosbie, T., Short, M., Dawood, M., et al: ‘Demand response in blocks of buildings: opportunities and requirements’, Entrep. Sustainability Issues, 2017, 4, (3), pp. 271–281.
-
-
7)
-
16. Mohammadi, J., Rahimi-Kian, A., Ghazizadeh, M.S.: ‘Aggregated wind power and flexible load offering strategy’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2011, 5, (6), pp. 439–447.
-
-
8)
-
31. Johnson Controls: ‘Understanding the PJM default baseline calculation for economic load response’, 2012, available at http://www.johnsoncontrols.com/.
-
-
9)
-
37. Perevozchikov, I., Brassier, P., Broderick, J., et al: ‘D2.2,’Demonstration scenarios, DR-Bob - horizon 2020 project, No 696114, August 2016, pp. 1–20.
-
-
10)
-
27. Rossetto, N.: ‘Measuring the intangible: an Overview of the methodologies for calculating customer baseline load in PJM’, FSR Energy, Policy Brief, May 2018, 5.
-
-
11)
-
24. Noris, F., Espeche, J. M., Sisinni, M., et al: ‘D2.1 ‘market and stakeholders analysis (UPDATE)’, DR-BoB - Horizon 2020 Project, No 696114, May 2016, pp. 1–66.
-
-
12)
-
17. Heydarian-Forushani, E., Moghaddam, M.P., Sheikh-El-Eslami, M.K., et al: ‘Risk-constrained offering strategy of wind power producers considering intraday demand response exchange’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2014, 5, (4), pp. 1036–1047.
-
-
13)
-
38. Breukers, S., Van Summeren, L., Crosby, T.: ‘Mind the gap when implementing technologies intended to reduce or shift energy consumption in blocks-of-buildings’, Journal Energy & Environment, 2020, 31, (4), pp. 613–633.
-
-
14)
-
26. U.S. Department of Energy: ‘Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them’, February 2006.
-
-
15)
-
33. California, I.S.O.: ‘Business requirements specification, energy storage and distributed energy resources (ESDER)’, Document Version: 1.0, 2016.
-
-
16)
-
41. Boisson, P., Thebault, S., Breukers, S., et al: ‘D5.2, ‘evaluation of demonstration sites’, Horizon 2020 project, No 696114, February 2019, pp. 1–189.
-
-
17)
-
18. Guishi, W., Ciobotaru, M., Agelidis, V.G.: ‘Power smoothing of large solar PV plant using hybrid energy storage’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2014, 5, (3), pp. 834–842.
-
-
18)
-
39. AEIC: ‘Demand response measurement&verification’, March 2009, pp. 1–30.
-
-
19)
-
40. Bârgăuan, B., Creţu, M., Micu, D. D., et al: ‘Energy management system for the demand response in TUCN buildings’. Proc. 53rd Int. Universities Power Engineering Conf. (UPEC), Glasgow Scotland, September 2019.
-
-
20)
-
44. Kohonen, T.: ‘Self-organizing maps’, third extended edition, springer series in information sciences vol. 30, Berlin, Germany: springer-verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-67921-9, 2001.
-
-
21)
-
19. Beltran, H., Perez, E., Aparicio, N., et al: ‘Daily solar energy estimation for minimizing energy storage requirements in PV power plants’, IEEE Trans. Sust. Energy, 2013, 4, (2), pp. 474–481.
-
-
22)
-
35. Lindelöf, D., Alisafaee, M., Borso, P., et al: ‘Bayesian evaluation of energy conservation measures: a case study with a model-predictive controller for space heating on a commercial building’, Energy Proc., 2017, 122, pp. 235–240.
-
-
23)
-
45. Darabant, A.S., Darabant, L.: ‘Clustering methods in data fragmentation’, Rom. J. of Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011, 14, (1), pp. 81–97.
-
-
24)
-
7. Fumo, N.: ‘A review on the basics of building energy estimation’, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2014, 31, pp. 53–60.
-
-
25)
-
4. Lin, M., Afshari, A., Azar, E.: ‘A data-driven analysis of building energy use with emphasis on operation and maintenance: a case study from the UAE’, J. Clean. Prod., 2018, 192, pp. 169–178.
-
-
26)
-
13. Crosbie, T., Broderick, J., Short, M., et al: ‘Demand response technology readiness levels for energy management in blocks of buildings’, Buildings, 2018, 8, (13), pp. 1–12.
-
-
27)
-
23. Nadali, M., Shafie-khah, M., Tapan, K.S., et al: ‘Customer-driven demand response model for facilitating roof-top PV and wind power integration’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2017, 11, (9), pp. 1200–1210.
-
-
28)
-
20. Roscoe, A.J., Ault, G.: ‘Supporting high penetrations of renewable generation via implementation of real-time electricity pricing and demand response’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2010, 4, (4), pp. 369–382.
-
-
29)
-
6. Chenglei, H., Kangji, L., Guohai, L., et al: ‘Forecasting building energy consumption based on hybrid PSO-ANN prediction model’. Proc. 34th Chinese Control Conf., Hangzhou, China, July 28–30 2015.
-
-
30)
-
22. Papavasiliou, A., Oren, S.S.: ‘Large-scale integration of deferrable demand and renewable energy sources’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 29, (1), pp. 489–499.
-
-
31)
-
14. Sisinni, M., Noris, F., Smit, S., et al: ‘Identification of value proposition and development of innovative business models for demand response products and services enabled by the DR-BOB solution’, Buildings, 2017, 7, (4), pp. 93–104.
-
-
32)
-
32. KIBERnet project baseline document, available at http://www.kiber-net.com.
-
-
33)
-
48. Power Stream: ‘Time-Of-use (TOU) pricing and schedules’, available at https://www.powerstream.ca/customers/rates-support-programs/time-of-use-pricing.html.
-
-
34)
-
46. Boisson, P., Thebault, S., Rodriguez, S., et al: ‘D5.1, ‘monitoring and validation strategies’, DR-BoB - Horizon 2020 project, No 696114, September 2017, pp. 1–121.
-
-
35)
-
47. Order no. 2641/2017: ‘Perfomance calculation methodology energy of buildings’, 2017.
-
-
36)
-
5. Yoon, Y.R., Moon, H.J.: ‘Energy consumption model with energy use factors of tenants in commercial buildings using Gaussian process regression’, Energy Build., 2018, 168, pp. 215–224.
-
-
37)
-
8. Zhang, Y., Wang, R., Zhang, T., et al: ‘Model predictive control-based operation management for a residential microgrid with considering forecast uncertainties and demand response strategies’, IET Gener., Trans. Distrib., 2016, 10, (10), pp. 2367–2376.
-
-
38)
-
9. Sehar, F., Pipattanasomporn, M., Rahman, S.: ‘An energy management model to study energy and peak power savings from PV and storage in demand responsive buildings’, Appl. Energy, 2016, 173, pp. 406–417.
-
-
39)
-
11. Bordbari, M.J., Seifi, A.R., Rastegar, M.: ‘Probabilistic energy consumption analysis in buildings using point estimate method’, Energy, 2018, 142, pp. 716–722.
-
-
40)
-
43. Rodriguez, S., Broderick, J., Perevozchikov, I., et al: ‘D4.2., ‘installation report’, DR-BoB - Horizon 2020 project, No 696114, September 2017, pp. 1–73.
-
-
41)
-
10. Hakimi, S.M., Hasankhani, A., Shafie-khah, M., et al: ‘Optimal sizing and siting of smart microgrid components under high renewables penetration considering demand response’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2019, 13, (10), pp. 1809–1822.
-
-
42)
-
12. Luzi, M., Vaccarini, M., Lemma, M.: ‘A tuning methodology of model predictive control design for energy efficient building thermal control’, J. Build. Eng., 2019, 21, pp. 28–36.
-
-
43)
-
15. Yulong, J., Zengqiang, M., Yang, Y., et al: ‘Tri-level decision-making framework for strategic trading of demand response aggregator’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2019, 13, (12), pp. 2195–2206.
-
-
44)
-
34. EnerNOC Utility Solutions: ‘Energy baseline methodologies for industrial facilities’, Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, 2013.
-
-
45)
-
29. Ocampo Batlle, E.A., Escobar Palacio, J.C., Electo, E.S., et al: ‘A methodology to estimate baseline energy use and quantify savings in electrical energy consumption in higher education institution buildings: case study, federal university of itajub_a (UNIFEI)’, J. Clean. Prod., 2020, 244, p. 118551.
-
-
46)
-
3. Jing, R., Wang, M., Zhang, R., et al: ‘A study on energy performance of 30 commercial office buildings in Hong Kong’, Energy Build., 2017, 144, pp. 117–128.
-
-
47)
-
36. Chena, Y., Xua, P., Chua, Y., et al: ‘Short-term electrical load forecasting using the support vector regression (SVR) model to calculate the demand response baseline for office buildings’, Appl. Energy, 2017, 195, pp. 659–670.
-
-
48)
-
42. Charlesworth, R.: ‘D2.3, ‘system requirements and technological specifications’, DR-BoB - Horizon 2020 project, No 696114, August 2016, pp. 1–63.
-
-
1)

Related content
