access icon free Impact analysis of large power networks with high share of renewables in transient conditions

With the growth of distributed generators in the power grid, replacing the fossil-fuel-based conventional generation sources with renewable power resources, namely photovoltaics (PVs) or wind turbines, is inevitable. However, when rotating-kind synchronous machines that usually possess high inertia are replaced by PVs that have an inherent static nature, grid stability issues such as reduced system inertia, lack of reactive power, and decreased system damping may arise. This study investigates the stability impacts with high-PV penetration in the Texas 2000-bus network. From the impact analysis conducted under transient conditions, it is observed that high-PV penetration could negatively adversely affect the voltage and frequency stability of the system which is mainly due to the replacement of conventional generators that results in reduced network inertia and lack of reactive power support. Hence, to alleviate the adverse stability implications of PVs on power systems with reduced inertia, a long-term generator scheduling strategy is proposed considering the criticality of synchronous generators for optimally decommitting and scheduling the generators. Extensive case studies are conducted to determine the ideal dispatch strategy for the test system based on transient stability criterions.

Inspec keywords: wind power plants; power grids; power generation dispatch; renewable energy sources; power system transient stability; wind turbines; power system stability; photovoltaic power systems; synchronous generators; power generation scheduling; distributed power generation

Other keywords: distributed generators; adverse stability implications; reactive power support; impact analysis; transient stability criterions; test system; transient conditions; power networks; system damping; synchronous generators; reduced inertia; wind turbines; frequency stability; renewable power resources; Texas 2000-bus network; power grid; fossil-fuel-based conventional generation sources; rotating-kind synchronous machines; long-term generator scheduling strategy; grid stability issues; high-PV penetration; high inertia; power systems; reduced system inertia; inherent static nature; reduced network inertia

Subjects: Solar power stations and photovoltaic power systems; Energy resources; Synchronous machines; Optimisation techniques; Optimisation techniques; Power system management, operation and economics; Control of electric power systems; Distributed power generation; Wind power plants; Power system control

References

    1. 1)
      • 4. Shahnia, F., Ghosh, A., Ledwich, G., et al: ‘Voltage unbalance improvement in low voltage residential feeders with rooftop PVs using custom power devices’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2014, 55, pp. 362377.
    2. 2)
      • 7. Al Abri, R.S., El-Saadany, E.F., Atwa, Y.M.: ‘Optimal placement and sizing method to improve the voltage stability margin in a distribution system using distributed generation’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (1), pp. 326334.
    3. 3)
      • 21. Othman, M.M., Busan, S.: ‘A novel approach of rescheduling the critical generators for a new available transfer capability determination’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2016, 31, (1), pp. 317.
    4. 4)
      • 17. Nguyen, Q., Padullaparti, H.V., Lao, K.-W., et al: ‘Exact optimal power dispatch in unbalanced distribution systems with high PV penetration’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2019, 34, (1), pp. 718728.
    5. 5)
      • 3. Stewart, E.M., Aukai, T.P., MacPherson, S.D.J., et al: ‘A realistic irradiance-based voltage flicker analysis of PV applied to Hawaii distribution feeders’. Proc. IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, CA, 2012, pp. 17.
    6. 6)
      • 20. Eftekharnejad, S., Heydt, G.T., Vittal, V.: ‘Optimal generation dispatch with high penetration of photovoltaic generation’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2015, 6, (3), pp. 10131020.
    7. 7)
      • 36. Miller, N.W., Shao, M., Venkataraman, S.: ‘California ISO (CAISO) frequency response study’. Available at https://www.caiso.com/Documents/Report-FrequencyResponseStudy.pdf/.
    8. 8)
      • 34. ERCOT: ‘2016 long-term system assessment for the ERCOT region’, Texas, 2016. Available at http://www.ercot.com/content/wcm/lists/89476/2016_Long_Term_System_Assessment_for_the_ERCOT_Region.pdf, accessed July 2017.
    9. 9)
      • 33. WECC Modeling and Validation Work Group: ‘Generic solar photovoltaic system dynamic simulation model specification’, Sandia National Laboratories report, September 2012.
    10. 10)
      • 1. IEEE Standard for Interconnecting Distributed Resources with Electric Power Systems, IEEE Std. 1547-2003.
    11. 11)
      • 31. PowerWorld Corporation. Available at http://www.powerworld.com/.
    12. 12)
      • 18. Fan, M., Vittal, V., Heydt, G.T., et al: ‘Probabilistic power flow analysis with generation dispatch including photovoltaic resources’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 17971805.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Susanto, J., Shahnia, F., Ludwig, D.: ‘A framework to technically evaluate integration of utility-scale photovoltaic plants to weak power distribution systems’, Appl. Energy, 2018, 231, pp. 207221.
    14. 14)
      • 11. Eftekharnejad, S., Vittal, V., Heydt, G.T., et al: ‘Impact of increased penetration of photovoltaic generation on power systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 893901.
    15. 15)
      • 23. Rezaeian Koochi, M.H., Esmaeili, S., Fadaeinedjad, R.: ‘New phasor-based approach for online and fast prediction of generators grouping using decision tree’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2017, 11, (6), pp. 15661574.
    16. 16)
      • 8. IEEE Standard for Interconnecting Distributed Resources with Electric Power Systems – Amendment 1’, IEEE Std. 1547a-2014, May 2014, pp. 116.
    17. 17)
      • 2. Delfino, F., Procopio, R., Rossi, M., et al: ‘Integration of large-size photovoltaic systems into the distribution grids: a p-q chart approach to assess reactive support capability’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2010, 4, (4), pp. 329340.
    18. 18)
      • 24. Xu, W., Zhang, y., da Silva, L.C.P., et al: ‘Competitive procurement of dynamic reactive power support service for transmission access’. Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, WA, 2000, pp. 543548.
    19. 19)
      • 12. Wu, Y.K., Ye, G.T., Shaaban, M.: ‘Analysis of impact of integration of large PV generation capacity and optimization of PV capacity: case studies in Taiwan’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2016, 52, (6), pp. 45354548.
    20. 20)
      • 35. EIA: ‘Renewable infrastructure map’. Available at http://www.eia.gov/state/maps.cfm?v=Renewable%20Energy%20Power%20Plants.
    21. 21)
      • 25. Xu, W., Zhang, Y., da Silva, L.C.P., et al:Valuation of dynamic reactive power support services for transmission access’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2001, 16, (4), pp. 719728.
    22. 22)
      • 9. Luo, L., Gu, W., Zhang, X.P., et al: ‘Optimal siting and sizing of distributed generation in distribution systems with PV solar farm utilized as STATCOM’, Appl. Energy, 2018, 210, pp. 10921100.
    23. 23)
      • 29. Fu, C., Bose, A.: ‘Contingency ranking based on severity indices in dynamic security analysis’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1999, 14, (3), pp. 980985.
    24. 24)
      • 30. Birchfield, A.B., Xu, T., Gegner, K.M., et al: ‘Grid structural characteristics as validation criteria for synthetic networks’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2017, 32, (4), pp. 32583265.
    25. 25)
      • 6. Liu, S., Liu, P.X., Wang, X.: ‘Stability analysis of grid-interfacing inverter control in distribution systems with multiple photovoltaic-based distributed generators’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2016, 63, (12), pp. 73397348.
    26. 26)
      • 14. Shah, R., Mithulananthan, N., Bansal, R.C.: ‘Oscillatory stability analysis with high penetrations of large-scale photovoltaic generation’, Energy Convers. Manage., 2013, 65, pp. 420429.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Brandwajn, V., Kumar, A.B.R., Ipakchi, A., et al: ‘Severity indices for contingency screening in dynamic security assessment’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1997, 12, (3), pp. 11361142.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Kamwa, I., Grondin, R., Loud, L.: ‘Time-varying contingency screening for dynamic security assessment using intelligent-systems techniques’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2001, 16, (3), pp. 526536.
    29. 29)
      • 32. NREL. The open PV project. Golden, Colorado. Available at https://openpv.nrel.gov/index, accessed July 2017.
    30. 30)
      • 16. Kumar, D.S., Sharma, A., Srinivasan, D., et al: ‘Stability implications of bulk power networks with large scale PVs’, Energy, 2019, 187, pp. 115.
    31. 31)
      • 22. Khalil, A., Iravani, R.: ‘A dynamic coherency identification method based on frequency deviation signals’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2016, 31, (3), pp. 17791787.
    32. 32)
      • 5. Ebad, M., Grady, W.M.: ‘An approach for assessing high-penetration PV impact on distribution feeders’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2016, 133, pp. 347354.
    33. 33)
      • 10. Achilles, S., Schramm, S., Bebic, J.: ‘Transmission system performance analysis for high-penetration photovoltaics’, New York, 2008. Available at https://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/pdfs/42300.pdf.
    34. 34)
      • 26. Alhasawi, F., Milanovic, J.: ‘Ranking the importance of synchronous generators for renewable energy integration’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 27, pp. 416423.
    35. 35)
      • 19. Fan, M., Sun, K., Lane, D., et al: ‘A novel generation rescheduling algorithm to improve power system reliability with high renewable energy penetration’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2018, 33, (3), pp. 33493357.
    36. 36)
      • 15. Eftekharnejad, S., Vittal, V., Heydt, G.T., et al: ‘Small signal stability assessment of power systems with increased penetration of photovoltaic generation: a case study’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2013, 4, (4), pp. 960967.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.1224
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.1224
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading