Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Renewables integration grid study for the 2030 Japanese power system

This study reports the methodology and results of a renewables (REs) integration grid study for the 2030 Japanese power system. In light of the Japanese energy policy outlook for 2030, two scenarios were compared: the government's target scenario with 22–24% RE penetration (64 GW solar and 10 GW wind), and a scenario with higher RE penetration (100 GW solar and 36 GW wind). The impact of these two RE integration scenarios on the grid in terms of frequency stability and power flows were simulated and compared. The evaluation outcomes showed that a RE penetration more ambitious than the government's plan can be achieved without compromising the evaluated elements of grid security and without additional technical measures in situations with at least up to 62% variable REs, i.e. wind and solar, instantaneous penetration in western Japan and at least up to 36% in eastern Japan. Furthermore, technical solutions like soliciting fast frequency response from solar and wind power plants, and setting a system non-synchronous penetration limit for grid management can be applied to improve grid security for higher RE penetrations.

References

    1. 1)
      • 13. Wakeyama, T.: ‘Impact of increasing share of renewables on the Japanese power system – model based analysis’. 15th Int. Workshop on Large-scale Integration of Wind Power into Power Systems as well as on Transmission Networks for Offshore Wind Power Plants, Vienna, 2016.
    2. 2)
      • 22. Imai, S., Yasuda, T.: ‘UFLS program to ensure stable island operation’. IEEE PES Power Systems Conf. and Exposition, New York, 2004.
    3. 3)
      • 25. OCCTO: ‘OCCTO data’, OCCTO, Tokyo, 2019.
    4. 4)
      • 16. Wakeyama, T.: ‘Evaluating the impacts of priority dispatch rule on RE curtailment in Japan’. 16th Int. Wind Integration Workshop, Berlin, 2017.
    5. 5)
      • 21. ENTSO-E: ‘Future system inertia’, Brussels, 2018.
    6. 6)
      • 15. IEEJ: ‘Japanese power system models’. Available at http://www.iee.jp/pes/?page_id=141, accessed March 2018.
    7. 7)
      • 10. Komiyama, R., Fujii, Y.: ‘National electric power grid model of Japan for assessing massive integration of variable renewable energy’, IEW2018 *37th Edition of Int. Energy Workshop) 4G-Integration of VRE IV, Chalmers Conference Center, June 21, 2018.
    8. 8)
      • 7. Sugiyama, T., Komiyama, R., Fujii, Y.: ‘Optimal power generation mix model considering nationwide high-voltage power grid in Japan for the analysis of large-scale integratin of PV and wind power generation’, IEEJ Trans. Power Energy, 2016, 136, (12), pp. 864875.
    9. 9)
      • 24. OCCTO: ‘Unyouyouryou’, OCCTO, Tokyo, 2019.
    10. 10)
      • 20. Merk, P., Kuwahata, R., Raabe, S., et al: ‘Integrating renewables into the Japanese power grid by 2030’ (Agora Energiewende, Berlin, 2019).
    11. 11)
      • 11. Eirgrid and, S.O.N.I: ‘All island TSO facilitation of renewables studies’, 2010.
    12. 12)
      • 1. ISEP: ‘The share of renewable energy in total power generation in Japan in 2017’, 11 April 2018. Available at https://www.isep.or.jp/en/library/3362, accessed August 2018.
    13. 13)
      • 14. OCCTO: ‘Shuuhasuuseigyo ni taiou shita majin oyobi sonotano majin ni tsuite’, 2016.
    14. 14)
      • 17. Yuji Yamashita, R.S.: ‘Kyushu Electric mulls cutback on solar power’, Asahi Shinbun, 29 August 2018.
    15. 15)
      • 18. ENTSO-E: ‘Definitions of transfer capacities in liberalised electricity markets’, 2001.
    16. 16)
      • 4. FEPC: ‘Electricity statistics information’, 2018. Available at http://www5.fepc.or.jp/tok-bin-eng/kensaku.cgi, accessed August 2018.
    17. 17)
      • 5. METI: ‘Nattoku! Saiseikanou enerugi’, 2018. Available at http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/category/saving_and_new/saiene/statistics/index.html, accessed April 2018.
    18. 18)
      • 9. Komiyama, R., Fujii, Y.: ‘Assessment of post-Fukushima renewable energy policy in Japan's nationwide’, Energy. Policy., 2017, 101, pp. 594611.
    19. 19)
      • 6. Japan Meteorological Agency: ‘Kakushu deta, shiryo (data and material)’, 2018. Available at http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/menu/menureport.html, accessed April 2018.
    20. 20)
      • 3. TEPCO: ‘Download past electricity demand data’, 2018. Available at http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/forecast/html/download-e.html, accessed August 2018.
    21. 21)
      • 12. METI: ‘Long-term energy supply and demand outlook’, 2015.
    22. 22)
      • 2. METI: ‘Strategic energy plan’, July 2018. Available at http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2018/pdf/0703_002c.pdf.
    23. 23)
      • 8. Tsujii, Y., Tsuji, T., Oyama, T., et al: ‘A study on the frequency fluctuation in case of high penetration of renewable energy sources’, IEEJ Trans. Power Energy, 2016, 136, (1), pp. 3343.
    24. 24)
      • 23. Kyushu Electric Power Co: ‘Kyushu Hondo ni okeru Saiene Shutsuryokuyokusei no jisshijoukyou ni tsuite’, 2019.
    25. 25)
      • 19. Merk, P., Kuwahata, R., Raabe, S., et al: ‘2030 nen nihon ni okeru hendou Shizen Enerugi no Tairyoudounyuu to Denryoku Shisutemu no Antei Bunseki’, Japan Renewable Energy Institute, Agora Energiewende, 2019.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.0711
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.0711
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address