Fluctuation of PV array global maximum power point voltage during irradiance transitions caused by clouds

Fluctuation of PV array global maximum power point voltage during irradiance transitions caused by clouds

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Renewable Power Generation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In well-designed photovoltaic (PV) power plants, such as in typical utility-scale PV plants, operational conditions are quite stable and homogeneous apart from the fast irradiance transitions caused by cloud shadings. These partial shading events cause fast power fluctuations leading even to stability and quality problems in power networks. Fast non-homogeneous irradiance transitions cause also mismatch losses in PV generators and the occurrence of multiple maximum power points (MPPs), which appear in a wide voltage range of the PV generator. In consequence, the global MPP can fluctuate in a wide voltage region causing possible MPP tracking problems and power losses. This article presents a study of the behaviour of the global MPP voltage of various PV arrays during irradiance transitions caused by clouds. The global MPP voltage, its rate of change and the differences in voltage and available energy between the global MPP and the MPP with the highest voltage of the PV generators have been analysed comprehensively, for the first time, by using the characteristics of around 8000 measured irradiance transitions. The global MPP voltage was found to vary between 28 and 112% of the nominal MPP voltage of the array.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Esram, T., Chapman, P.L.: ‘Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques’, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2007, 22, (2), pp. 439449.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Eberhart, R., Kennedy, J.: ‘A new optimizer using particle swarm theory’. Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, October 1995, pp. 3943.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Ishaque, K., Salam, Z.: ‘A deterministic particle swarm optimization maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic system under partial shading condition’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2013, 60, (8), pp. 31953206.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Karaboga, D., Ozturk, C.: ‘A novel clustering approach: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm’, Appl. Soft Comput., 2011, 11, (1), pp. 652657.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Sundareswaran, K., Sankar, P., Nayak, P.S.R., et al: ‘Enhanced energy output from a PV system under partial shaded conditions through artificial bee colony’, IEEE Trans. Sust. Energy, 2015, 6, (1), pp. 198209.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Ahmed, N.A., Miyatake, M.: ‘A novel maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic applications under partially shaded insolation conditions’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2008, 78, (5), pp. 777784.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Ishaque, K., Salam, Z.: ‘A review of maximum power point tracking techniques of PV system for uniform insolation and partial shading condition’, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2013, 19, (3), pp. 475488.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Boztepe, M., Guinjoan, F., Velasco-Quesada, G., et al: ‘Global MPPT scheme for photovoltaic string inverters based on restricted voltage window search algorithm’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2014, 61, (7), pp. 33023312.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Furtado, A.M.S., Bradaschia, F., Cavalcanti, M.E., et al: ‘A reduced voltage range global maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2018, 65, (4), pp. 32523262.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Lappalainen, K., Valkealahti, S.: ‘Recognition and modelling of irradiance transitions caused by moving clouds’, Sol. Energy, 2015, 112, (2), pp. 5567.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Tomson, T.: ‘Transient processes of solar radiation’, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 2013, 112, (3), pp. 403408.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Lappalainen, K., Valkealahti, S.: ‘Apparent velocity of shadow edges caused by moving clouds’, Sol. Energy, 2016, 138, (16), pp. 4752.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Lappalainen, K., Valkealahti, S.: ‘Photovoltaic mismatch losses caused by moving clouds’, Sol. Energy, 2017, 158, (18), pp. 455461.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Lappalainen, K., Valkealahti, S.: ‘Output power variation of different PV array configurations during irradiance transitions caused by moving clouds’, Appl. Energy, 2017, 190, (6), pp. 902910.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Mäki, A., Valkealahti, S.: ‘Differentiation of multiple maximum power points of partially shaded photovoltaic power generators’, Renew. Energy, 2014, 71, (11), pp. 8999.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Furtado, A.M.S., Bradaschia, F., Cavalcanti, M.E., et al: ‘Power voltage characteristics and global MPPT algorithms for any severe partial shading condition’, Proc. 2017 Brazilian Power Electronics Conf., Juiz de Fora, Brazil, November 2017,
    17. 17)
      • 17. Mäki, A., Valkealahti, S.: ‘Effect of PV power generator layout on the global MPP voltage range during cloud shading events’. Proc. 28th European photovoltaic solar energy Conf., Paris, France, September 2013, pp. 40634070.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Paraskevadaki, E.V., Papathanassiou, S.A.: ‘Evaluation of MPP voltage and power of mc-Si PV modules in partial shading conditions’, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2011, 26, (3), pp. 923932.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Mäki, A., Valkealahti, S., Leppäaho, J.: ‘Operation of series-connected silicon-based photovoltaic modules under partial shading conditions’, Prog. Photovolt., Res. Appl., 2012, 20, (3), pp. 298309.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Torres Lobera, D., Mäki, A., Huusari, J., et al: ‘Operation of TUT solar PV power station research plant under partial shading caused by snow and buildings’, Int. J. Photoenergy, 2013, 2013, Article ID: 837310, doi:
    21. 21)
      • 21. Belhachat, F., Larbes, C.: ‘Modeling, analysis and comparison of solar photovoltaic array configurations under partial shading conditions’, Sol. Energy, 2015, 120, (10), pp. 399418.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Rakesh, N., Madhavaram, T.V.: ‘Performance enhancement of partially shaded solar PV array using novel shade dispersion technique’, Front. Energy, 2016, 10, (2), pp. 227239.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Villa, L.F.L., Picault, D., Raison, B., et al: ‘Maximizing the power output of partially shaded photovoltaic plants through optimization of the interconnections among its modules’, IEEE J. Photovoltaics, 2012, 2, (2), pp. 154163.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Lappalainen, K., Valkealahti, S.: ‘Mathematical parametrisation of irradiance transitions caused by moving clouds for PV system analysis’. Proc. 32nd European photovoltaic solar energy Conf., Munich, Germany, June 2016, pp. 14851489.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address