Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Quick and oscillation free peak power estimation using SEHC algorithm for single-sensor-based PV-fed battery charging

This study deals with a new version of hill-climbing (HC) algorithm for maximum power peak estimation of the solar photovoltaic (PV) panel, which has self-estimation (SEn) and decision-taking ability. Moreover, it is based on a single sensor, which is applicable for the PV array-fed battery charging. The working principle of Self-Estimated HC (SEHC) algorithm is based on three consecutive operating points on the power-current characteristic. By using perpendicular line analogy (PLA), these points decide direction, and an optimised operating position for next iteration, which is responsible for quick maximum power point tracking as well as improved dynamic performance. Moreover, in every new iteration, the step size is reduced by 90% from the previous step size, which provides an oscillation-free steady-state performance. Owing to a single sensor, the computational burden, as well as calculation complexity of the SEHC algorithm is less, so it can be simply implemented on a cheaper microcontroller. The effectiveness of the proposed technique is validated by MATLAB simulation as well as tested on the experimental prototype. Moreover, the performance of SEHC algorithm is compared with recent state-of-the-art techniques. The highly suitable and satisfactory results of SEHC algorithm show the superiority over the state-of-the-art methods.

References

    1. 1)
      • 16. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘Maximum power extraction from partially shaded PV panel in rainy season by using improved antlions optimization algorithm’. 2016 Seventh Power India Int. Conf. (PIICON), Bikaner, 2016, pp. 16.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Schittekatte, T., Stadler, M., Cardoso, G., et al: ‘The impact of short-term stochastic variability in solar irradiance on optimal microgrid design’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2017, PP, (99), pp. 11, early access.
    3. 3)
      • 27. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘Single sensor based MPPT of partially shaded PV system for battery charging by using Cauchy and Gaussian sine cosine optimization’, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2017, 32, (3), pp. 983992.
    4. 4)
      • 24. Teshome, D.F., Lee, C.H., Lin, Y.W., et al: ‘A modified firefly algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking control under partial shading’, IEEE J. Emerging Sel. Top. Power Electron., 2017, 5, (2), pp. 661671.
    5. 5)
      • 22. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘Peak power detection of PS solar PV panel by using WPSCO’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2017, 11, (4), pp. 480489.
    6. 6)
      • 15. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘Normal harmonic search algorithm based MPPT of solar PV system’. 2016 Seventh IEEE India Int. Conf. Power Electronics, Patiala, 2016, pp. 16.
    7. 7)
      • 3. Das, M., Agarwal, V.: ‘Novel high-performance stand-alone solar PV system with high-gain high-efficiency DC–DC converter power stages’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2015, 51, (6), pp. 47184728.
    8. 8)
      • 7. Elgendy, M.A., Atkinson, D.J., Zahawi, B.: ‘Experimental investigation of the incremental conductance maximum power point tracking algorithm at high perturbation rates’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2016, 10, (2), pp. 133139.
    9. 9)
      • 8. Huynh, D.C., Dunnigan, M.W.: ‘Development and comparison of an improved incremental conductance algorithm for tracking the MPP of a solar PV panel’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2016, 7, (4), pp. 14211429.
    10. 10)
      • 13. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘Maximum power peak detection of partially shaded PV panel by using intelligent monkey king evolution algorithm’. 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Trivandrum, 2016, pp. 16.
    11. 11)
      • 10. Elbaset, A.A., Ali, H., Abd-El Sattar, M., et al: ‘Implementation of a modified perturb and observe maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic system using an embedded microcontroller’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2016, 10, (4), pp. 551560.
    12. 12)
      • 28. Blanes, J.M., Toledo, F.J., Montero, S., et al: ‘In-site real-time photovoltaic I–V curves and maximum power point estimator’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2013, 28, (3), pp. 12341240.
    13. 13)
      • 23. Seyedmahmoudian, M., Rahmani, R., Mekhilef, S., et al: ‘Simulation and hardware implementation of new maximum power point tracking technique for partially shaded PV system using hybrid DEPSO method’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2015, 6, (3), pp. 850862.
    14. 14)
      • 11. Zakzouk, N.E., Elsaharty, M.A., Abdelsalam, A.K., et al: ‘Improved performance low-cost incremental conductance PV MPPT technique’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2016, 10, (4), pp. 561574.
    15. 15)
      • 5. Kjaer, S.B.: ‘Evaluation of the ‘hill climbing’ and the ‘incremental conductance’ maximum power point trackers for photovoltaic power systems’, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2012, 27, (4), pp. 922929.
    16. 16)
      • 29. Wang, J.C., Su, Y.L., Shieh, J.C., et al: ‘High-accuracy maximum power point estimation for photovoltaic arrays’, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2011, 95, pp. 843851.
    17. 17)
      • 14. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘Framework of maximum power extraction from solar PV panel using self predictive perturb and observe algorithm’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2017, PP, (99), pp. 11, early access.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘Single sensor based MPPT for partially shaded solar photovoltaic by using human psychology optimisation algorithm’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2017, 11, (10), pp. 25622574.
    19. 19)
      • 4. Abdelmoaty, A.A., Al-Shyoukh, M., Hsu, Y.C., et al: ‘A MPPT circuit with 25 μW power consumption and 99.7% tracking efficiency for PV systems’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Regul. Pap., 2017, 64, (2), pp. 272282.
    20. 20)
      • 31. Urayai, C., Amaratunga, G.A.J.: ‘Single-sensor maximum power point tracking algorithms’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2013, 7, (1), pp. 8288.
    21. 21)
      • 20. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘MPPT in dynamic condition of partially shaded PV system by using WODE technique’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2017, 8, (3), pp. 12041214.
    22. 22)
      • 33. Babu, C., Gurjar, S.: ‘A novel simplified two-diode model of photovoltaic (PV) module’, IEEE J. Photovolt., 2014, 4, (4), pp. 11561161.
    23. 23)
      • 9. Alajmi, B.N., Ahmed, K.H., Finney, S.J., et al: ‘Fuzzy-logic-control approach of a modified hill-climbing method for maximum power point in microgrid standalone photovoltaic system’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2011, 26, (4), pp. 10221030.
    24. 24)
      • 6. Piegari, L., Rizzo, R.: ‘Adaptive perturb and observe algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2010, 4, (4), pp. 317328.
    25. 25)
      • 21. Lal, V.N., Singh, S.N.: ‘Modified particle swarm optimisation-based maximum power point tracking controller for single-stage utility-scale photovoltaic system with reactive power injection capability’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2016, 10, (7), pp. 899907.
    26. 26)
      • 34. Energy Matters: ‘Deep cycle battery voltage & state of charge’, 2016. Available at http://www.energymatters.com.au/components/battery-voltage-discharge/, accessed 10 November 2016.
    27. 27)
      • 1. Chattopadhyay, S.K., Chakraborty, C.: ‘A new asymmetric multilevel inverter topology suitable for solar PV applications with varying irradiance’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2017, 8, (4), pp. 14961506.
    28. 28)
      • 12. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘Maximum power peak detection of partially shaded PV panel by using intelligent monkey king evolution algorithm’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2017, PP, (99), pp. 11, early access.
    29. 29)
      • 17. Syafaruddin, E.K., Hiyama, T.: ‘Artificial neural network-polar coordinated fuzzy controller based maximum power point tracking control under partially shaded conditions’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2009, 3, (2), pp. 239253.
    30. 30)
      • 32. Moubayed, N., Kouta, J., El-Ali, A., et al: ‘Parameter identification of the lead–acid battery model’. 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., San Diego, CA, USA, 2008, pp. 16.
    31. 31)
      • 19. Mohd Zainuri, M.A.A., Mohd Radzi, M.A., Soh, A.C., et al: ‘Development of adaptive perturb and observe-fuzzy control maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic boost dc–dc converter’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2014, 8, (2), pp. 183194.
    32. 32)
      • 25. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., et al: ‘Rapid MPPT for uniformly and partial shaded PV system by using JayaDE algorithm in highly fluctuating atmospheric conditions’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 2017, 13, (5), pp. 24062416.
    33. 33)
      • 30. Garrigós, A., Blanes, J.M., Carrasco, J.A., et al: ‘Real time estimation of photovoltaic modules characteristics and its application to maximum power point operation’, Renew. Energy, 2007, 32, pp. 10591076.
    34. 34)
      • 26. Sundareswaran, K., Peddapati, S., Palani, S.: ‘Application of random search method for maximum power point tracking in partially shaded photovoltaic systems’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2014, 8, (6), pp. 670678.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0019
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0019
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address