Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Two-stage algorithm for efficient transmission expansion planning with renewable energy resources

In this study, a ‘two-stage’ deterministic algorithm an for efficient transmission expansion planning with renewable energy (RE) resources under the assumption that existing conventional generators provide the reserve to mitigate RE generation forecast error has been proposed. Zero-RE penetration has been considered as a ‘reference scenario’, as well as cost-minimisation objective has been considered as a planning criterion in Stage 1. In the proposed algorithm, Stage 2 is required to be solved only if the network performance degrades in relation to the reference scenario. In Stage 2, congestion cost is also incorporated as a sub-objective. Here, the locational marginal prices of the unit scheduling problem obtained from the solution of Stage 1 have been used to calculate the congestion cost. In addition to being computationally tractable, the proposed algorithm guarantees performance improvement in the network. The planning horizon is divided into smaller blocks to facilitate delayed investment. When implemented on an IEEE 24-bus reliability test system, the proposed algorithm generated minimum cost plan with better performance.

References

    1. 1)
      • 25. Lilienthal, P.: ‘High penetrations of renewable energy for Island grids’ (Power Engineering, 2007).
    2. 2)
      • 21. Orfanos, G.A., Georgilakis, P., Hatziargyriou, N.D.: ‘Transmission expansion planning of systems with increasing wind power integration’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 13551362.
    3. 3)
      • 15. Zhao, Z., Wu, L.: ‘Impacts of high penetration wind generation and demand response on LMPs in day-ahead market’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2014, 5, (1), pp. 220229.
    4. 4)
      • 9. Tor, O.B., Guven, A.N., Shahidehpour, M.: ‘Congestion-driven transmission planning considering the impact of generator expansion’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2008, 23, (2), pp. 781789.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Latorre, G., Cruz, R.D., Areiza, J.M., et al: ‘Classification of publications and models on transmission expansion planning’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2003, 18, (2), pp. 938946.
    6. 6)
      • 19. Gu, Y., McCalley, J.D., Ni, M.: ‘Coordinating large-scale wind integration and transmission planning’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2012, 3, (4), pp. 652659.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Shrestha, G.B., Fonseka, P.A.J.: ‘Congestion-driven transmission expansion in competitive power markets’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2004, 19, (3), pp. 16581665.
    8. 8)
      • 6. Romero, R., Monticelli, A., Garcia, A., et al: ‘Test systems and mathematical models for transmission network expansion planning’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2002, 149, (1), pp. 2736.
    9. 9)
      • 1. Garcés, L.P., Conejo, A.J., Garcia-Bertrand, R., et al: ‘A bilevel approach to transmission expansion planning within a market environment’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2009, 24, (3), pp. 15131522.
    10. 10)
      • 18. Billinton, R., Wangdee, W.: ‘Reliability-based transmission reinforcement planning associated with large-scale wind farms’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2007, 22, (1), pp. 3441.
    11. 11)
      • 14. El-Fouly, T.H.M., Zeineldin, H.H., El-Saadany, E.F., et al: ‘Impact of wind generation control strategies, penetration level and installation location on electricity market prices’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2008, 2, (3), pp. 162169.
    12. 12)
      • 3. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India: ‘Strategic plan for new and renewable energy sector for the period 2011–17’. 2011.
    13. 13)
      • 4. Madrigal, M., Stoft, S.: ‘Transmission expansion for renewable energy scale-up: emerging lessons and recommendations’ (World Bank Publications, 2012).
    14. 14)
      • 13. Lin, J.: ‘Potential impact of solar energy penetration on PJM electricity market’, IEEE Syst. J., 2012, 6, (2), pp. 205212.
    15. 15)
      • 10. Zhao, J.H., Dong, Z.Y., Lindsay, P., et al: ‘Flexible transmission expansion planning with uncertainties in an electricity market’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2009, 24, (1), pp. 479488.
    16. 16)
      • 24. Rahmani, M., Vinasco, G., Rider, M.J., et al: ‘Multistage transmission expansion planning considering fixed series compensation allocation’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (4), pp. 37953805.
    17. 17)
      • 22. Munoz, F.D., Hobbs, B.F., Ho, J.L., et al: ‘An engineering-economic approach to transmission planning under market and regulatory uncertainties: WECC case study’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 29, (1), pp. 307317.
    18. 18)
      • 29. Subcommittee, P.M.: ‘IEEE reliability test system’, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1979, PAS-98, (6), pp. 20472054.
    19. 19)
      • 30. Leyffer, S.: ‘User manual for MINLP BB’. Numerical Analysis Report, University of Dundee, 1999.
    20. 20)
      • 16. Yu, H., Chung, C.Y., Wong, K.P.: ‘Robust transmission network expansion planning method with Taguchi's orthogonal array testing’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (3), pp. 15731580.
    21. 21)
      • 28. Fu, Y., Li, Z.: ‘Different models and properties on LMP calculations’. Proc. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, Quebec, 2006.
    22. 22)
      • 8. Moghaddam, M.P., Abdi, H., Javidi, M.H.: ‘Transmission expansion planning in competitive electricity markets using AC OPF’. Power Systems Conf. and Exposition, 2006. PSCE'06. 2006 IEEE PES, 2006, pp. 15071512.
    23. 23)
      • 31. Drud, A.S.: ‘CONOPT, a large-scale GRG code’, ORSA J. Comput., 1994, 6, (2), pp. 207216.
    24. 24)
      • 23. Cuffe, P., Smith, P., Keane, A.: ‘Transmission system impact of wind energy harvesting networks’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2012, 3, (4), pp. 643651.
    25. 25)
      • 2. Garver, L.L.: ‘Transmission network estimation using linear programming’, IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., 1970, PAS-89, (7), pp. 16881697.
    26. 26)
      • 27. Saaty, T.L.: ‘A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures’, J. Math. Psychol., 1977, 15, (3), pp. 234281.
    27. 27)
      • 36. Zhang, H.: ‘Transmission expansion planning for large power systems’. PhD diss., Arizona State University, 2013.
    28. 28)
      • 32. Brook, A., Kendrick, D., Meeraus, A.: ‘GAMS, a user's guide’, ACM Signum Newsletter, 1988, 23, (3–4), pp. 1011.
    29. 29)
      • 17. Ren, H., Fan, X., Watts, D., et al: ‘Flexible transmission planning considering growing uncertainties from Renewable energy integration’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Power System Technology (POWERCON), 2012, 2012, pp. 16.
    30. 30)
      • 11. Sebastián, D.L.T., Conejo, A.J., Contreras, J.: ‘Transmission expansion planning in electricity markets’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2008, 23, (1), pp. 238248.
    31. 31)
      • 34. Central Electricity Authority: ‘Load generation balance report 2014–15’. http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/yearly/lgbr_report.pdf, accessed June 2014.
    32. 32)
      • 37. Krohn, S., Morthorst, P.E., Awerbuch, S.: ‘The economics of wind energy’ (European Wind Energy Association, 2009).
    33. 33)
      • 20. Khodaei, A., Shahidehpour, M.: ‘Microgrid-based co-optimization of generation and transmission planning in power systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 15821590.
    34. 34)
      • 26. Denholm, P., O'Connell, M., Brinkman, G., et al: ‘Overgeneration from solar energy in California: a field guide to the duck chart’. Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-65023, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, November2015.
    35. 35)
      • 33. National Renewable Energy Laboratory: ‘Offshore_Sites_00002-06996’. http://www.nrel.gov/electricity/transmission/eastern_wind_dataset.html, accessed June 2014.
    36. 36)
      • 12. Morales, J.M., Conejo, A.J., Perez-Ruiz, J.: ‘Simulating the impact of wind production on locational marginal prices’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (2), pp. 820828.
    37. 37)
      • 35. Lange, M.: ‘On the uncertainty of wind power predictions-analysis of the forecast accuracy and statistical distribution of errors’, J. Sol. Energy Eng., 2005, 127, (2), pp. 177184.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0085
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0085
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address