Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Numerical investigation on the hydrodynamic performance of variable length blade tidal turbine: an attribute to enhance energy capture

Numerical investigation on the hydrodynamic performance of variable length blade tidal turbine: an attribute to enhance energy capture

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Renewable Power Generation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In the marine industry, it is important to improve the performance of tida turbines to reduce power generation costs. Modification of existing tidal turbine models is necessary to boost performance. The main objective of the present study is to investigate the hydrodynamic performance of a model variable length blade tidal turbine by modifying the baseline rotor to improve the performance using blade element momentum theory (BEMT). The QBlade BEMT simulation results were validated with the available published data and are in good agreement. Furthermore, the key performance parameters (i.e. thrust, moment, and power coefficient) and power output were predicted using the BEMT code for different blade configurations of the model rotor. The simulation results were compared with a standard conventional fixed blade turbine model. Based on the results from the simulations, with the increase in the rotor blade lengths, the performance parameters, particularly peak power coefficients, were observed to be improved up to 10%. The power extraction was also enhanced up to 79% below-rated tidal velocities without any loss in performance at the rated condition. Hence, the model is more efficient compared to the conventional models.


    1. 1)
      • 30. Goundar, J.N., Ahmed, M.R.: ‘Design of a horizontal axis tidal current turbine’, Appl. Energy, 2013, 111, pp. 161174.
    2. 2)
      • 1. Nicholls-Lee, R.F., Turnock, S.R.: ‘Tidal energy extraction: renewable, sustainable and predictable’, Sci. Prog., 2008, 91, (1), pp. 81111.
    3. 3)
      • 20. Lee, J.H., Kim, D.H., Rhee, S.H., et al: ‘Computational and experimental analysis for horizontal axis marine current turbine design’. Second Int. Symp. on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany, June 2011.
    4. 4)
      • 18. Mccombes, T., Johnstone, C., Grant, A.: ‘Unsteady wake modelling for tidal current turbines’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2011, 5, (4), pp. 299310.
    5. 5)
      • 23. Snel, H., Houwink, R., Bosschers, J.: ‘Sectional prediction of lift coefficients on rotating wind turbine blades in stall’ (Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, Petten, Netherlands1994).
    6. 6)
      • 19. Wiratama, I.K.: ‘Aerodynamic design of wind turbine blades utilising nonconventional control systems’. PhD thesis, Northumbria University, 2012.
    7. 7)
      • 16. Lee, J.H., Park, S., Kim, D.H., et al: ‘Computational methods for performance analysis of horizontal axis tidal stream turbines’, Appl. Energy, 2012, 98, pp. 512523.
    8. 8)
      • 29. Molland, A.F., Bahaj, A.S., Chaplin, J.R., et al: ‘Measurements and predictions of forces, pressures and cavitation on 2-D sections suitable for marine current turbines’, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. M, J. Eng. Marit. Environ., 2004, 218, (2), pp. 127138.
    9. 9)
      • 21. Marten, D., Wendler, J., Pechlivanoglou, G., et al: ‘QBLADE: an open source tool for design and simulation of horizontal and vertical axis wind turbines’, Int. J. Emerging Technol. Adv. Eng., 2013, 3, (3), pp. 264269.
    10. 10)
      • 13. Sharma, R.N., Madawala, U.K.: ‘The concept of a smart wind turbine system’, Renew. Energy, 2012, 39, (1), pp. 403410.
    11. 11)
      • 7. Fraenkel, P.P.: ‘Practical tidal turbine design considerations: a review of technical alternatives and key design decisions leading to the development of the SeaGen 1.2 MW tidal turbine’. Proc. – Fluid Machinery Group-Ocean Power Fluid Machinery Seminar, London, UK, October 2010.
    12. 12)
      • 28. Abbott, I.H., Von Doenhoff, A.E.: ‘Theory of wing sections, including a summary of airfoil data’ (Dover Publication, New York, United States (US), 1959).
    13. 13)
      • 12. McCoy, T., Griffin, D.: ‘Active control of rotor aerodynamics and geometry: statues, methods, and preliminary results’. 44th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2006.
    14. 14)
      • 11. Pasupulati, S.V., Wallace, J., Dawson, M.: ‘Variable length blades wind turbine’. Power Engineering Society General Meeting, June 2005, pp. 20972100.
    15. 15)
      • 4. Rourke, F.O., Boyle, F., Reynolds, A.: ‘Renewable energy resources and technologies applicable to Ireland’, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2009, 13, (8), pp. 19751984.
    16. 16)
      • 2. O'Doherty, T., Mason-Jones, A., O'Doherty, D.M., et al: ‘Experimental and computational analysis of a model horizontal axis tidal turbine’. Eighth European Wave and Tidal Energy Conf. (EWTEC), Uppsala, Sweden, September 2009.
    17. 17)
      • 26. Monteiro, J.P., Silvestre, M.R., Piggott, H., et al: ‘Wind tunnel testing of a horizontal axis wind turbine rotor and comparison with simulations from two blade element momentum codes’, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 2013, 123, (A), pp. 99106.
    18. 18)
      • 27. Michelen, C., Murray, J.C., Neary, V.S., et al: ‘CACTUS open source code for hydrokinetic turbine design and analysis: model performance evaluation and public dissemination as open source design tool’. Proc. of the Second Marine Energy Technology Symp., Seattle, WA, April 2014.
    19. 19)
      • 22. Drela, M.: ‘XFoil: an analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoil aerodynamics’. Conf. on Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Aerodynamics, University of Notre Dame, June 1989.
    20. 20)
      • 24. Viterna, L.A., Corrigan, R.D.: ‘Fixed pitch rotor performance of large horizontal axis wind turbines’. DOE/NASA Workshop on Large Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines, Cleveland, OH, July 1981.
    21. 21)
      • 9. GE Wind Energy, L. L. C.: ‘Advanced wind turbine program next generation turbine development project’ (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado, United States (US), 2006), p. 71.
    22. 22)
      • 15. Lam, W.H., Bhatia, A.: ‘Folding tidal turbine as an innovative concept toward the new era of turbine’, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2013, 28, pp. 463473.
    23. 23)
      • 14. Imraan, M., Sharma, R.N., Flay, R.G.: ‘Wind tunnel testing of a wind turbine with telescopic blades: the influence of blade extension’, Energy, 2013, 53, pp. 2232.
    24. 24)
      • 8. Dawson, M.H., Wallace, J.A.: ‘Telescoping wind turbine blade’. British Patent 7632070, December 2009.
    25. 25)
      • 17. Khan, M.J., Bhuyan, G., Iqbal, M.T., et al: ‘Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: a technology status review’, Appl. Energy, 2009, 86, (10), pp. 18231835.
    26. 26)
      • 25. Hansen, M.O.L.: ‘Aerodynamics of wind turbines’ (Routledge, NY-USA, 2000, 2015, 3rd edn.), pp. 3854.
    27. 27)
      • 6. Esteban, M., Leary, D.: ‘Current developments and future prospects of offshore wind and ocean energy’, Appl. Energy, 2012, 90, (1), pp. 128136.
    28. 28)
      • 3. Singh, P.M., Choi, Y.D.: ‘Shape design and numerical analysis on a 1 MW tidal current turbine for the south-western coast of Korea’, Renew. Energy, 2014, 68, pp. 485493.
    29. 29)
      • 10. Dawson, M.H.: ‘Variable length wind turbine blade’ (Energy Unlimited Inc., 2006), pp. 67.
    30. 30)
      • 5. Ahmed, M.R.: ‘Blade sections for wind turbine and tidal current turbine applications – current status and future challenges’, Int. J. Energy Res., 2012, 36, (7), pp. 829844.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address