access icon free Probabilistic evaluation of available load supply capability of distribution networks as an index for wind turbines allocation

This study deals with placement of wind turbines in distribution networks for maximising the probabilistic index of load supply capability (LSC). To calculate this index, one of the most accurate and efficient probabilistic simulation methods known as Latin hypercube sampling is used. Variations of load and output power of wind turbines are considered in the probabilistic evaluation of LSC. Moreover, the constraints of maximum voltage drop and current carrying capacity of conductors are considered as the limiting factors of the network LSC. Since there is a correlation between the network load and the output power of wind turbines, considering this correlation in simulations will push the results closer to reality. Therefore, the Cholesky decomposition approach is used to take into account the correlation between the input variables of the problem. Casestudiesare carried out on the 33-bus IEEE distribution network. The results of case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

Inspec keywords: wind turbines; distributed power generation; sampling methods; probability; conductors (electric)

Other keywords: LSC; 33-bus IEEE distribution network; Latin hypercube sampling; distribution networks; voltage drop constraints; available load supply capability probabilistic evaluation; probabilistic index; probabilistic simulation methods; conductor current carrying capacity; Cholesky decomposition approach; wind turbine allocation

Subjects: Wind power plants; Distributed power generation; Other topics in statistics

References

    1. 1)
      • 19. Aman, M., Jasmon, G., Bakar, A., et al: ‘A new approach for optimum simultaneous multi-DG distributed generation Units placement and sizing based on maximization of system loadability using HPSO (hybrid particle swarm optimization) algorithm’, Energy, 2014, 66, pp. 202215.
    2. 2)
      • 5. Shaaban, M.F., Atwa, Y.M., El-Saadany, E.F.: ‘A multi-objective approach for optimal DG allocation’. 2nd Int. Conf. on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems (EPECS), Sharjah, 2011, pp. 17.
    3. 3)
      • 2. Hung, D.Q., Mithulananthan, N.: ‘Multiple distributed generator placement in primary distribution networks for loss reduction’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2013, 60, (4), pp. 17001708.
    4. 4)
      • 14. Zhang, S., Cheng, H., Zhang, L., et al: ‘Probabilistic evaluation of available load supply capability for distribution system’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (3), pp. 32153225.
    5. 5)
      • 17. Shu, Z., Jirutitijaroen, P.: ‘Latin hypercube sampling techniques for power systems reliability analysis with renewable energy sources’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (4), pp. 20662073.
    6. 6)
      • 12. Khatod, D.K., Pant, V., Sharma, J.: ‘Evolutionary programming based optimal placement of renewable distributed generators’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 683695.
    7. 7)
      • 13. Wu, D., Li, G., Yang, J., et al: ‘Calculation of load supply capability for distribution networks with distributed generations’. Power and Energy Engineering Conf., Kowloon, December 2013.
    8. 8)
      • 15. Subcommittee, P.: ‘IEEE reliability test system’, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1979, 98, (6), pp. 20472054.
    9. 9)
      • 6. Al Abri, R., El-Saadany, E.F., Atwa, Y.M.: ‘Optimal placement and sizing method to improve the voltage stability margin in a distribution system using distributed generation’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (1), pp. 326334.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Evangelopoulos, V.A., Georgilakis, P.S.: ‘Optimal distributed generation placement under uncertainties based on point estimate method embedded genetic algorithm’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2013, 8, pp. 389400.
    11. 11)
      • 1. Miu, K.N., Chiang, H.D.: ‘Electric distribution system load capability: problem formulation, solution algorithm, and numerical results’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2000, 15, (1), pp. 436442.
    12. 12)
      • 18. Yu, H., Chung, C., Wong, K., et al: ‘Probabilistic load flow evaluation with hybrid latin hypercube sampling and Cholesky decomposition’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2009, 24, (2), pp. 661667.
    13. 13)
      • 16. McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J., Conover, W.J.: ‘Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code’, Technometrics, 1979, 21, pp. 239245.
    14. 14)
      • 3. Zhu, D., Broadwater, R.P., Tam, K.S., et al: ‘Impact of DG placement on reliability and efficiency with time-varying loads’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2006, 21, (1), pp. 419427.
    15. 15)
      • 7. Haghifam, M.-R., Falaghi, H., Malik, O.: ‘Risk-based distributed generation placement’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2008, 2, pp. 252260.
    16. 16)
      • 11. Hadian, A., Haghifam, M.-R., Zohrevand, J., et al: ‘Probabilistic approach for renewable DG placement in distribution systems with uncertain and time varying loads’. Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Calgary, 2009.
    17. 17)
      • 9. Gilani, S.H., Afrakhte, H., Ghadi, M.J.: ‘Probabilistic method for optimal placement of wind-based distributed generation with considering reliability improvement and power loss reduction’. 4th Conf. on Thermal Power Plants (CTPP), Tehran, 2012.
    18. 18)
      • 8. Atwa, Y.M., El-Saadany, E.F.: ‘Probabilistic approach for optimal allocation of wind-based distributed generation in distribution systems’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2011, 5, pp. 7988.
    19. 19)
      • 4. Kotamarty, S., Khushalani, S., Schulz, N.: ‘Impact of distributed generation on distribution contingency analysis’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2008, 78, pp. 15371545.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0350
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0350
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading