Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Improved performance low-cost incremental conductance PV MPPT technique

Improved performance low-cost incremental conductance PV MPPT technique

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Renewable Power Generation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Variable-step incremental conductance (Inc.Cond.) technique, for photovoltaic (PV) maximum power point tracking, has merits of good tracking accuracy and fast convergence speed. Yet, it lacks simplicity in its implementation due to the mathematical division computations involved in its algorithm structure. Furthermore, the conventional variable step-size, based on the division of the PV module power change by the PV voltage change, encounters steady-state power oscillations and dynamic problems especially under sudden environmental changes. In this study, an enhancement is introduced to Inc.Cond. algorithm in order to entirely eliminate the division calculations involved in its structure. Hence, algorithm implementation complexity is minimised enabling the utilisation of low-cost microcontrollers to cut down system cost. Moreover, the required real processing time is reduced, thus sampling rate can be improved to fasten system response during sudden changes. Regarding the applied step-size, a modified variable-step size, which depends solely on PV power, is proposed. The latter achieves enhanced transient performance with minimal steady-state power oscillations around the MPP even under partial shading. For proposed technique's validation, simulation work is carried out and an experimental set up is implemented in which ARDUINO Uno board, based on low-cost Atmega328 microcontroller, is employed.


    1. 1)
      • 42. Website:
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 13. Aghazadeh, H., Kojabadi, H.M., Yazdankhah, A.S.: ‘Stand-alone PV generation system with maximum power point tracking’. Proc. Environment and Electrical Engineering Conf., 2010, pp. 549552.
    4. 4)
      • 11. Pacheco, V.M., Freitas, L.C., Vieira Jr., J.B., et al: ‘Stand-alone photovoltaic energy storage system with maximum power point tracking’. Proc. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf. (APEC), 2003, pp. 97102.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 32. Hart, D.W.: ‘Power electronics handbook’ (McGraw Hill, New York, 2011).
    10. 10)
      • 43. Website:
    11. 11)
      • 17. Azevedo, G.M.S., Cavalcanti, M.C., Oliveira, K.C., et al: ‘Evaluation of maximum power point tracking methods for grid connected photovoltaic systems’. Proc. IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conf., 2008, pp. 14561462.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 22. Liu, B., Duan, S., Liu, F., et al: ‘Analysis and improvement of maximum power point tracking algorithm based on incremental conductance method for photovoltaic array’. Proc. IEEE Power Electronics and Drive Systems Conf., 2007, pp. 637641.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 19. Zhang, X., Zha, L., Liu, F., et al: ‘The analysis of power loss caused by the truncation error of MPPT algorithms’. IEEE Symp. on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG), June 2010, pp. 711.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 16. Qin, S., Wang, M., Chen, T., et al: ‘Comparative analysis of incremental conductance and perturb-and-observation methods to implement MPPT in photovoltaic system’. Proc. IEEE Electrical and Control Engineering Conf. (ICECE), September 2011, pp. 57925795.
    21. 21)
      • 36. Jiang, Y., Abu Qahouq, J., Haskew, T.: ‘Adaptive-step-size with adaptive-perturbation-frequency digital MPPT controller for a single-sensor photovoltaic solar system’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2011, 28, (99), pp. 31953205.
    22. 22)
      • 18. Spiazzi, G., Buso, S., Mattavelli, P., et al: ‘Low complexity MPPT techniques for PV module converters’. Proc. IEEE Power Electronics Conf., June 2010, pp. 20742081.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 20. Adly, M., Ibrahim, M., El Sherif, H.: ‘Comparative study of improved energy generation maximization techniques for photovoltaic systems’. Proc. IEEE Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conf. (APPEEC), March 2012, pp. 15.
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • 24. Menniti, D., Burgio, A., Sorrentino, N., et al: ‘An incremental conductance method with variable step size for MPPT: Design and implementation’. Proc. Electrical Power Quality and Utilization Conf. (EPQU), September 2009, pp. 15.
    27. 27)
      • 30. Ping, W., Hui, D., Changyu, D., et al: ‘An improved MPPT algorithm based on traditional incremental conductance method’. Proc. IEEE Power Electronics Systems and Applications Conf. (PESA), June 2011.
    28. 28)
      • 12. Ingegnoli, A., Iannopollo, A.: ‘A maximum power point tracking algorithm for stand-alone photovoltaic systems controlled by low computational power devices’. Proc. IEEE Mediterranean Electro Technical Conf. (MELECON), 2010, pp. 15221527.
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
      • 15. Faranda, R., Leva, S.: ‘Energy comparison of MPPT techniques for PV systems’, WSEAS Trans. Power Syst., 2008, 3, (6), pp. 446455.
    39. 39)
    40. 40)
    41. 41)
    42. 42)
    43. 43)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address