access icon free Photovoltaic-battery scheme to enhance PV array characteristics in partial shading conditions

Photovoltaic (PV) arrays may be shaded by neighbouring buildings, power lines, trees, clouds, birds, grass and so on. This study begins by discussing the effects of partial shading on PV arrays characteristics and efficiency. It also provides a comparative literature review on methods used to mitigate these effects. Afterwards, this study proposes a novel unit called shading compensation unit (SCU). SCU is intended to alter the PV characteristics of partially shaded arrays to become closer to these of non-shaded ones. Simulations are carried out using MATLAB/Simulink for different shading conditions and temperatures. The results show that SCUs enhance the maximum power of partially shaded arrays by 5–58%. Furthermore, maximum power of partially shaded arrays after adding SCUs is within 85–97% of an unshaded array (without SCUs) which significantly reduces intermittency of PV generation.

Inspec keywords: solar cell arrays; secondary cells

Other keywords: PV array characteristics enhancement; SCU; P–V characteristics; partial shading; photovoltaic-battery scheme; shading compensation unit; PV generation intermittency reduction

Subjects: Secondary cells; Solar cells and arrays; Photoelectric conversion; solar cells and arrays; Secondary cells

References

    1. 1)
      • 29. Yang, M.H., Teo, K.B.K., Milne, W.I., et al: ‘Carbon nanotube schottky diode and directionally dependent field-effect transistor using asymmetrical contacts’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2005, 87, 251104.
    2. 2)
      • 5. Seyedmahmoudian, M., Rahmani, R., Mekhilef, S., et al: ‘Simulation and hardware implementation of new maximum power point tracking technique for partially shaded PV system using hybrid DEPSO method’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2015, PP, (99), pp. 113.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 7. Messenger, R.A., Ventre, J.: ‘Photovoltaic systems engineering’ (CRC Press, Florida, 2004, second edn.), ch. 3, sec. 3, pp. 5255.
    9. 9)
      • 2. Abu-Rub, H.: ‘Power electronics for renewable energy systems, transportation and industrial applications’ (Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2014, first edn.), ch. 7, sec. 2, pp. 164, 166167.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 10. Haberlin, H.: ‘Photovoltaics system design and practice’ (Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2012, first edn.) ch. 4, sec. 2, p. 143.
    12. 12)
      • 26. Salam, Z., Ramli, M.Z.: ‘A simple circuit to improve the power yield of PV array during partial shading’, IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 2012, 15–20 September 2012, pp. 16221626.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 29. Yang, M.H., Teo, K.B.K., Milne, W.I., et al: ‘Carbon nanotube schottky diode and directionally dependent field-effect transistor using asymmetrical contacts’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2005, 87, 251104.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 34. Rastler, D.: ‘Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options’. EPRI Corp., Palo Alto., CA, Rep. 1020676, 2010.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 12. .Villalva, M.G., Gazoli, J.R., Filho, E.R.: ‘Modeling and circuit-based simulation of photovoltaic arrays’. Power Electronics Conf., 2009, COBEP'09.Brazilian, 27 September 2009–1 October 2009, pp. 12441254.
    21. 21)
      • 11. Luque, A., Hegedus, S.: ‘Handbook of photovoltaic science and engineering’ (Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2011, second edn.), ch. 1, sec. 2, pp. 411.
    22. 22)
      • 23. Patnaik, B., Sharma, P., Trimurthulu, E., et al: ‘Reconfiguration strategy for optimization of solar photovoltaic array under non-uniform illumination conditions’. 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf. (PVSC), Seattle, Washington, USA, 2011, 19–24 June 2011, pp. 18591864.
    23. 23)
      • 19. Bellini, A., Bifaretti, S., Iacovone, V.: ‘MPPT algorithm for current balancing of partially shaded photovoltaic modules’. IEEE Int. Symp. on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Bary, Italy, 2010, 4–7 July 2010, pp. 933938.
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • 8. Femia, N.: ‘Power electronics and control techniques for maximum energy harvesting in photovoltaic systems’ (CRC Press, Florida, 2013, first edn.), ch. 1, sec. 3, pp. 1126.
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 9. dos Santos, P., Vicente, E.M., et al: ‘Reconfiguration methodology of shaded photovoltaic panels to maximize the produced energy’. Power Electronics Conf. (COBEP), 2011Brazilian, 11–15 September 2011, pp. 700706.
    28. 28)
      • 15. Farret, F.A., Lenz, J.M., Trapp, J.G.: ‘New methodology to determinate photovoltaic parameters of solar panels’. Power Electronics Conf. (COBEP), 2011Brazilian, 11–15 September 2011, pp. 275279.
    29. 29)
      • 16. Cheng, Z., Pang, Z., Liu, Y., et al: ‘An adaptive solar photovoltaic array reconfiguration method based on fuzzy control’. 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA), Jinan, China, 2010, 7–9 July 2010, pp. 176181.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 28. Gao, L., Dougal, R.A., Shengyi, L., et al: ‘Portable solar systems using a step-up power converter with a fast-speed MPPT and a parallel-configured solar panel to address rapidly changing illumination’. Applied Power Electronics Conf., APEC 2007 – Twenty Second Annual IEEE, Anaheim, California, USA, 25 February 2007–1 March 2007, pp. 520523.
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
      • 22. Lyden, S., Haque, M.E., Gargoom, A., et al: ‘Review of maximum power point tracking approaches suitable for PV systems under partial shading conditions’. Power Engineering Conf. (AUPEC), Hobart, Australia, 2013 Australasian Universities, 29 September 2013–3 October 2013, pp. 16.
    35. 35)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0177
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0177
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading