http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Economic analysis of condition monitoring systems for offshore wind turbine sub-systems

Economic analysis of condition monitoring systems for offshore wind turbine sub-systems

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
$19.95
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Renewable Power Generation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The use of condition monitoring systems on offshore wind turbines has increased dramatically in recent times. However, their use is mostly restricted to vibration based monitoring systems for the gearbox, generator and drive train. A survey of commercially available condition monitoring systems and their associated costs has been completed for the blades, drive train, tower and foundation. This paper considers what value can be obtained from integrating these additional systems into the maintenance plan. This is achieved by running simulations on an operations and maintenance model for a wind farm over a 20 year life cycle. The model uses Hidden Markov Models to represent both the actual system state and the observed condition monitoring state. The CM systems are modelled to include reduced failure types, false alarms, detection rates and 6 month failure warnings. The costs for system failures are derived, as are possible reductions in costs due to early detection. The detection capabilities of the CM systems are investigated and the effects on operational costs are examined. Likewise, the number of failures detected 6 months in advance by the CM systems is modified and the costs reported.

References

    1. 1)
      • 1. Spinato, F., Wilkinson, M., Knowles, M.: ‘Towards the zero maintenance wind turbine’. Proc. of the 41st Universities Power Engineering Conf., 2006, pp. 7478.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 8. Besnard, F., Nilsson, J., Bertling, L.M.: ‘On the economic benefits of using condition monitoring systems for maintenance management of wind power systems’. IEEE 11th Int. Conf. on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, 2010, pp. 160165.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 11. Williams, R., Crabtree, C., Hogg, S.: ‘Quantifying the economic benefits of wind turbine condition monitoring’. Proc. of ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conf. and Exposition, 2014.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 15. Thöns, S., Faber, M.H., Rücker, W.: ‘Optimal design of monitoring systems for risk reduction and operation benefits’, SRESA's Int. J. Life Cycle Reliab. Saf. Eng., 2014, 3, (1), pp. 110.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Thöns, S., McMillan, D.: ‘Condition monitoring benefit for operation support of offshore wind turbines’. Reliability Modeling and Analysis of Smart Power Systems, Springer, 2013, vol. 2 BT - Rel.
    17. 17)
      • 17. May, A., McMillan, D.: ‘Condition based maintenance for offshore wind turbines: the effects of false alarms from condition monitoring systems’. European Safety and Reliability Conf. 2013, 2013.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • 19. Crabtree, C.J.: ‘Survey of commercially available condition monitoring systems for wind turbines’, Durham, 2010.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Feng, Y., Qiu, Y., Crabtree, C.J., et al: ‘Use of SCADA and CMS signals for failure detection and diagnosis of a wind turbine gearbox’. Proc. of EWEA 2011, 2011, p. 6.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Hamilton, A., Quail, F.: ‘Detailed state of the art review for the different online/inline oil analysis techniques in context of wind turbine gearboxes’, J. Tribol., 2011, 133, (4), pp. 18.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Sharma, S., Mahto, D.: ‘Condition monitoring of wind turbines: a review’, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 2013, 4, (8), pp. 3550.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 24. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: ‘Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective’ (John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2012).
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 27. Weiss, A.: ‘Condition monitoring – case histories’. American Wind Energy Association 2012, 2012, p. 9.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 29. Tavner, P.J.: ‘Offshore wind turbines – reliability, availability and maintenance’ (The Institute of Engineering and Technology, 2012, 1st edn.).
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 31. Durstewitz, M., Enßlin, C., Hahn, B., et al: ‘Wind Energy Report, Germany 2005’, Kassel, 2006.
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
      • 33. Noordzee Wind CV: ‘Operations Report 2007’, 2008.
    34. 34)
      • 34. Dinwoodie, I., McMillan, D., Quail, F.: ‘Analysis of offshore wind turbine operation and maintenance using a novel time domain meteo-ocean modeling approach’. ASME Turbo Expo 2012, 2012, pp. 111.
    35. 35)
      • 35. Noordzee Wind CV: ‘Operations Report 2009’, 2010.
    36. 36)
      • 36. Besnard, F.: ‘On maintenance optimization for offshore wind farms’ (Chalmers University of Technology, 2013).
    37. 37)
      • 37. Smith, A.M.: ‘A proven approach’, in reliability-centered maintenance, McGraw-Hill, 1993.
    38. 38)
      • 38. Jardine, A.K.S.: ‘Maintenance, replacement and reliability’ (Pitman Publishing, 1973, 1st edn.).
    39. 39)
      • 39. Bjerkseter, C., Ågotnes, A.: ‘Levelised cost of energy for offshore floating wind turbine concepts’. Masters Thesis, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet (NTNU), 2013.
    40. 40)
      • 40. Martin-Tretton, M., Reha, M., Drunsic, M., et al: ‘Data collection for current U.S. wind energy projects : component costs, financing’. NREL Report, 2012.
    41. 41)
      • 41. Thöns, S., McMillan, D.: ‘Condition monitoring benefit for offshore wind turbines’. 12th Int. Conf. on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, 2012.
    42. 42)
      • 42. General Electric Company: ‘Mod 1 Wind Turbine Generator Failure Modes and Effects Analysis’, 1979.
    43. 43)
      • 43. Bharatbhai, M.G.: ‘Failure mode and effect analysis of repower 5M wind turbine’, Int. J. Adv. Res. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2015, 2, (5), pp. 23942444.
    44. 44)
      • 44. The Crown Estate: ‘A Guide to an Offshore Wind Farm’, 2010.
    45. 45)
    46. 46)
      • 46. GL Garrad Hassan: ‘A Guide to UK Offshore Wind Operations and Maintenance’, 2013.
    47. 47)
      • 47. May, A., McMillan, D., Thöns, S.: ‘Integrating structural health and condition monitoring: a cost benefit for offshore wind energy’. 34th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2015.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0019
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0019
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address