The likelihood of system failure of small systems is investigated in order to establish the risk associated for the investment into a photovoltaic (PV) system for small domestic applications. This is achieved by reviewing existing literature on PV system failure rates and using these as an input for a statistical PV system yield simulation tool that considers failure and repair. It is typically assumed that these systems do not require any maintenance, but it is shown that this will have near catastrophic impact on the energy production of PV systems. The no maintenance is not a likely scenario, as small systems have to register their generation to achieve a feed-in-tariff. In a later stage, when PV is used for self-consumption only, this may change but in the present market most users are forced to carry out a quarterly check and thus this catastrophic failure is avoided by the need of having to apply for the feed-in-tariff. Minimum maintenance strategies for ensuring profitable system operation are investigated and their cost-effectiveness is discussed. It is shown that the present situation where many systems are neither monitored nor is any maintenance carried out results in a high probability of unsuccessful system operation as failure detection may take a very long time. Successful system operation here is defined as not recovering the financial investment. It would be advisable to carry out at least monthly performance checks as otherwise it is likely to have more than 10% energy lost because of system downtime. This requires, however, availability of irradiance data as otherwise it is not possible to identify whether low yields are due to resource issues or really system yield issues.

References

1. 1)
  - 3. Pearsall, N.M., Hynes, K.M., Martin, C., Munzinger, M.: ‘Performance and reliability analysis in the UK photovoltaic domestic systems field trial’. Conf. Record of the 31st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., 2005, pp. 1619–1622.
2. 2)
  - 12. Collins, E., Dvorack, M., Mahn, J., Mundt, M., Quintana, M.: ‘Reliability and availability analysis of a fielded photovoltaic system’. 34th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., 2009, vol. 1–3, pp. 2261–2266.
3. 3)
  - 9. IEA: ‘Performance database. IEA-PVPS Task 2 – operational performance, maintenance and sizing of photovoltaic power systems and subsystems’ (Projekttraeger Juelich, Juelich, 2003, 2003 edn.).
4. 4)
  - 1. Buckley, A., Colantuono, G., Clark, L.: ‘The performance ratio of UK PV microgeneration (2008–2014)’. Proc. 10th Photovoltaic Science, Application and Technology (PVSAT) Conf., Loughborough, 2014, pp. 117–119.
5. 5)
  - 7. Jahn, U., Nasse, W.: ‘Operational performance of grid-connected PV systems on buildings in Germany’, Prog. Photovolt., 2004, 12, pp. 441–448 (doi: 10.1002/pip.550).
6. 6)
  - 14. Sharma, V., Chandel, S.S.: ‘Performance and degradation analysis for long term reliability of solar photovoltaic systems: a review’, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2013, 27, pp. 753–767 (doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.046).
7. 7)
  - 16. Firth, S.K., Lomas, K.J., Rees, S.J.: ‘A simple model of PV system performance and its use in fault detection’, Sol. Energy, 2010, 84, pp. 624–635 (doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2009.08.004).
8. 8)
  - 13. Stember, L.H.: ‘Reliability considerations in the design of solar photo-voltaic power-systems’, Sol. Cells, 1981, 3, pp. 269–285 (doi: 10.1016/0379-6787(81)90008-9).
9. 9)
  - 11. Zini, G., Mangeant, C., Merten, J.: ‘Reliability of large-scale grid-connected photovoltaic systems’, Renew. Energy, 2011, 36, pp. 2334–2340 (doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.036).
10. 10)
  - 15. Kuitche, J.M., Pan, R., TamizhMani, G.: ‘Investigation of dominant failure mode(s) for field-aged crystalline silicon PV modules under desert climatic conditions’, IEEE J. Photovolt., 2014, 4, pp. 814–826 (doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2308720).
11. 11)
  - 8. IEA: ‘Analysis of photovoltaic systems’ (International Energy Agency, Juelich IEA-PVPS T2–01: 2000, 2000).
12. 12)
  - 4. Zhang, P., Li, W., Li, S., Wang, Y., Xiao, W.: ‘Reliability assessment of photovoltaic power systems: review of current status and future perspectives’, Appl. Energy, 2013, 104, pp. 822–833 (doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.010).
13. 13)
  - 17. Meteotest: ‘Meteonorm’, in Meteotest, (Ed.): ‘Meteonorm’ (Meteotest, Bern, 1997).
14. 14)
  - 6. Charki, A., Laronde, R., Bigaud, D.: ‘The time-variant degradation of a photovoltaic system’, Trans. ASME, J. Sol. Energy Eng., 2013, 135, doi:10.1115/1.4007771.
15. 15)
  - 5. Golnas, A.: ‘PV system reliability: an operator's perspective’, IEEE J. Photovolt., 2013, 3, pp. 416–421 (doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2215015).
16. 16)
  - 10. Laukamp, H. (Ed.): ‘Reliability study of grid connected PV systems – field experience and recommended design practive’ (IEA, Freiburg, 2002).
17. 17)
  - 2. Goss, B., Cole, I.R., Betts, T.R., Gottschalg, R.: ‘Irradiance modelling for individual cells of shaded solar photovoltaic arrays’, Sol. Energy, 2014, 110, pp. 410–419 (doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.037).

Energy yields of small grid connected photovoltaic system: effects of component reliability and maintenance

References

Related content