Employing dual scaling mode for adaptive hill climbing method on buck converter

Employing dual scaling mode for adaptive hill climbing method on buck converter

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Renewable Power Generation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

For adaptive hill climbing method, variable stepping is achieved by sizing the change of power over the change of voltage (dP PV/dV PV) and change of power over change of D (dP PV/dD) to appropriate step size using a properly tuned scaling factor. However, the photovoltaic (PV) power versus voltage curve has two different slopes which are the left-hand side of the maximum power point (MPP), and right-hand side of MPP (ROM). The fine-tuned scaling factor for the left-hand side PV slope has good performance at left-hand side of MPP (LOM) but can cause overshoot when system operates at the ROM; while scaling factor properly tuned for the right-hand side PV slope has good performance at ROM but slow voltage response when the system operates at LOM. Dual scaling factor technique is proposed to achieve good performance at LOM and ROM. Besides that, the drawback of implementing hill climbing method on buck converter is discussed, where using constant step size, the hill climbing method has small voltage response at point far from MPP but large voltage response at point near MPP. Based on the results obtained from a lab-scale prototype, it is proven that the proposed method is simple and effective.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 4. Power electronics and control techniques for maximum energy harvesting in photovoltaic systems (Femia, N. et al; 2013) [Book News], vol. 7, no. 3, 2013.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 6. Liu, F., Kang, Y., Zhang, Y., Duan, S.: ‘Comparison of P&O and hill climbing MPPT methods for grid-connected PV converter’. ICIEA Third IEEE Conf. onIndustrial Electronics and Applications, 2008, pp. 804807.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 9. Petrone, G., Spagnuolo, G., Vitelli, M.: ‘TEODI: A new technique for distributed maximum power point tracking PV applications’. IEEE Int. Conf. Industrial Technology (ICIT), 2010, pp. 982987.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 20. Sera, D., Kerekes, T., Teodorescu, R., Blaabjerg, F.: ‘Improved MPPT algorithms for rapidly changing environmental conditions’. 12th Int. Power Electronics and Motion Control Conf., 2006.
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address