Three-dimensional bearing load share behaviour in the planetary stage of a wind turbine gearbox

Three-dimensional bearing load share behaviour in the planetary stage of a wind turbine gearbox

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Renewable Power Generation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The Gearbox Reliability Collaborative has conducted extensive field and dynamometer test campaigns on two heavily instrumented wind turbine gearboxes. In this study, the load sharing behaviour between six bearings in the planetary stage is described using a combined approach of measurement and simulation. First, planet-bearing data are analysed to characterise planetary stage behaviour in different environments. Second, a method is described for integrating the measured responses of the planetary stage into an advanced model of the bearing life that significantly changes the life prediction. Third, a sensitivity study of the planet bearings is conducted using multibody gearbox models. Various levels of gearbox flexibility and different planet assembly fits are investigated and compared with experimental observations. Measurements in the dynamometer and field show that bearing loading differs significantly between the six planet bearings. The relative loading behaviour of the planetary stage bearings is directly influenced by boundary conditions of the planet carrier pins. Assembly differences between two identically designed gearboxes cause different load sharing behaviour. Simulations are used to quantify the effect of different component flexibilities. Reduced order models are developed to accurately predict bearing loading in a cost-efficient manner.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Link, H., LaCava, W., van Dam, J., et al: ‘Gearbox reliability collaborative project report: findings from phase 1 and phase 2 testing.’ (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 2011).
    2. 2)
      • 2. Musial, W., Butterfield, S., McNiff, B.: ‘Improving wind turbine gearbox reliability’. Presented at the Proc. 2007 European Wind Energy Conf. on, 7–10 May 2007.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Oyague, F., Butterfield, C.P., Sheng, S.: ‘Gearbox reliability collaborative analysis round robin’. Prepared for the American Wind Energy Association WINDPOWER 2009 Conf., Golden, CO, 4–7 May 2009, pp. 23.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Rigaud, E., Sabot, J.: ‘Effect of elasticity of shafts, bearings, casing and couplings on the critical rotational speeds of a gearbox’, VDI Berichte, 2007, 1230, pp. 833845.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Xing, Y.H., Karimirad, M., Moan, T.: ‘Effect of spar-type floating wind turbine nacelle motion on drivetrain dynamics’. Proc. European Wind Energy Association, April 2012.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Heege, A., Betran, J., Radvcic, Y.: ‘Fatigue load computation of wind turbine gearboxes by coupled finite element, multi-body system and aerodynamic analysis’, Wind Energy, 2007, 10, (5), pp. 395413 (doi: 10.1002/we.226).
    7. 7)
      • 7. Craig, R.R.: ‘A review of time domain and frequency domain component mode synthesis methods’. Presented at the Joint Mechanics Conf., 1985.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Craig, R.R., Bampton, M.: ‘Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis’, AIAA J., 1968, 6, pp. 13131319 (doi: 10.2514/3.4741).
    9. 9)
      • 9. Oyague, F., Gorman, D., Sheng, S.: ‘NREL gearbox reliability collaborative experimental data overview and analysis’. Presented at the Windpower 2010 Conf. and Exhibition, Golden, CO, 23–26 May.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Seager, D.L.: ‘Load sharing among planet gears’. SAE Paper No. 700178, 1970.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Botman, M.: ‘Epicyclic gear vibrations’, Trans. ASME, 1976, 97, pp. 811815.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Hidaka, T., Terauchi, Y., Dohi, K.: ‘On the relation between the runout errors and the motion of the center of sun gear in a Stoeckicht planetary gear’, Bulletin of the JSME, 1979, 22, pp. 748754 (doi: 10.1299/jsme1958.22.748).
    13. 13)
      • 13. Hidaka, T., Terauchi, Y.: ‘Dynamic behavior of planetary gear (1st report load distribution in planetary gear)’, Bulletin of the JSME, 1976, 19, pp. 6906983 (doi: 10.1299/jsme1958.19.690).
    14. 14)
      • 14. Singh, A.: ‘Load sharing behavior in epicyclic gears: physical explanation and generalized formulation’, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2009, 45, pp. 511530 (doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.10.009).
    15. 15)
      • 15. Singh, A.: ‘Epicyclic load sharing map – development and validation’, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2011, 46, (5), pp. 632646 (doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.01.001).
    16. 16)
      • 16. Ligata, H., Kahraman, A., Singh, A.: ‘An experimental study of the influence of manufacturing errors on the planetary gear stresses and planet load sharing’, J. Mech. Des., 2009, 130, pp. 041701.
    17. 17)
      • 17. LaCava, W., McNiff, B., van Dam, J.: ‘NREL gearbox reliability collaborative: comparing in-field gearbox response to different dynamometer test conditions’. Presented at WINDPOWER 2011 on, Golden, CO, 23–25 May 2011.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Oyague, F.: ‘Gearbox reliability collaborative (GRC) description and loading. NREL/TP-5000-47773’ (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 2011).
    19. 19)
      • 19. van Dam, J.: ‘Gearbox reliability collaborative bearing calibration. NREL/TP-5000-47852’ (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 2011).
    20. 20)
      • 20. ANSI/AGMA 6123-BXX: ‘Design manual for enclosed epicyclic gear drives’ (American Gear Manufacturers Association, 2006).
    21. 21)
      • 21. ISO 6336-1:2010: ‘Calculation of load capacity of spur and helical gears’ (International Organization for Standardization, 2010).
    22. 22)
      • 22. ISO 281:2007(E): ‘Rolling bearings – dynamic load ratings and rating life’ (International Organization for Standardization, 2007).
    23. 23)
      • 23. ISO 16281:2008: ‘Rolling bearings – methods for calculating the modified reference rating life for universally loaded bearings’ (International Organization for Standardization, 2008).
    24. 24)
      • 24. LaCava, W., Xing, Y.H., Guo, Y., Moan, T.: ‘Determining wind turbine gearbox model complexity using measurement validation and cost comparison’. Presented at the European Wind Energy Association 2012, Golden, CO, 16–19 April 2012.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Xing, Y.H., Moan, T.: ‘Multi-body modelling and analysis of a planet carrier in a wind turbine gearbox’ (Wind Energy, 2012).
    26. 26)
      • 26. Heirman, G.H.K., Desmet, W.: ‘Interface reduction of flexible bodies for efficient modeling of body flexibility in multibody dynamics’, Multibody System Dynamics, 2010, 24, (2), pp. 219234 (doi: 10.1007/s11044-010-9198-7).
    27. 27)
      • 27. Timoshenko, S., Gere, J.: ‘Mechanics of materials’ (Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1972).
    28. 28)
      • 28. Helsen, J.: ‘Multibody modeling of varying complexity for modal behavior analysis of wind turbine gearboxes’, Renewable Energy, 2011, 36, pp. 30983113 (doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.023).

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address