Modelling and control of photovoltaic panels utilising the incremental conductance method for maximum power point tracking

Access Full Text

Modelling and control of photovoltaic panels utilising the incremental conductance method for maximum power point tracking

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Renewable Power Generation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

For photovoltaic panels, maximum power point tracking (MPPT) is a crucial process to ensure energy capture is maximised. Various tracking algorithms are available for this purpose. Of these, one of the more common presently implemented is the incremental conductance method. However, no linearised small signal model incorporating an incremental conductance-based MPPT process exists. As will be demonstrated, this is attributed to the formation of a degenerate model when conventional linearisation techniques are applied. In this study, a modelling approach is developed that overcomes this deficiency and permits linearisation of the incremental conductance MPPT algorithm. As a case study adopting this developed approach, a complete small signal dynamic model of the incremental conductance method utilising a boost converter is derived. The model is validated against simulations in PSCAD/EMTDC. This study also presents some applications of the model, such as controller design and stability testing. The results demonstrate that the system is highly robust to variations in the lighting condition.

Inspec keywords: maximum power point trackers; power convertors; linearisation techniques; solar cells

Other keywords: controller design; photovoltaic panel control; stability testing; small signal model; PSCAD-EMTDC; boost converter; conventional linearisation techniques; incremental conductance-based MPPT process; maximum power point tracking

Subjects: Power convertors and power supplies to apparatus; Nonlinear network analysis and design; Solar cells and arrays; Photoelectric conversion; solar cells and arrays; Control of electric power systems

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • Ahmed, E.M., Shoyama, M.: `Stability study of variable step size incremental conductance/impedance MPPT for PV systems', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE ECCE) Jeju, 30 May–3 June 2011, Republic of Korea, p. 386–392.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • Yusof, Y., Sayuti, Y.S.H., Latif, M.A., Wanik, M.Z.C.: `Modeling and simulation of maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic system', Proc. National Power and Energy Conf. (PECon), November 2004, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, p. 88–93.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • Elgendy, M.A., Zahawi, B., Atkinson, D.J.: `Analysis of the performance of DC photovoltaic pumping systems with maximum power point tracking', Proc. IET Conf. on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD), April 2008, York, UK, p. 426–430.
    10. 10)
      • S.P. Chowdhury , P. Crossley , S. Chowdhury , E. Clarke . (2009) Microgrids and active distribution networks.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • R. Erickson , D. Maksimovic . (2000) Fundamentals of power electronics.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • Lee, J.J.: `Modeling and control of photovoltaic panels utilizing the incremental conductance method for maximum power point tracking', M. Eng. report, 2009, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • Xiao, W., Dunford, W.G.: `Evaluating maximum power point tracking performance by using artificial lights', Proc. Conf. on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), November 2004, Vancouver, British Columbia, p. 2883–2887.
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • Venturini, R.P., Scarpa, V.V.R., Spiazzi, G., Buso, S.: `Analysis of limit cycle oscillations in maximum power point tracking algorithms', Proc. IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conf. (PESC), June 2008, Rhodes, Greece, p. 378–384.
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2011.0052
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2011.0052
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading