Sandia frequency shift parameter selection for multi-inverter systems to eliminate non-detection zone

Sandia frequency shift parameter selection for multi-inverter systems to eliminate non-detection zone

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Renewable Power Generation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Among frequency drift islanding detection methods, Sandia frequency shift (SFS) is considered as one of the most effective methods in detecting islanding conditions for grid connected photovoltaic (PV) inverters. The performance of the SFS method during an islanding condition and its non-detection zone (NDZ) depends to a great extent on its parameters. Furthermore, the capability of the SFS method to detect an islanding condition deteriorates with multiple PV inverters. A mathematical formula is derived to aid protection engineers in determining the optimal setting of the SFS islanding detection parameters with multiple inverter-based distributed generation (DG), such as PV systems, to eliminate the NDZ. The derived formula is applied to multiple DG systems equipped with the over frequency/under frequency protection, active frequency drift and SFS islanding detection methods and is verified through NDZ analysis and simulation results on PSCAD/EMTDC. The derived formula provides an effective guideline for designing frequency drift methods in multi-inverter-based DG systems.


    1. 1)
      • IEEE Std. 1547-2003: ‘IEEE standard for interconnecting distributed resources with electric power systems’, July 2003.
    2. 2)
      • IEEE Std. 929-2000: ‘IEEE recommended practice for utility interface of photovoltaic (PV) systems’, April 2000.
    3. 3)
      • IEC 61727: ‘Photovoltaic (PV) systems – characteristics of the utility interface’, December 2004.
    4. 4)
      • Ropp, M., Bower, W.: `Evaluation of islanding detection methods for photovoltaic utility interactive power systems', IEA PVPS T5-09, Technical, March 2002.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Bhandari, R., Gonzalez, S., Ropp, M.E.: `Investigation of two anti-islanding methods in the multi-inverter case', IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, 2008, p. 1–7.
    14. 14)
      • Xue, M., Liu, F., Kang, Y., Zhang, Y.: `Investigation of active islanding detection methods in multiple grid-connected converters', IEEE Sixth Int. Power Electronics and Motion Control Conf., 2009, p. 2151–2154.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • Lasseter, R.H., Paigi, P.: `Microgrid: a conceptual solution', IEEE 35th Power Electronics Specialists Conf., June 2004, 6, p. 4285–4290.
    20. 20)
      • Liang, J., Green, T.C., Weiss, G., Zhong, Q.: `Hybrid control of multiple inverters in an island-mode distribution system', 2003 IEEE 34th Annual Power Electronics Specialist Conf., PESC '03, June 2003, 1, p. 61–66.
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • IEEE Std. 1547.1: ‘IEEE Standard Conformance Test Procedures for Equipment Interconnecting Distributed Resources with Electric Power Systems’, July 2005.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address