Improvement of speed response in four-phase DC–DC converter switching using two shunt voltage-source

Improvement of speed response in four-phase DC–DC converter switching using two shunt voltage-source

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Power Electronics — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study proposes a technique that is able to improve the speed response of a four-phase DC–DC converter switching. The basic concept of the proposed technique is the inclusion of two shunt-connected voltage sources in series to the converter system. Using a higher input voltage to drive the load, a higher current per microsecond output system will be obtained and reverts to its nominal input upon obtaining desired references. Thus, the transient response observed when using this proposed technique is found to be much faster when compared to the conventional converter. Moreover, this technique is easily implemented as it requires only an additional voltage source, power switch, and power diode. The integrated model of the two shunt voltage-source in a four-phase DC–DC converter was simulated in MATLAB/Simulink and validated against the experimental results of a laboratory prototype, 600 W four-phase DC–DC converter. The novelty of this proposed technique is its ability to provide faster operations for critical loads applications, lower output capacitor and lower operating frequency.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Beccuti, G., Kvasnica, M., Papafotiou, G., et al: ‘A decentralized explicit predictive control paradigm for parallelized DC-DC circuits’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2013, 21, (1), pp. 136148.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Cheng, P., Vasic, M., Garcia, O., et al: ‘Minimum time control for multiphase buck converter: analysis and application’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2014, 29, (2), pp. 958967.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Retegui, R.G., Benedetti, M., Funes, M., et al: ‘Current control for high-dynamic high-power multiphase buck converter’, IEEE Trans. Power Electronp, 2012, 27, (2), pp. 614618.
    4. 4)
      • 4. INTEL.: ‘VR12/IMVP7 sVID Protocol Rev. 1.5’ (INTEL, 2010).
    5. 5)
      • 5. Svikovic, V., Cortes, J.J., Alou, P., et al: ‘Multiphase current-Controller buck converter with energy recycling output impedance correction circuit (OICC)’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron, 2015, 30, (9), pp. 52075222.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Yahaya, J.A.F., Rahim, N.A., Mansor, M.: ‘Pulse-width control scheme for fixed-frequency ZVS DC-DC converter with active auxiliary’. 2nd IEEE Conf. Clean Energy & Technology (CEAT), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2013.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Park, S., Choi, S.: ‘Soft-Switched CCM boost converters with high voltage gain for high-power applications’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2010, 25, (5), pp. 12111217.
    8. 8)
      • 8. ‘Multiphase buck converter design responds well to transients’,, accessed September 2016.
    9. 9)
      • 9. ‘High Slew Rate Output ( + HS)’,, accessed September 2016.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Chen, J.-J., Lu, M.-X., Wu, T.-H., et al: ‘Sub-1-V fast-response hysteresis-controlled CMOS buck converter using adaptive ramp techniques’, IEEE Trans. (VLSI) Syst., 2013, 21, (9), pp. 16081618.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Yahaya, J.A.F., Mansor, M.: ‘Model predictive control for current balancing in a four-phase buck converter’, Int. J. Renew. Energy Res., 2016, 6, (2).
    12. 12)
      • 12. Castilla, M., Vicuna, L.G., Guerrero, J.M., et al: ‘Simple low-cost hysteretic controller for single-phase synchronous buck converters’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2007, 22, (4), pp. 12321241.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Capponi, G., Livreri, P., Fabrizio, L., et al: ‘Multiphase voltage regulator module with transient step changing phases’. IEEE Trans, 2000.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Lee, M., Chen, D, Huang, K., et al: ‘Modeling and design for a novel adaptive voltage positioning (AVP) scheme for multiphase VRMs’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2008, 23, (4), pp. 15.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Chen, W.-W., Chen, J.-F., Liang, T.-J., et al: ‘Improved transient response using high-frequency feedback control circuit of the constant current ripple constant on-time with native adaptive voltage positioning design for voltage regulators’, IET Power Electron., 2013, 6, (9), pp. 19481955.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Zhang, K., Luo, S., Wu, T.X., et al: ‘New insights on dynamic voltage scaling of multiphase synchronous buck converter: a comprehensive design consideration’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2014, 29, (4), pp. 19271940.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Lei, W.H., Man, T.K.: ‘A General Approach for optimizing Dynamic Response for Buck Converter’ (ON Semiconductor Application Note, January 2011).
    18. 18)
      • 18. Ridley, R.B.: ‘A new, continuous-time model for current-mode control’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 1991, 6, (2), pp. 271280.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Wildi, T.: ‘Electrical machines, drives, and power systems – sixth edition’ (Pearson Prentice-Hall, 2006).
    20. 20)
      • 20. Hart, D.W.: ‘Power electronics – international edition 2011’ (McGraw-Hill, 2011).
    21. 21)
      • 21. Texas Instruments: ‘Applications Report – Multiphase Buck Design from Start to Finish (Part 1) SLVA882(Texas Instruments, April 2017).
    22. 22)
      • 22. Chen, W.: ‘Application note 77 – high efficiency, high density, poly-phase converters for high current applications’ (Linear Technology, September 1999).

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address