© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Sustainable operation of energy-restrained wireless network services requires multiple objectives to be satisfied synchronously. Among these objectives, reduced spectrum outage, energy conservation, and minimal packet transmission failures considerably affect the energy harvesting operation of these networks. These three objectives are associated with disparate protocol layers incorporating the transport, medium access control, and physical layers of traditional networking architecture. The authors investigate energy harvesting wireless communications by formulating the multi-objective optimisation problem comprising these global networking criteria, which are simultaneously optimised with the heuristic design procedure. For this, they employ a Pareto-based evolutionary genetic algorithm technique built in the wireless network design and operation to find the optimal set of all non-dominated solutions traversing the entire design search space. Besides, iterative implementation of the presented genetic optimisation model with distinct feasible integrations of crossover and mutation operations is performed to evaluate the proficiency of the proposed scheme for evaluating the Pareto-optimal frontier set. The influence of different combinations of these operations is examined and adaptively applied with appropriate genetic parameters tuning for efficient meta-heuristic search through the candidate solution space. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed hybrid genetic mechanism outperforms the existing methods in terms of throughput, energy efficiency, and loss rate.
References
-
-
1)
-
19. Medeiros, V.N., Silvestre, B., Borges, V.: ‘Multi-objective routing aware of mixed IoT traffic for low-cost wireless backhauls’, J. Internet Serv. Appl., 2019, 10, (9), pp. 1–18, doi: 10.1186/s13174-019-0108-9.
-
2)
-
10. Ji, B., Chen, Z., Li, Y., et al: ‘Energy harvesting and information transmission scheme with UAV relay cooperation’, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw., 2019, 2019, (278), pp. 1–9, doi: 10.1186/s13638-019-1598-7.
-
3)
-
2. Björnson, E., Jorswieck, E., Debbah, M., et al: ‘Multiobjective signal processing optimization: the way to balance conflicting metrics in 5G systems’, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng., 2014, 31, (6), pp. 142–148, doi: 10.1109/msp.2014.2330661.
-
4)
-
7. Zhu, K., Wang, F.: ‘Relay selection in energy harvesting cooperative networks with rateless codes’, AIP Conf. Proc., 2018, 1955, (1), p. 040109, doi: 10.1063/1.5033773.
-
5)
-
5. Kumar, R., Kumar, D.: ‘Multi-objective fractional artificial bee colony algorithm to energy aware routing protocol in wireless sensor network’, Wirel. Netw., 2016, 22, (5), pp. 1461–1474, doi: 10.1007/s11276-015-1039-4.
-
6)
-
4. Wu, Y., Liu, W.: ‘Routing protocol based on genetic algorithm for energy harvesting-wireless sensor networks’, IET Wirel. Sensor Syst., 2013, 3, (2), pp. 112–118, doi: 10.1049/iet-wss.2012.0117.
-
7)
-
8)
-
16. Akande, D.O., Salleh, M.F.M.: ‘A multi-objective target-oriented cooperative MAC protocol for wireless ad-hoc networks with energy harvesting’, IEEE Access, 2020, 8, pp. 25310–25325, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970721.
-
9)
-
15. Xu, B., Chen, Y., Carrión, J.R., et al: ‘Resource allocation in energy-cooperation enabled two-tier NOMA HetNets toward green 5G’, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2017, 35, (12), pp. 2758–2770, doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2017.2726398.
-
10)
-
26. Hentati, A., Frigon, J.-F., Ajib, W.: ‘Energy harvesting wireless sensor networks with channel estimation: delay and packet loss performance analysis’, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2020, 69, (2), pp. 1956–1969, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2019.2956038.
-
11)
-
27. Li, K., Ni, W., Abolhasan, M., et al: ‘Reinforcement learning for scheduling wireless powered sensor communications’, IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., 2019, 3, (2), pp. 264–274, doi: 10.1109/TGCN.2018.2879023.
-
12)
-
14. Hao, Y., Peng, L., Lu, H., et al: ‘Energy harvesting based body area networks for smart health’, Sensors, 2017, 17, pp. 1602–1611.
-
13)
-
25. Cheng, H., Wang, C., Zhang, X.: ‘An opportunistic routing in energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks with dynamic transmission power’, IEEE Access, 2019, 7, pp. 180652–180660, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958954.
-
14)
-
11. Chinonso, U.V., Chikezie, N.O.: ‘Efficient energy management technique for optimal resource allocation in a wireless powered communication network’, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 2019, 08, (10), pp. 18–27.
-
15)
-
8. Alsharif, M.H., Kim, S., Kuruoglu, N.: ‘Energy harvesting techniques for wireless sensor networks/radio-frequency identification: a review’, Symmetry, 2019, 11, (7), p. 865.
-
16)
-
13. Mahmoud, H.H., ElAttar, H.M., Saafan, A., et al: ‘Optimal operational parameters for 5G energy harvesting cognitive wireless sensor networks’, IETE Tech. Rev., 2017, 34, (S1), pp. 62–72, doi: 10.1080/02564602.2017.1396938.
-
17)
-
6. Ashraf, N., Asif, W., Qureshi, H.K., et al: ‘Active energy management for harvesting enabled wireless sensor networks’. 13th Annual Conf. on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), Jackson, WY, 2017, pp. 57–60, doi: 10.1109/WONS.2017.7888757.
-
18)
-
21. Ha, T.N., Kha, H.H.: ‘Harvested energy and spectral efficiency trade-offs in multicell MIMO wireless networks’, Radioengineering, 2019, 28, (1), pp. 331–339, doi: 10.13164/re.2019.0331.
-
19)
-
20. Mehta, R., Lobiyal, D.K.: ‘Performance modeling and optimization of multiple-objective cross-layer design in multi-flow ad-hoc networks’, Int. J. Commun. Syst., 2019, 32, p. e3861, doi: 10.1002/dac.3861.
-
20)
-
28. Rappaport, T.S.: ‘Wireless communications: principles and practice’ (Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996).
-
21)
-
23. Silva, R.L.R., Gonçalves, S.T.M., Vollaire, C., et al: ‘Analysis and optimization of ultra-low-power rectifier with high efficiency for applications in wireless power transmission and energy harvesting’, J. Microw., Optoelectron. Electromagn. Appl., 2020, 19, (1), pp. 60–85, doi: 10.1590/2179-10742020v19i11864.
-
22)
-
22. Abdelhady, A.M., Amin, O., Shihada, B., et al: ‘Spectral efficiency and energy harvesting in multi-cell SLIPT systems’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2020, 19, pp. 3304–3318, doi: 10.1109/twc.2020.2972314.
-
23)
-
17. Xu, Y.H., Xie, J.W., Zhang, Y.G., et al: ‘Reinforcement learning (RL)-based energy efficient resource allocation for energy harvesting-powered wireless body area network’, Sensors, 2019, 20, (1), p. 44, doi: 10.3390/s20010044.
-
24)
-
3. Zhang, X.F., Yin, C.C.: ‘Energy harvesting and information transmission protocol in sensors networks’, J. Sens., 2016, 2016, pp. 1–5, .
-
25)
-
24. Ahmed, S., Khan, M.A., Ishtiaq, A., et al: ‘Energy harvesting techniques for routing issues in wireless sensor networks’, Int. J. Grid Util. Comput., 2019, 10, (1), pp. 10–21, doi: 10.1504/IJGUC.2019.097225.
-
26)
-
12. Rabie, K., Adebisi, B., Nauryzbayev, G., et al: ‘Full-Duplex energy-harvesting enabled relay networks in generalized fading channels’, IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., 2019, 8, (2), pp. 384–387, doi: 10.1109/LWC.2018.2873360.
-
27)
-
9. Nasir, A.A., Tuan, H.D., Duong, T.Q., et al: ‘NOMA throughput and energy efficiency in energy harvesting enabled networks’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2019, 67, pp. 6499–6511.
-
28)
-
18. Zogovic, N., Dimic, G., Bajic, D.: ‘PHY-MAC Cross-Layer approach to energy-efficiency and packet-loss trade-off in low-power, low-rate wireless communications’, IEEE Commun. Lett., 2013, 17, (4), pp. 661–664, doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2013.021913.122663.
-
29)
-
1. Haupt, R.L., Haupt, S.E.: ‘Practical genetic algorithms’ (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2004, 2nd edn.).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-net.2020.0093
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-net.2020.0093
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6