Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Directionality-centric bus transit network segmentation for on-demand public transit

The recent growth in real-time, high-capacity ride-sharing has made on-demand public transit (ODPT) a reality. ODPT systems serving passengers using a vehicle fleet that operates with flexible routes, strive to minimise fleet travel distance. Heuristic routing algorithms have been integrated in ODPT systems in order to improve responsiveness. However, route computation time in such algorithms depends on problem complexity and hence increases for large scale problems. Thus, network segmentation techniques that exploit parallel computing have been proposed in order to reduce route computation time. Even though computation time can be reduced using segmentation in existing techniques, it comes at the cost of degradation of route quality due to static demarcation of boundaries and disregarding real road network distances. Thus, this work proposes, a directionality-centric bus transit network segmentation technique that exploits parallel computation capable of computing routes in near real-time while providing high scalability. Additionally, a dynamic fleet allocation algorithm that exploits proximity and flexibility to minimise vehicle detours while maximising fleet utilisation is proposed. Experimental evaluations on a real road network confirm that the proposed method achieves notable speed-up in flexible route computation without compromising route quality compared to a widely used unsupervised learning technique.

References

    1. 1)
      • 9. Saez, D., Cortés, C., Núñez, A.: ‘Hybrid adaptive predictive control for the multivehicle dynamic pick-up and delivery problem based on genetic algorithms and fuzzy clustering’, Comput. Oper. Res., 2008, 35, pp. 34123438.
    2. 2)
      • 13. Comert, S.E., Yazgan, H.R., Kır, S., et al: ‘A cluster first-route second approach for a capacitated vehicle routing problem: a case study’, Int. J. Procurement Manage. (IJPM), 2018, 11, pp. 399419.
    3. 3)
      • 14. Lowalekar, M., Varakantham, P., Jaillet, P.: ‘ZAC: a zone path construction approach for effective real-time ridesharing’. Proc. of the Twenty-Ninth Int. Conf. on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Menlo Park, California, 2019, pp. 98113.
    4. 4)
      • 15. Open Source Routing Machine. ‘OSRM API Documentation’,accessed April 12 2020. Available at https://bit.ly/2XCChvM.
    5. 5)
      • 7. Ioachim, I., Desrosiers, J., Dumas, Y., et al: ‘A request clustering algorithm in door-to-door transportation’, Transp. Sci., 1995, 29, pp. 6378.
    6. 6)
      • 3. Shen, C.W., Quadrifoglio, L.: ‘Evaluating centralized versus decentralized zoning strategies for metropolitan ADA paratransit services’, J. Transp. Eng., 2013, 139, pp. 524532.
    7. 7)
      • 1. Bhutani, A., Saha, P.: ‘Global mobility on-demand market worth $250bn by 2026’. Accessed June 2020. Available at https://bit.ly/2CIHVmZ.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Jorgensen, R., Larsen, J., Bergvinsdottir, K.: ‘Solving the dial-a-ride problem using genetic algorithms’, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 2007, 58, pp. 13211331.
    9. 9)
      • 2. Alonso.Mora, J., Samaranayake, S., Wallar, A., et al: ‘On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2017, 114, (3), pp. 462467.
    10. 10)
      • 6. Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.: ‘Finding groups in data: an Introduction to cluster analysis’ (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA1990).
    11. 11)
      • 4. Quadrifoglio, L., Dessouky, M., Ordóñez, F.: ‘A simulation study of demand responsive transit system design’, Transp. Res. A, Policy Pract., 2008, 42, pp. 718737.
    12. 12)
      • 11. Zheng, H., Chen, J., Zhang, X., et al: ‘Designing a new shuttle service to meet large-scale instantaneous peak demands for passenger transportation in a metropolitan context: a green, low-cost mass transport option’, Sustainability, 2019, 11, (18), https://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/784.
    13. 13)
      • 12. Chen, S., Wang, H., Meng, Q.: ‘Solving the first-mile ridesharing problem using autonomous vehicles’, Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 2020, 35, (1), pp. 4560.
    14. 14)
      • 10. Pelzer, D., Xiao, J., Zehe, D., et al: ‘A partition-based match making algorithm for dynamic ridesharing’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2015, 16, pp. 112.
    15. 15)
      • 5. Perera, T., Prakash, A., Gamage, C.N., et al: ‘Hybrid genetic algorithm for an on-demand first mile transit system using electric vehicles’, In Shi, Y., Fu, H., Tian, Y., et al, (Eds.): ‘Computational science – ICCS 2018’ (Springer International Publishing, Cham), 2018, pp. 98113.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Google Maps Platform. ‘Encoded polyline algorithm format’,accessed September 17 2020. Available at https://bit.ly/2FAqMxC.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2020.0437
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2020.0437
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address