access icon free Novel dual-layer-oriented strategy for fully automated vehicles’ lane-keeping system

A novel concept of a dual-layer-oriented control strategy for fully automated vehicles’ lane-keeping system is proposed which consists of an inner controller with a modified preview driver model and an outer cooperative copilot controller. With designed weighting function of displacement error based on a hyperbolic tangent and adjustable preview horizon according to road geometry, the inner controller is supposed to track the lane centreline precisely and efficiently through optimal control framework. The outer controller is specially designed for situations where the vehicle may run out of the lane and cause a collision. Only when the vehicle is at high risk of lane-crossing, the outer controller is activated to guide the vehicle back to lane centreline by exerting proper steering command, which is calculated by solving a model predictive control-based constrained optimisation problem with a designed quadratic cost function. Finally, simulation tests based on CarSim-Matlab joint platform are carried out to verify the proposed strategy. Results demonstrate that the modified preview driver model is able to improve path following performance and the dual-layer-oriented control strategy with less computational burden can effectively prevent the vehicle from crossing lane boundaries.

Inspec keywords: optimisation; vehicle dynamics; steering systems; road vehicles; optimal control; predictive control; position control; road traffic

Other keywords: dual-layer-oriented control strategy; adjustable preview horizon; lane boundaries; outer cooperative copilot controller; modified preview driver model; designed weighting function; model predictive control-based; outer controller; designed quadratic cost function; dual-layer-oriented strategy; lane centreline; optimal control framework; inner controller; fully automated vehicles; hyperbolic tangent preview horizon; lane-crossing

Subjects: Vehicle mechanics; Road-traffic system control; Optimal control; Optimisation techniques; Spatial variables control

References

    1. 1)
      • 5. Sentouh, C., Nguyen, A., Rath, J.J., et al: ‘Human–machine shared control for vehicle lane keeping systems: a Lyapunov-based approach’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2019, 13, (1), pp. 6371.
    2. 2)
      • 9. Allen, R.W., Rosenthal, T.J., Szostak, H.T.: ‘Analytical modeling of driver response in crash avoidance maneuvering–volume 1: technical background’, NHTSA, DOT HS 807 270, 1988.
    3. 3)
      • 20. MacAdam, C.: ‘Development of a Driver Model for Near/At-Limit Vehicle Handling’, GM Corp., Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan, December, 2001.
    4. 4)
      • 12. Chen, C., Seff, A., Kornhauser, A., et al: ‘Deepdriving: learning affordance for direct perception in autonomous driving’. Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile, 2015, pp. 27222730.
    5. 5)
      • 2. Ma, L., Zong, G., Zhao, X., et al: ‘Observed-based adaptive finite-time tracking control for a class of nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems with input saturation’, J. Franklin Inst., 2020, 357, pp. 1151811544.
    6. 6)
      • 25. Leblanc, D., Johnson, G.E., Venhovens, P.J., et al: ‘CAPC: a road-departure prevention system’, IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 1996, 16, (6), pp. 6171.
    7. 7)
      • 3. Chang, X., Xiong, J., Li, Z., et al: ‘Quantized static output feedback control for discrete-time systems’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 2018, 14, (8), pp. 34263435.
    8. 8)
      • 16. Guo, H., Liu, J., Cao, D., et al: ‘Dual-envelop-oriented moving horizon path tracking control for fully automated vehicles’, Mechatronics. (Oxf), 2017, 50, pp. 422433.
    9. 9)
      • 14. González, D., Pérez, J., Milanéz, V., et al: ‘A review of motion planning techniques for automomated vehicles’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 17, (4), pp. 11351145.
    10. 10)
      • 7. Wang, J.S., Knipling, R.R.: ‘Single Vehicle Roadway Departure Crashes: Problem Size Assessment and Statistical Description’, NHTSA technical report, DOT HS 808 113, March 1994.
    11. 11)
      • 23. Falcone, P., Borrelli, F., Asgari, J., et al: ‘Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2007, 15, pp. 566580.
    12. 12)
      • 4. Chang, X., Liu, Y., Shen, M., et al: ‘Resilient control design for lateral motion regulation of intelligent vehicle’, IEEE-ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 2019, 24, (6), pp. 24882497.
    13. 13)
      • 18. Wang, B., Chen, W., Zhang, B.: ‘Semi-global robust tracking consensus for multi-agent uncertain systems with input saturation via metamorphic low-gain feedback’, Automatica, 2019, 103, pp. 363373.
    14. 14)
      • 26. An, X., Wu, M., He, H., et al: ‘A novel approach to provide lane departure warning using only one forward-looking camera’. Collaboration Technologies And Systems, Las Vegas, NV, 2006, pp. 356362.
    15. 15)
      • 6. Rath, J.J., Senouth, C., Popieul, J.C.: ‘Personalised lane keeping assist strategy: adaptation to driving style’, IET Control Theory Applic., 2019, 13, (1), pp. 106115.
    16. 16)
      • 11. Ungoren, A.Y., Peng, H.: ‘An adaptive lateral preview driver model’, Veh. Syst. Dyn., 2005, 43, (4), pp. 245259.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Deng, C., Wen, C.: ‘Distributed resilient observer-based fault-tolerant control for heterogeneous multiagent systems under actuator faults and DoS ATTACKS’, IEEE Trans. on Control of Netw. Syst., 2020, 7, (3), pp. 13081318.
    18. 18)
      • 1. Peng, H., Wang, Q., An, C., et al: ‘Path tracking and direct yaw moment coordinated control based on robust MPC with the finite time horizon for autonomous independent-drive vehicles’, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2020, 69, (6), pp. 60536066.
    19. 19)
      • 8. Hongbo, W., Li, C., Weihua, Z.: ‘Lane-keeping control based on an improved artificial potential method and coordination of steering/braking systems’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2019, 13, (12), pp. 18321842.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • 10. MacAdam, C.C.: ‘An optimal preview control for linear systems’, Trans. of ASME, 1980, 102, pp. 188190.
    23. 23)
      • 24. Li, S., Li, K., Rajamani, R., et al: ‘Model predictive multi-objective vehicular adaptive cruise control’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2011, 19, (3), pp. 556566.
    24. 24)
      • 13. Ji, J., Khajepour, A., Melek, W.W., et al: ‘Path planning and tracking for vehicle collision avoidance based on model predictive control with multiconstraints’, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2017, 66, (2), pp. 952964.
    25. 25)
      • 15. Borrelli, F., Keviczky, P., Asgari, T., et al: ‘MPC-based approach to active steering for autonomous vehicle systems’, Int. J. Veh. Auton. Syst., 2005, 3, (2), pp. 265291.
    26. 26)
      • 22. Anderson, S.J., Peters, S.C., Pilutti, T.E., et al: ‘An optimal-control-based framework for trajectory planning, threat assessment, and semi-autonomous control of passenger vehicles in hazard avoidance scenarios’, Int. J. Veh. Auton. Syst., 2010, 8, (2–4), pp. 190216.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2020.0424
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2020.0424
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading