Multinomial logit analysis of the effects of five different app-based incentives to encourage cycling to work

Multinomial logit analysis of the effects of five different app-based incentives to encourage cycling to work

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study presents results from an investigation into the effect of positive incentives on cycling behaviour among 1802 commuters in the Twente region of the Netherlands. The authors used an on-line survey, which included mock-up apps with incentives to commute to work by bicycle. They tested five reward schemes, namely social rewards (such as badges), in-kind gifts, money, competition, and cooperation. They used the survey data in a multinomial logit model to estimate to what extent travellers will use the app and increase their cycling frequency and which incentives they prefer. The model results show that respondents who sometimes cycle to work are more positive about incentive schemes than respondents who never cycle and that offering an app with in-kind gifts is probably most effective. Interestingly, non-cyclists are more likely to change their behaviour for a reward if they care about travel costs, while occasional cyclists are more likely to cycle more often in response to incentives if they care about attributes that are related to the cycling itself. This also depends on attitudes towards cycling and on socio-demographic variables.


    1. 1)
      • 1. European Commission: ‘Road transport: reducing CO2 emissions from vehicles | climate action’. Available at, accessed May 2017.
    2. 2)
      • 2. World Health Organization: ‘WHO Europe obesity data and statistics’. Available at, accessed May 2017.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Hamer, M., Chida, Y.: ‘Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review’, Prev. Med., 2008, 46, (1), pp. 913.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Gordon-Larsen, P., Boone-Heinonen, J., Sidney, S., et al: ‘Active commuting and cardiovascular disease risk: the CARDIA study’, Arch. Intern. Med., 2009, 169, (13), pp. 12161223.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Park, S., Rink, L.D., Wallace, J.P.: ‘Accumulation of physical activity leads to a greater blood pressure reduction than a single continuous session, in prehypertension’, J. Hypertens., 2006, 24, (9), pp. 17611770.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Ben-Elia, E., Ettema, D.: ‘Changing commuters’ behavior using rewards: a study of rush-hour avoidance’, Transp. Res. F, Traffic Psychol. Behav., 2011, 14, (5), pp. 354368.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Bamberg, S., Schmidt, P.: ‘Incentives, morality, or habit?: predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis’, Environ. Behav., 2003, 35, (2), pp. 264285.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., et al: ‘Smarter choices: assessing the potential to achieve traffic reductions using ‘soft measures’’, Transp. Rev., 2008, 28, (5), pp. 593618.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Baum, L.: ‘Smart trips summit-U: an individualized marketing approach to changing travel behavior’, 2008.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Dubuy, V., De Cocker, K., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., et al: ‘Evaluation of a workplace intervention to promote commuter cycling: a RE-AIM analysis’, BMC Public Health, 2013, 13, (1), p. 587.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Steven, F., Avineri, E.: ‘Has the introduction of the cycle to work scheme increased levels of cycling to work in the UK?’. 43rd Universities Transport Study Group Conf., Milton Keynes, UK, 5–7 January 2011.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Wen, L.M., Orr, N., Bindon, J., et al: ‘Promoting active transport in a workplace setting: evaluation of a pilot study in Australia’, Health Promot. Int., 2005, 20, (2), pp. 123133.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Usui, T., Miwa, T., Yamamoto, T., et al: ‘Development and validation of internet-based personal travel assistance system for mobility management’. 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems and ITS America's 2008 Annual Meeting, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Zhang, Y., Stopher, P., Halling, B.: ‘An evaluation of TravelSmart tools for travel behaviour change’, 2010.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Brög, W., Erl, E., Ker, I., et al: ‘Evaluation of voluntary travel behaviour change: Experiences from three continents’, Transp. Policy, 2009, 16, (6), pp. 281292.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Wardman, M.R., Page, M.R., Tight, M., et al: ‘Cycling and urban mode choice. results of behavioural mode and route choice models’, 2000.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Ryley, T.: ‘Estimating cycling demand for the journey to work or study in West Edinburgh, Scotland’, J. Transp. Res. Board, 2006, 1982, (1), pp. 187193.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Yang, L., Sahlqvist, S., McMinn, A., et al: ‘Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review’, Br. Med. J., 2010, 341, pp. c5293c5293.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S.: ‘Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review’, Prev. Med., 2010, 50, (Suppl. 1), pp. S106S125.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Scheepers, C.E., Wendel-Vos, G.C.W., den Broeder, J.M., et al: ‘Shifting from car to active transport: a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions’, Transp. Res. A, Policy Pract., 2014, 70, pp. 264280.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Hu, X., Chiu, Y., Zhu, L.: ‘Behavior insights for an incentive-based active demand management platform’, Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol., 2015, 4, (2), pp. 119133.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Sanjust, B., Meloni, I., Spissu, E.: ‘An impact assessment of a travel behavior change program: a case study of a light rail service in Cagliari, Italy’, Case Stud. Transp. Policy, 2014, 3, (1), pp. 1222.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Zhu, C., Jia, S.Y., Mandayam, C.V., et al: ‘Reducing road congestion through incentives: a case study’. Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C, 2015.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Thomas, T., Jaarsma, R., Tutert, B.: ‘Exploring temporal fluctuations of daily cycling demand on Dutch cycle paths: the influence of weather on cycling’, Transportation, 2013, 40, (1), pp. 122.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Presslee, A., Vance, T.W., Webb, A.: ‘The effects of reward type on employee goal setting, goal commitment, and performance’, Account. Rev., 2013, 88, (5), pp. 15.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Shaffer, V.A., Arkes, H.R.: ‘Preference reversals in evaluations of cash versus non-cash incentives’, J. Econ. Psychol., 2009, 30, (6), pp. 859872.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Chorus, C.G., Molin, E.J.E., van Wee, B.: ‘Travel information as an instrument to change car drivers travel choices: a literature review’, Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res., 2006, 6, (4), pp. 335364.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Zhang, Z., Fujii, H., Managi, S.: ‘How does commuting behavior change due to incentives? An empirical study of the Beijing Subway System’, Transp. Res. F, Traffic Psychol. Behav., 2014, 24, pp. 1726.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: ‘Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features’, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 2009, 24, (1), pp. 485501.
    30. 30)
      • 30. Khaled, R., Barr, P., Noble, J., et al: ‘Fine tuning the persuasion in persuasive games’, Persuasive Technol., 2007, 4744, pp. 3647.
    31. 31)
      • 31. Locke, E.A, Latham, G.P.: ‘Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey’, Am. Psychol., 2002, 57, (9), pp. 705717.
    32. 32)
      • 32. Landers, R.N., Bauer, K.N., Callan, R.C.: ‘Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: a goal setting experiment’, Comput. Hum. Behav., 2017, 71, pp. 508515.
    33. 33)
      • 33. Fioreze, T., Thomas, T., Huang, B., et al: ‘How employees view smart cycling to work: A regional survey in the Netherlands’, Travel Behav. Soc., 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.04.002.
    34. 34)
      • 34. Research movements in the Netherlands (OViN)’. Available at, accessed June 2018.
    35. 35)
      • 35. Twente mobile – together for your mobility policy’. Available at, accessed January 2017.
    36. 36)
      • 36. Gneezy, U., Meier, S., Rey-Biel, P.: ‘When and why incentives (Don't) work to modify behavior’, J. Econ. Perspect., 2011, 25, (4), pp. 191210.
    37. 37)
      • 37. Dickinson, J.E., Kingham, S., Copsey, S., et al: ‘Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK?’, Transp. Res. D, Transp. Environ., 2003, 8, (1), pp. 5367.
    38. 38)
      • 38. List, J.A., Levitt, S.D.: ‘What do laboratory experiments tell us about the real world?’, 2006, 9 (June).
    39. 39)
      • 39. Levitt, S.D., List, J.A.: ‘What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?’, J. Econ. Perspect., 2016, 21, (2), pp. 153174.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address