Advancing usage-based insurance – a contextual driving risk modelling and analysis approach

Advancing usage-based insurance – a contextual driving risk modelling and analysis approach

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Most researchers and insurers evaluate driver's risks solely based on user global positioning system (GPS) trajectories. A new approach is proposed that collects individualised driving behaviour data from smartphone GPS module, combined with geographical network information and dynamic traffic conditions, to identify driving risk factors and evaluate driving behaviours in various contexts. The multi-source data reveals real world activity patterns as to when, where and how an individual driver performs, from which performance measurements on both the trip and driver level are defined to measure the risks. In addition, the relationship between the defined driving performance measurements and accident rate can be examined and verified by combining the crash history of the drivers. Numeric analysis on the trip level demonstrates that driving behaviour is context-sensitive, and the principal component analysis performed at the driver level shows that pedal operation and driving speed are the two most important performance measurements to characterise an individual's driving pattern. The subsequent correlation analysis of crash history and driving performances verify both pedal operation and driving speed are significantly related to more at-fault accidents, which validates the modelling and analysis efforts. The findings of their study further existing knowledge and provide foundations for advanced pay-as-you-drive-and-you-save insurance pricing.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Dobson, A., Brown, W., Ball, J., et al: ‘Women drivers’ behaviour, socio-demographic characteristics and accidents’, Accident Anal. Prev., 1999, 31, (5), pp. 525535.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Rhodes, N., Pivik, K.: ‘Age and gender differences in risky driving: the roles of positive affect and risk perception’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2011, 43, (3), pp. 923931.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Wenzel, T.P., Ross, M.: ‘The effects of vehicle model and driver behavior on risk’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2005, 37, (3), pp. 479494.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Yang, B., Zheng, R., Shimono, K., et al: ‘Evaluation of the effects of in-vehicle traffic lights on driving performances for unsignalised intersections’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 11, (2), pp. 7683.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Jonah, B.A.: ‘Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers’, Accident Anal. Prev., 1986, 18, (4), pp. 255271.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Yan, L., Huang, Z., Zhang, Y., et al: ‘Driving risk status prediction using Bayesian networks and logistic regression’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 11, pp. 431439.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Bordoff, J., Noel, P.J.: ‘Pay-as-you-drive auto insurance: a simple way to reduce driving-related harms and increase equity’ (The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 2008).
    8. 8)
      • 8. Chong, L., Abbas, M.M., Medina Flintsch, A., et al: ‘A rule-based neural network approach to model driver naturalistic behavior in traffic’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2013, 32, pp. 207223.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Engelbrecht, J., Booysen, M.J., van Rooyen, G.-J., et al: ‘Survey of smartphone-based sensing in vehicles for intelligent transportation system applications’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2015, 9, pp. 924935.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G., Pungillo, G.: ‘Measuring the driver's perception error in the traffic accident risk evaluation’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 11, pp. 659666.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Sun, D., Elefteriadou, L.: ‘A driver behavior-based lane-changing model for urban arterial streets’, Transp. Sci., 2014, 48, (2), pp. 184205.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Huang, Y., Sun, D.J., Zhang, L.-H.: ‘Identifying intra-personal heterogeneity of driver behavior from taxi GPS traces’, 2018.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Sun, D., Zhang, K., Shen, S.: ‘Analyzing spatiotemporal traffic line source emissions based on massive didi online car-hailing service data’, Transp. Res. D, Transp. Environ., 2018, 62, pp. 699714.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Lord, D., Mannering, F.: ‘The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives’, Transp. Res. A, Policy Pract., 2010, 44, (5), pp. 291305.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Mannering, F.L., Bhat, C.R.: ‘Analytic methods in accident research: methodological frontier and future directions’, Anal. Meth. Accident Res., 2014, 1, pp. 122.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Guo, F., Wang, X., Abdel-Aty, M.A.: ‘Modeling signalized intersection safety with corridor-level spatial correlations’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2010, 42, (1), pp. 8492.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Yu, R., Xiong, Y., Abdel-Aty, M.: ‘A correlated random parameter approach to investigate the effects of weather conditions on crash risk for a mountainous freeway’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2015, 50, pp. 6877.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Park, B.-J., Lord, D., Lee, C.: ‘Finite mixture modeling for vehicle crash data with application to hotspot identification’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2014, 71, pp. 319326.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Mannering, F.L.: ‘Male/female driver characteristics and accident risk: some new evidence’, Accident Anal. Prev., 1993, 25, (1), pp. 7784.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A.: ‘Modeling ordered choices a primer’ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010).
    21. 21)
      • 21. Castro, M., Paleti, R., Bhat, C.R.: ‘A latent variable representation of count data models to accommodate spatial and temporal dependence: application to predicting crash frequency at intersections’, Transp. Res. B, Methodol., 2012, 46, (1), pp. 253272.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Paleti, R.: ‘Generalized extreme value models for count data: application to worker telecommuting frequency choices’, Transp. Res. B, Methodol., 2016, 83, pp. 104120.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Jun, J., Guensler, R., Ogle, J.: ‘Differences in observed speed patterns between crash-involved and crash-not-involved drivers: application of in-vehicle monitoring technology’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2011, 19, (4), pp. 569578.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Jun, J., Ogle, J., Guensler, R.: ‘Relationships between crash involvement and temporal-spatial driving behavior activity patterns: use of data for vehicles with global positioning systems’, Transp. Res. Rec., J. Transp. Res. Board, 2007, 2019, pp. 246255.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Zhu, X., Yuan, Y., Hu, X., et al: ‘A Bayesian network model for contextual versus non-contextual driving behavior assessment’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2017, 81, pp. 172187.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Ma, Y.-L., Zhu, X., Hu, X., et al: ‘The use of context-sensitive insurance telematics data in auto insurance rate making’, Transp. Res. A, Policy Pract., 2018, 113, pp. 243258.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address