Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

V2V-based method for the detection of road traffic congestion

V2V-based method for the detection of road traffic congestion

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
$19.95
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The traffic congestion detection based on the internet of vehicles is gaining enormous research interest. A vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V)-based method for the detection of road traffic congestion is proposed. Firstly, a fuzzy controller was constructed based on the vehicle speed, traffic density, and traffic congestion rating system, and the level of local traffic congestion was evaluated. Then, the level of local traffic congestion of neighbouring vehicles was queried based on V2V communication, and the level of regional traffic congestion was obtained based on a large sub-sample hypothesis test. Finally, a simulation test platform was built based on vehicles in network simulation, and the back-off time slots and received packets of vehicle nodes were calculated. The accuracy of the proposed method for detecting road traffic congestion was compared to the cooperative traffic congestion detection (CoTEC) method and the geomagnetic coil method. The results show that the detection accuracy of the proposed method increased by 5.5 and 7.5%, respectively, compared to the geomagnetic coil method and CoTEC method. The V2V communication network overhead of the proposed traffic congestion detection method is reduced by 90.8% compared to the adopted CoTEC method. The communication overhead of the vehicle node using the proposed method is significantly decreased when there is no traffic congestion.

References

    1. 1)
      • 22. Wei, Q., He, Z., Zheng, X., et al: ‘Prediction of urban traffic performance index considering multiple factors’, J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 2017, 17, (1), pp. 7481.
    2. 2)
      • 4. Chung, J., Sohn, K.: ‘Image-based learning to measure traffic density using a deep convolutional neural network’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2018, 19, (5), pp. 16701675.
    3. 3)
      • 17. Sanguesa, J.A., Barrachina, J., Fogue, M., et al: ‘Sensing traffic density combining V2V and V2I wireless communications’, Sensors, 2015, 15, (12), pp. 3179431810.
    4. 4)
      • 11. Lakas, A., Cheqfah, M.: ‘Detection and dissipation of road traffic congestion using vehicular communication’. Microwave Symp., Tangiers, Morocco, November 2009, pp. 16.
    5. 5)
      • 10. Mandal, K., Sen, A., Chakraborty, A., et al: ‘Road traffic congestion monitoring and measurement using active RFID and GSM technology’. Int. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Washington, DC, USA, October 2011, pp. 13751379.
    6. 6)
      • 20. Martuscelli, G., Boukerche, A., Foschini, L., et al: ‘V2v protocols for traffic congestion discovery along routes of interest in VANETs: a quantitative study’, Wirel. Commun. Mobile Comput., 2016, 16, (17), pp. 29072923.
    7. 7)
      • 12. Mao, R., Mao, G.: ‘Road traffic density estimation in vehicular networks’. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf., Shanghai, China, April 2013, pp. 46534658.
    8. 8)
      • 15. Chen, K., Li, Z.: ‘Prediction of traffic state based on fuzzy logic in vanet’, Inf. Technol. J., 2013, 12, (18), pp. 46424646.
    9. 9)
      • 26. Jutila, M., Scholliers, J., Valta, M., et al: ‘ITS-G5 performance improvement and evaluation for vulnerable road user safety services’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 11, (3), pp. 126133.
    10. 10)
      • 16. Bauza, R., Gozalvez, J.: ‘Traffic congestion detection in large-scale scenarios using vehicle-to-vehicle communica-tions’, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 2013, 36, (5), pp. 12951307.
    11. 11)
      • 25. Guo, H., Yuan, X., Xu, D.: ‘Selection of measures of performance on calibrating parameters in car following models’, China J. Highway Transp., 2017, 30, (1), pp. 103110.
    12. 12)
      • 3. Coifman, B.: ‘Identifying the onset of congestion rapidly with existing traffic detectors’, Transp. Res. A, Policy Practice, 2003, 37, (3), pp. 277291.
    13. 13)
      • 23. Sommer, C., German, R., Dressler, F.: ‘Bidirectionally coupled network and road traffic simulation for improved IVC analysis’, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 2010, 10, (1), pp. 315.
    14. 14)
      • 1. Knorr, F., Baselt, D., Schreckenberg, M., et al: ‘Reducing traffic jams via vanets’, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2012, 61, (8), pp. 34903498.
    15. 15)
      • 8. Demissie, M.G., Correia, G.H.D.A., Bento, C.: ‘Intelligent road traffic status detection system through cellular networks handover information: An exploratory study’, Transp. Res. C, 2013, 32, (6), pp. 7688.
    16. 16)
      • 14. Zhang, E.Z., Kuang, Y.J., Laboratory, M.L.: ‘Road traffic situation detection method based on VANETs’, Appl. Res. Comput., 2014, 31, (11), pp. 32573260.
    17. 17)
      • 13. Miller, J.: ‘Vehicle-to-vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2V2I) intelligent transportation system architecture’. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., Eindhoven, Netherlands, June 2008, pp. 715720.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Fazio, P., Rango, F.D., Sottile, C.: ‘An on demand interference aware routing protocol for VANETs’, J. Netw., 2012, 7, (11), pp. 17281738.
    19. 19)
      • 7. Wang, P., Hunter, T., Bayen, A.M., et al: ‘Understanding road usage patterns in urban areas’, Sci. Rep., 2012, 2, (12), p. 1001.
    20. 20)
      • 9. Fei, W., Song, G., Zang, J., et al: ‘Framework model for time-variant propagation speed and congestion boundary by incident on expressways’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 11, (1), pp. 1017.
    21. 21)
      • 2. Yuan, Q., Liu, Z., Li, J., et al: ‘A traffic congestion detection and information dissemination scheme for urban expressways using vehicular networks’, Transp. Res. C, 2014, 47, (6), pp. 114127.
    22. 22)
      • 5. Hellinga, B., Izadpanah, P., Takada, H., et al: ‘Decomposing travel times measured by probe-based traffic monitoring systems to individual road segments’, Transp. Res. C, 2008, 16, (6), pp. 768782.
    23. 23)
      • 27. Xu, Z., Li, X., Zhao, X., et al: ‘DSRC versus 4G-LTE for connected vehicle applications: a study on field experiments of vehicular communication performance’, J. Adv. Transp., 2017, 2017, pp. 110.
    24. 24)
      • 6. He, Z., Zheng, L., Chen, P., et al: ‘Mapping to cells: a simple method to extract traffic dynamics from probe vehicle data’, Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 2017, 32, (3), pp. 252267.
    25. 25)
      • 19. Zhao, Z., Chen, W., Wu, X., et al: ‘LSTM network: a deep learning approach for short-term traffic forecast’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 11, (2), pp. 6875.
    26. 26)
      • 21. Guo, J., Liu, Z., Huang, W., et al: ‘Short-term traffic flow prediction using fuzzy information granulation approach under different time intervals’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2018, 12, (2), pp. 143150.
    27. 27)
      • 24. Gao, F., Li, S.E., Zheng, Y., et al: ‘Robust control of heterogeneous vehicular platoon with uncertain dynamics and communication delay’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 10, (7), pp. 503513.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2018.5177
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2018.5177
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address