http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Multi-objective optimal cooperative driving for connected and automated vehicles at non-signalised intersection

Multi-objective optimal cooperative driving for connected and automated vehicles at non-signalised intersection

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The problem of cooperative driving for the connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) at the non-signalised intersection is addressed in this study. The conceptions of conflict point and intersection layout are used to formulate the mathematical model of the non-signalised intersection. Based on this model, a novel cooperative control algorithm is proposed for the CAVs driving at the non-signalised intersection. In the cooperative algorithm, the high-dimensional problem of multi-CAV cooperating at multi-conflict points is expediently converted into the single-dimensional problem of searching the optimal time for current CAV to enter the intersection. Then the analytical solution based on Pontryagin's minimum principle considering constraints of vehicles is used to control the CAVs at the intersection area. In addition, the modification of the switching input is used to reduce the CAVs’ jerk. With the cooperative control algorithm, the multi-objectives are considered including guaranteeing CAV safety, alleviating traffic congestion, and improving the performance of fuel consumption. In particular, the low-computational characteristic of the proposed algorithm guarantees that each CAV can get the optimal solution quickly and effectively. Simulation results verify that the proposed algorithm is capable of achieving coordination of CAVs with the various speeds at the non-signalised intersection.

References

    1. 1)
      • 1. Schrank, B., Eisele, B., Lomax, T., et al: ‘2015 urban mobility scorecard’. Tech. Rep., Texas A& M Transportation Institute, 2015.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Tang, X., Hu, X., Yang, W., et al: ‘Novel torsional vibration modeling and assessment of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle equipped with a dual mass flywheel’, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2017, 67, pp. 19902000.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Tang, X., Yang, W., Hu, X., et al: ‘A novel simplified model for torsional vibration analysis of a series-parallel hybrid electric CAV’, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2017, 85, pp. 329338.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Levinson, D., Boies, A., Cao, J., et al: ‘The transportation futures project: planning for technology change’. Tech. Rep. MN/RC 2016-02, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, 2016.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Cao, W., Mukai, M., Kawabe, T., et al: ‘Cooperative vehicle path generation during merging using model predictive control with real-time optimization’, Control Eng. Pract., 2015, 34, pp. 98105.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Kamalanathsharma, R. K., Rakha, H. A.: ‘Leveraging connected vehicle technology and telematics to enhance vehicle fuel efficiency in the vicinity of signalized intersections’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2014, 20, pp. 112.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Zhao, Y., Wagh, A., Hou, Y., et al: ‘Integrated traffic-driving-networking simulator for the design of connected vehicle applications: eco-signal case study’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2014, 20, pp. 113.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Ma, J., Smith, B. L., Fontaine, M. D.: ‘Comparison of in-vehicle auditory public traffic information with roadside dynamic message signs’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 20, pp. 244254.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Wang, M., Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S. P., et al: ‘Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Technol. Plan. Oper., 2016, 20, pp. 559572.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Li, M., Chen, X., Lin, X., et al: ‘Connected vehicle-based red-light running prediction for adaptive signalized intersections’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 21, pp. 112.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Smith, S., Razo, M.: ‘Using traffic microsimulation to assess deployment strategies for the connected vehicle safety pilot’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 20, pp. 19.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Olia, A., Abdelgawad, H., Abdulhai, B., et al: ‘Assessing the potential impacts of connected vehicles: mobility, environmental, and safety perspectives’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Technol. Plan. Oper., 2016, 20, pp. 229243.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Zohdy, I. H., Rakha, H. A.: ‘Intersection management via vehicle connectivity: the intersection cooperative adaptive cruise control system concept’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2014, 20, pp. 1732.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Malikopoulos, A. A., Cassandras, C. G.: ‘Decentralized optimal control for connected and automated vehicles at an intersection’. Proc. 55th Conf. on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016, pp. 110.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Connected vehicle research’. Available at http://www.its.dot.gov/connected_vehicle/connected_vehicle.htm, accessed 24 March 2018.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Dresner, K., Stone, P.: ‘Multiagent traffic management: a reservation-based intersection control mechanism’. Proc. 3rd Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), New York, NY, USA, 2004, pp. 530537.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Au, T. C., Stone, P.: ‘Motion planning algorithms for autonomous intersection management’ (Bridging the Gap Between Task and Motion Planning Press, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010).
    18. 18)
      • 18. Fortelle, A. D. L.: ‘Analysis of reservation algorithms for cooperative planning at intersections’. Proc. 13th Int. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Funchal, Portugal, 2010, pp. 445449.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Huang, S., Sadek, A. W., Zhao, Y.: ‘Assessing the mobility and environmental benefits of reservation-based intelligent intersections using an integrated simulator’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2012, 20, pp. 12011214.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Li, L., Wang, F. Y.: ‘Cooperative driving at blind crossings using intervehicle communication’, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2006, 55, pp. 17121724.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Alonso, J., Milanĺęs, V., Pĺęrez, J., et al: ‘Autonomous vehicle control systems for safe crossroads’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2011, 19, pp. 10951110.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Lee, J., Park, B.: ‘Development and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle intersection control algorithm under the connected vehicles environment’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2012, 13, pp. 8190.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Makarem, L., Gillet, D.: ‘Model predictive coordination of autonomous vehicles crossing intersections’. Proc. 16th Int. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), The Hague, Netherlands, 2013, pp. 17991804.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Kim, K. D., Kumar, P. R.: ‘An MPC-based approach to provable system-wide safety and liveness of autonomous ground traffic’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2014, 59, pp. 33413356.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Miculescu, D., Karaman, S.: ‘Polling-systems-based control of high-performance provably-safe autonomous intersections’. Proc. 53rd Int. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2014, pp. 14171423.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Colombo, A., Vecchio, D. D.: ‘Least restrictive supervisors for intersection collision avoidance: a scheduling approach’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2015, 60, pp. 15151527.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Dai, P., Liu, K., Zhuge, Q., et al: ‘Quality-of-experience-oriented autonomous intersection control in vehicular networks’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 17, pp. 19561967.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Rios-Torres, J., Malikopoulos, A. A.: ‘Automated and cooperative vehicle merging at highway on-ramps’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 18, pp. 110.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Kim, N., Cha, S., Peng, H.: ‘Optimal control of hybrid electric vehicles based on Pontryagin's minimum principle’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2011, 19, pp. 12791287.
    30. 30)
      • 30. Rios-Torres, J., Malikopoulos, A. A.: ‘A survey on the coordination of connected and automated vehicles at intersections and merging at highway on-ramps’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 18, pp. 10661077.
    31. 31)
      • 31. Xie, Y., Zhang, H., Gartner, N. H., et al: ‘Collaborative merging strategy for freeway ramp operations in a connected and autonomous vehicles environment’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 21, pp. 136147.
    32. 32)
      • 32. Milanes, V., Godoy, J., Villagra, J., et al: ‘Automated on-ramp merging system for congested traffic situations’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2010, 12, pp. 500508.
    33. 33)
      • 33. Mĺźller, E. R., Carlson, R. C., Kraus, W.: ‘Time optimal scheduling of automated vehicle arrivals at urban intersections’. Proc. 19th Int. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2016, pp. 11741179.
    34. 34)
      • 34. Pontryagin, L. S., Boltyanskii, V. G., Gamkrelidze, R. V., et al: ‘The mathematical theory of optimal processes’ (Interscience Press, New York, 1962).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2018.5100
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2018.5100
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address