Experimental analyses and clustering of travel choice behaviours by floating car big data in a large urban area

Experimental analyses and clustering of travel choice behaviours by floating car big data in a large urban area

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study introduces a general methodology to process sparse floating car data, reconstruct the routes followed by the drivers, and cluster them to achieve suitable choice sets of significantly different routes for calibrating behavioural models. This methodology is applied to a large set of floating car data collected in Rome in 2010. Results underlined that routes assigned to different clusters are actually very different to each other. Nevertheless, as expected according to Wardrop's principle, the clusters belonging to the same origin–destination have rather similar average route travel times, even if there is a large range between their minimum and maximum values. A focus on drivers’ behaviour highlighted their propensity to follow the same route to their usual destination, though the 12% of the drivers switched to an alternative route. However, the analysis conducted over the 1 month of observations did not reveal the existence of any systematic correlation between neither the change of route nor the change of departure time and the travel time experienced the day before.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Fusco, G., Colombaroni, C., Isaenko, N.: ‘Short-term speed predictions exploiting big data on large urban road networks’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2016, 73, pp. 183201.
    2. 2)
      • 2. De Felice, M., Baiocchi, A., Cuomo, F., et al: ‘Traffic monitoring and incident detection through VANETs’. Proc. 11th IEEE Annual Conf. Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), 2014, pp. 122129.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Fusco, G., Colombaroni, C., Isaenko, N.: ‘Comparative analysis of implicit models for real-time short-term traffic predictions’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 10, (4), pp. 270278.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Fusco, G., Colombaroni, C., Isaenko, N.: ‘Dynamic traveler information systems’, in Fusco, G. (Ed.): ‘Intelligent transport systems (ITS): past, present and future directions’ (Nova Science, Hauppauge, NY, 2017).
    5. 5)
      • 5. Akgün, V., Erkut, E., Batta, R.: ‘On finding dissimilar paths’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2000, 121, (2), pp. 232246.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Dell'Olmo, P., Gentili, M., Scozzari, A.: ‘On finding dissimilar Pareto-optimal paths’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2005, 162, (1), pp. 7082.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Martí, R., González-Velarde, J.L., Duarte, A.: ‘Heuristics for the biobjective path dissimilarity problem’, Comput. Oper. Res., 2009, 36, pp. 29052912.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Cascetta, E., Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F., et al: ‘A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks’. Proc. 13th Int. Symp. Transportation and Traffic Theory, Pergamon, Lyon, France, 1997, pp. 697711.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Bekhor, S., Ben-Akiva, M., Ramming, M.S.: ‘Adaptation of logit kernel to route choice situation’, Transp. Res. Rec., 2002, 1805, pp. 7885.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Marzano, V., Papola, A.: ‘A link based path-multilevel logit model for route choice which allows implicit path enumeration’. Proc. European Transport Conf., Strasbourg, France, 2004.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Cascetta, E., Papola, A.: ‘Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2001, 9, (4), pp. 249263.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Fusco, G., Colombaroni, C., Comelli, L., et al: ‘Short-term traffic predictions on large urban traffic networks: applications of network-based machine learning models and dynamic traffic assignment models’. Proc. Fourth IEEE Int. Conf. Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), 2015, pp. 93101.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Isaenko, N., Colombaroni, C., Fusco, G.: ‘Traffic dynamics estimation by using raw floating car data’. Fifth IEEE Int. Conf. Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), 2017, pp. 704709.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Rahmani, M., Koutsopoulos, H.N.: ‘Path inference from sparse floating car data for urban networks’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2013, 30, pp. 4154.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Frejinger, E., Bierlaire, M.: ‘Capturing correlation with subnetworks in route choice models’, Transp. Res. B, Methodol., 2007, 41, (3), pp. 363378.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Bierlaire, M., Chen, J., Newman, J.: ‘A probabilistic map matching method for smartphone GPS data’, Transp. Res. C, 2013, 26.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Chen, F., Shen, M., Tang, Y.: ‘Local path searching based map matching algorithm for floating car data’. Int. Conf. Environmental Science and Information Application Technology (ESIAT 2011), Beijing, China, June 2011, pp. 704709.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Li, J., Xie, L.H., Lai, X.J.: ‘Route reconstruction from floating car data with low sampling rate based on feature matching’, Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2013, 6, (12), pp. 21532158.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Liu, X., Liu, K., Li, M., et al: ‘A ST-CRF map-matching method for low-frequency floating car data’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 18, (5).
    20. 20)
      • 20. Kim, J., Mahmassani, H.S.: ‘Spatial and temporal characterization of travel patterns in a traffic patterns in a traffic network using vehicle trajectories’, Transp. Res. Procedia, 2015, 9.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Meneguzzer, C., Olivieri, A.: ‘Day-to-day traffic dynamics: laboratory-like experiment on route choice and route switching in a simple network with limited feedback information’, Soc. Behav. Sci., 2013, 87, pp. 4459.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Selten, R., Chmura, T., Pitz, T., et al: ‘Commuters route choice behavior’, Games Econ. Behav., 2007, 58, (2), pp. 394406.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Avineri, E., Prashker, J.N.: ‘Sensitivity to travel time variability: travelers’ learning perspective’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2005, 13, (2), pp. 157183.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Vacca, A., Meloni, I.: ‘Understanding route switch behavior: an analysis using GPS based data’, Transp. Res. Procedia, 2015, 5, pp. 5665.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Mahmassani, H.S., Liu, Y.: ‘Dynamics of commuting decision behavior under advanced traveler information systems’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 1999, 7, pp. 9197.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Tawfik, A.M., Rakha, H.A., Miller, S.D.: ‘An experimental exploration of route choice: identifying drivers choices and choice patterns and capturing network evolution’. 13th Int. IEEE Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Funchal, Portugal, September 2010.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Rambaldi, S., Marchioni, M., Bazzani, A., et al: ‘Traffic global analysis on the whole Italian road network’. IEEE MIPRO, Proc. 35th Int. Convention, Opatija, Croatia, May 2012, pp. 16781682.
    28. 28)
      • 28. de la Barra, T., Perez, B., Anez, J.: ‘Multidimensional path search and assignment’. 21st PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, University of Manchester, UK, 1993.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address