Data analytics approach for train timetable performance measures using automatic train supervision data

Data analytics approach for train timetable performance measures using automatic train supervision data

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Motivated by the practical requirements for timetable evaluation in China and the fact that massive train record data are collected but remain largely underused, this study presents a data analytics approach for train timetable performance measures using automatic train supervision data. A data preparation process with data cleaning and matching methods is developed for further analysis. The data analysis consists of three components: a waiting time assessment method that uses visual headway mismatching degree to estimate the effect on waiting time; a process time estimation method that introduces spatiotemporal distribution and statistical techniques to mine the data and identify practical characteristics of dwell time and running time; and an arrival punctuality examination method which checks on-time arrival performance. The proposed data analytics approach is demonstrated through a case study of Shanghai Metro. Major findings on timetable performance, involving three aspects of timetable parameters, are presented. The relevant data analytics framework and findings have operational and planning implications for urban rail transit authorities and operators with regard to evaluating timetable parameters and improving the service quality.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Hansen, I.A.: ‘Station capacity and stability of train operations’. Computers in Railways VII, 2000, pp. 809816.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Goverde, R.M.P., Odijk, M.A.: ‘Performance evaluation of network timetables using PETER’. Computers in Railways VIII, 2002, pp. 731740.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Goverde, R.M.P.: ‘Railway timetable stability analysis using max-plus system theory’, Transp. Res. B, Methodol., 2007, 41, (2), pp. 179201.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Delorme, X., Gandibleux, X., Rodriguez, J.: ‘Stability evaluation of a railway timetable at station level’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2009, 195, (3), pp. 780790.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Cacchiani, V., Toth, P.: ‘Nominal and Robust train timetabling problems’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2012, 219, (3), pp. 727737.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Goverde, R.M.P., Bešinović, N., Binder, A., et al: ‘A three-level framework for performance-based railway timetabling’. Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol, 2016, 67, pp. 6283.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Van Der Meer, D., Goverde, R.M.P., Hansen, I.A.: ‘Prediction of train running times and conflicts using track occupation data’. Proc. 12th World Conf. on Transport Research, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Kecman, P., Goverde, R.M.P.: ‘Predictive modelling of running and dwell times in railway traffic’, Public Transp., 2015, 7, (3), pp. 295319.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Ushida, K., Makino, S., Tomii, N.: ‘Increasing robustness of dense timetables by visualization of train traffic record data and Montecarlo simulation’. Proc. 9th World Congress on Railway Research, Lille, France, 2011.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Meng, L., Goverde, R.M.P.: ‘A method for constructing train delay propagation process by mining train record data’, J. Beijing Jiaotong Univ. Nat. Sci., 2012, 36, (6), pp. 1520.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Li, D., Daamen, W., Goverde, R.M.P.: ‘Estimation of train dwell time at short stops based on track occupation event data: a study at a Dutch railway station’, J. Adv. Transp., 2016, 50, (3), pp. 120.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Muller, T.H.J., Furth, P.G.: ‘Trip time analyzers: key to transit service quality’. Transp. Res. Rec., 2001, 1760, pp. 1019.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Kimpel, T.J., Strathman, J.G., Bertini, R.L., et al: ‘Analysis of transit signal priority using archived TriMet bus dispatch system data’, Transp. Res. Rec., 2005, 1925, pp. 156166.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Furth, P.G., Hemily, B.J., Muller, T.H.J., et al: ‘Using archived AVL-APC data to improve transit performance and management’. Transp. Res. Rec. TCRP Report 113, 2006.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Elgeneidy, A., Horning, J., Krizek, K.J.: ‘Using archived ITS data to improve transit performance and management’. Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services Section, Report 2007-44, 2007.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Fan, W., Haile, E., Chavez, T., et al: ‘Equipment replacement/retention decision making: final report’ (Texas Department of Transportation, Report 0-6693-1, 2015).
    17. 17)
      • 17. Liu, F., Xu, R., Zhao, Z., et al: ‘A big data analysis method for evaluating train delay effects in urban rail transit’. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis, Lille, France, 2017, pp. 14341449.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Wang, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., et al: ‘Method for the measurement and correction of train diagram parameters based on monitoring data mining’, China Railw. Sci., 2011, 32, (4), pp. 117121.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Jiang, Z., Hsu, C., Zhang, D., et al: ‘Evaluating rail transit timetable using big passengers' data’, J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 2016, 82, (1), pp. 144155.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Kong, X., Xia, F., Wang, J., et al: ‘Time-location-relationship combined service recommendation based on taxi trajectory data’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 2017, 13, (3), pp. 12021212.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address