access icon free How many times do young drivers actually touch their smartphone screens while driving?

Smartphone usage while driving, and particularly texting, poses a major concern for road safety. The goal of this study is to suggest a novel and objective means to measure the smartphone usage among young drivers. A naturalistic study was conducted with 254 Israeli young drivers who installed a research-oriented smartphone app which continuously monitors smartphones usage while driving. The app captures the actual number of times drivers are ‘touching’ their smartphone screens, the speed at which these screen-touches occur, foreground apps and time stamps. The results, which are based on 3304 h of driving performed in 11,528 trips, indicate that young drivers touch their smartphone screen on average 1.6 times per minute of driving. Alarmingly, more than half of the screen-touches are performed while the vehicle is in motion, and some touches occur even at speeds higher than 100 km/h. The screen-touches occur throughout the trip regardless of its duration. Approximately half of them are performed while using WhatsApp, a popular free messaging app. These findings provide objective evidence to the actual and intensive usage of smartphones. While comparing these results to participants' self-reports, it was found that young drivers clearly underestimate their smartphone usage while driving.

Inspec keywords: smart phones; touch sensitive screens; traffic engineering computing; social networking (online); road safety

Other keywords: foreground apps; screen-touches; WhatsApp; research-oriented smartphone app; time stamps; smartphone screens; time 3304 h; road safety

Subjects: Mobile, ubiquitous and pervasive computing; Traffic engineering computing; Information networks

References

    1. 1)
      • 1. Kinnear, N., Stevens, A.: ‘The battle for attention - driver distraction – a review of recent research and knowledge’ (The Institute of Advanced Motorists, London, 2015). Available at www.iam.org.uk.
    2. 2)
      • 4. Klauer, S.G., Guo, F., Simons-Morton, B.G., et al: ‘Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers’, N. Engl. J. Med., 2014, 370, (1), pp. 5459.
    3. 3)
      • 17. Yannis, G., Laiou, A., Papantoniou, P., et al: ‘Impact of texting on young driver's behaviour and safety on motorways by the use of a driving simulator’. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Driver Distraction and Interaction, 2013. Available at http://www.google.de/url.
    4. 4)
      • 10. Hedlund, J.Distracted driving: what research shows and what states can do’, 2011..
    5. 5)
      • 7. Owens, J.M., McLaughlin, S.B., Sudweeks, J.: ‘Driver performance while text messaging using handheld and in-vehicle systems’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2011, 43, (3), pp. 939947.
    6. 6)
      • 28. Prato, C.G., Toledo, T., Lotan, T., et al: ‘Modeling the behaviour of novice young drivers during the first year after licensure’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2010, 42, (2), pp. 480486.
    7. 7)
      • 23. Albert, G., Lotan, T., Toledo, T., et al: ‘Are young drivers as careful as they deem? In vehicle data recorders and self reports evaluations’, Eur. Transport Res. Rev., 2014, 6, (4), pp. 469476.
    8. 8)
      • 6. Fitch, G.A., Soccolich, S.A., Guo, F., et al: ‘The impact of hand-held and hands-free cell phone use on driving performance and safety-critical event risk’. Report no. DOT HS 811 757. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, 2013.
    9. 9)
      • 21. Wikipedia. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_messaging, accessed 5 September 2016.
    10. 10)
      • 27. Shinar, D., Compton, R.: ‘Aggressive driving: an observational study of driver, vehicle, and situational variables’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2004, 36, (3), pp. 429437.
    11. 11)
      • 26. Smart, R.G., Stoduto, R., Mann, R.E., et al: ‘Road rage experience and behaviour: vehicle, exposure, and driver factors’, Traffic Injury Prev., 2004, 5, pp. 229231.
    12. 12)
      • 18. He, J., Choi, W., McCarley, J.S., et al: ‘Texting while driving using Google Glass™: promising but not distraction-free’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2015, 81, pp. 218229..
    13. 13)
      • 2. Delgado, M.K., Wanner, K.J., McDonald, C.: ‘Adolescent cellphone use while driving: an overview of the literature and promising future directions for prevention’, Media Commun., 2016, 4, (3), pp. 7989.
    14. 14)
      • 11. NHTSA. ‘National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Driver Electronic Device Use in 2014’. Traffic Safety Facts Research Note (National Highway Traffic Safety), 2015.
    15. 15)
      • 20. Simons-Morton, B.G., Guo, F., Klauer, S.G., et al: ‘Keep your eyes on the road: young driver crash risk increases according to duration of distraction’, J Adolesc. Health, 2014, 54, (5), Supplement, pp. S61S67.
    16. 16)
      • 5. Victor, T., Dozza, M., Bärgman, J., et al: ‘Analysis of naturalistic driving study data: safer glances, driver inattention, and crash risk’. 2014.
    17. 17)
      • 14. O'Brien, N.P., Goodwin, A.H., Foss, R.D.: ‘Talking and texting among teenage drivers: a glass half empty or half full?Traffic Injury Prev., 2014, 11, (6), pp. 549554.
    18. 18)
      • 22. Albert, G., Musicant, O., Oppenheim, I., et al: ‘Which smartphone's apps may contribute to road safety? An AHP model to evaluate experts’ opinions’, Transp. Policy, 2016, 50, pp. 5462.
    19. 19)
      • 16. Creaser, J.I., Edwards, C.J., Morris, N.L., et al: ‘Are cellular phone blocking applications effective for novice teen drivers?J. Safety Res., 2015, 54, pp. 7582..
    20. 20)
      • 13. Musicant, O., Lotan, T., Albert, G.: ‘Do we really need to use our smartphones while driving?Accident Anal. Prev., 2015, 85, pp. 1321.
    21. 21)
      • 24. Toledo, T., Farah, H., Morik, S., et al: ‘Driving exposure of Israeli young male drivers within a graduated driver licensing system’, Transport. Res. F, 2014, 26, part A, pp. 180189.
    22. 22)
      • 15. Ehsani, J., Brooks-Russell, A., Li, K., et al: ‘Novice teenage driver cell phone use prevalence’. Proc. Seventh Int. Driving Symp. Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Iowa City, IA, 2013.
    23. 23)
      • 25. Globes, 2013. Available at http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000893814, accessed 29 September, 2016 (in Hebrow).
    24. 24)
      • 9. He, J., Chaparro, A., Nguyen, B., et al: ‘Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?Accident Anal. Prev., 2014, 72, pp. 287295..
    25. 25)
      • 19. Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Reagan, I., et al: ‘Multi-modal demands of a smartphone used to place calls and enter addresses during highway driving relative to two embedded systems’, Ergonomics, 2016, 59, (12), pp. 15651585.
    26. 26)
      • 8. Yager, C.An evaluation of the effectiveness of voice to-text programs at reducing incidences of distracted driving’ (Texas A &M Transportation Institute, the Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, 2013).
    27. 27)
      • 12. Atchley, P., Atwood, S., Boulton, A.: ‘The choice to text and drive in young drivers: behaviour may shape attitude’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2011, 43, pp. 134142.
    28. 28)
      • 3. Dingus, T.A.: ‘Estimates of prevalence and risk associated with inattention and distraction based upon in situ naturalistic data’, Ann. Adv. Automot. Med., 2014, 58, p. 60.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Strayer, D.L., Biondi, F., et al: ‘Cell-phone use diminishes self-awareness of impaired driving’, Psychonom. Bull. Rev., 2016, 23, (2), pp. 617623.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0208
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0208
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading