Developing a simulation framework for safe and optimal trajectories considering drivers’ driving style

Developing a simulation framework for safe and optimal trajectories considering drivers’ driving style

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Advanced driving assistance systems (ADAS) have huge potential for improving road safety and travel times. However, their take-up in the market is very slow; and these systems should consider driver's preferences to increase adoption rates. The aim of this study is to develop a model providing drivers with the optimal trajectory considering the motorist's driving style in real time. Travel duration and safety are the main parameters used to find the optimal trajectory. A simulation framework to determine the optimal trajectory was developed in which the ego car travels in a highway environment scenario, using an agent-oriented approach. The performance of the algorithm was compared against optimal trajectories computed offline with the hybrid A* algorithm. The new framework provides trajectories close to the optimal trajectory and is computationally achievable. The agents were shown to follow safe and fast trajectories in three tests scenarios: emergency braking, overtaking and a complex situation with multiple vehicles around the ego vehicle. Different driver profiles were then tested in the complex scenario, showing that the proposed approach can adapt to driver preferences and provide a solution close to the optimal solution given the defined safety constraints.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics [BITRE]: ‘Cost of road crashes in Australia 2006’. CanberraReport 118, 2009.
    2. 2)
      • 2. World Health Organization: ‘Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action’, 2013, Available at
    3. 3)
      • 3. Shinar, D.: ‘Psychology on the road, the human factor in traffic safety’ (John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 1978), p. 212.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Miller, G., Taubman – Ben-Ari, O.: ‘Driving styles among young novice drivers–The contribution of parental driving styles and personal characteristics’, Accid. Anal. Prevent., 2010, 42, (2), pp. 558570.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Son, J., Park, M., Oh, H.,, et al: ‘1G-33 age and gender difference in driving style and fuel efficiency on highway driving’, Jpn. J. Ergonom., 2013, 49, (Suppl.), pp. S548S551.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Rittger, D.M.L., Maag, C., Kiesel, A.: ‘Anger and bother experience when driving with a traffic light assistant: a multi-driver simulator study’, in de Waard, J.S.D., Röttger, S., Kluge, A., Manzey, D., Weikert, C., Hoonhout, H. (Ed.): ‘Human factors in high reliability industries’ (2015), pp. 4152.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Preuk, K., Stemmler, E., Schießl, C.,, et al: ‘Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles’ drivers?’, Accid. Anal. Prevent., 2016, 95, (Part A), pp. 149156.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Björklund, G.M., Åberg, L.: ‘Driver behaviour in intersections: formal and informal traffic rules’, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 2005, 8, (3), pp. 239253.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Martens, M.H.: ‘Stimuli fixation and manual response as a function of expectancies’, Hum. Factors, 2004, 46, (3), pp. 410423.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Muhrer, E., Vollrath, M.: ‘Expectations while car following–The consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task’, Accid. Anal. Prevent., 2010, 42, (6), pp. 21582164.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Eis, V., Sferco, R., Fay, P.A.: ‘A detailed analysis of the characteristics of European rear impacts’. Proc.: Int. Technical Conf. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, 2005, vol. 2005, pp. 9p9p.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Smart Cities and Communities – Key to Innovation Integrated Solution–Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems and Services (C-ITS), 2013. Available at
    13. 13)
      • 13. Saerens, B., Van den Bulck, E.: ‘Calculation of the minimum-fuel driving control based on pontryagin's maximum principle’, Transport. Res. D Transport Environ., 2013, 24, pp. 8997.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Mensing, F., Bideaux, E., Trigui, R.,, et al: ‘Trajectory optimization for eco-driving taking into account traffic constraints’, Transport. Res. D Transport Environ., 2013, 18, pp. 5561.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Glaser, S., Vanholme, B., Mammar, S.,, et al: ‘Maneuver-based trajectory planning for highly autonomous vehicles on real road with traffic and driver interaction’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst., 2010, 11, (3), pp. 589606.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Lim, H., Su, W., Mi, C.C.: ‘Distance-based ecological driving scheme using a two-stage hierarchy for long-term optimization and short-term adaptation’, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2017, 66, (3), pp. 19401949.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Moser, D., Schmied, R., Waschl, H.,, et al: ‘Flexible spacing adaptive cruise control using stochastic model predictive control’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2017, PP, (99), pp. 114.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Bonsall, P., Liu, R., Young, W.: ‘Modelling safety-related driving behaviour – impact of parameter values’, Transport. Res. A, 2005, 39, (1), pp. 425444.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Montemerlo, M.,, Becker, J., Bhat, S., et al: ‘Junior: the Stanford entry in the urban challenge’, J. Field Robot., 2008, 25, (9), pp. 569597.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Thrun, S.,, Montemerlo, M., Dahlkamp, H., et al: ‘Stanley: the robot that won the DARPA grand challenge’, J. Field Robot., 2006, 23, (9), pp. 661692.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Michon, J.A.: ‘A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do?’, in Evans, L., Schwing, R.C. (Eds.): ‘Human behavior and traffic safety’ (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1985), pp. 485524.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Glaser, S., Vanholme, B., Gruyer, D.,, et al: ‘Probability and risk based maneuver planning for collision avoidance’. Presented at the First Int. Symp. Future Active Safety Technology toward zero-traffic-accident, Tokyo, Japan, 5–9 September 2011.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Vogel, K.: ‘A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators’, Accid. Anal. Prevent., 2003, 35, (3), pp. 427433.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Hobbs, C.A., Mills, P.J.: ‘Injury probability for car occupants in frontal and side impacts’ (Transport and Road Research Laboratory. Road Safety Division, 1984).
    25. 25)
      • 25. Zeidler, F., Schreier, H., Stadelmann, R.: ‘Accident research and accident reconstruction by the EES-accident reconstruction method’. SAE Technical Paper, 1985.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Kesting, A., Treiber, M.: ‘Traffic flow dynamics: data, models and simulation(no. Book, Whole) (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013).
    27. 27)
      • 27. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: ‘Artificial intelligence: a modern approach(no. Book, Whole) (Pearson, Harlow, 2014).
    28. 28)
      • 28. Vanholme, B., Gruyer, D., Lusetti, B.,, et al: ‘Highly automated driving on highways based on legal safety’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst., 2013, 14, (1), pp. 333347.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Gipps, P.G.: ‘A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation’, Transport. Res. B Methodol., 1981, 15, (2), pp. 105111.
    30. 30)
      • 30. Queensland Government: ‘Safe following distances’, 2010. Available at
    31. 31)
      • 31. Kulmala, R.: ‘Ex-ante assessment of the safety effects of intelligent transport systems’, Accid. Anal. Prevent., 2010, 42, (4), pp. 13591369.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address