access icon openaccess Experimental study of the human factors when riding an automated wheelchair: supervision and acceptability of the automated system

This study investigated the effects of supervision on autonomous wheelchairs, which are considered to be a means of future transportation. A rider using an automated wheelchair needs to be vigilant about the failure modes of the system. This study focused on the effects of human factors on an automated system. Several experiments were conducted in public areas to investigate the influence of human factors including acceptability, capability, and usability on the supervision of an automated system by using questionnaires. The average reaction time from the occurrence of system failure until the emergency switch is activated was found to be similar in all the experiments for all test tracks. Regarding the positions of the subject's hand, several patterns for pushing the emergency switch were observed. The method of supervision for pushing the emergency switch was the same among all subjects, even though they had different attitudes. Most subjects had favourable opinions on the automated wheelchair, whereas some found the supervision bothersome. The results reveal the conditions under which future users would prefer to use the automated wheelchair, given the expected cost and functions. The real-world experimental data are valuable for developing automated wheelchairs and effective human–machine interfaces on automated systems.

Inspec keywords: user interfaces; human factors; wheelchairs; handicapped aids

Other keywords: future transportation; average reaction time; automated system acceptability; automated wheelchair; automated system supervision; human-machine interfaces; human factors

Subjects: Computer assistance for persons with handicaps; User interfaces; Ergonomic aspects of computing

References

    1. 1)
      • 18. Fitch, G., Kiefer, R., Hankey, J., et al: ‘Toward developing an approach for alerting drivers to the direction of a crash threat’, Hum. Factors, 2007, 49, (4), pp. 710720.
    2. 2)
      • 20. Tsukuba Designated Zone Council. Available at http://www.rt-tsukuba.jp/council/ (in Japanese), accessed September 2017.
    3. 3)
      • 22. ITS Japan. Available at http://www.its-jp.org/english/files/2015/04/SIP_Worlshop2015_leaflets_e_20150326.pdf, accessed September 2017.
    4. 4)
      • 8. Jackson, R.D.: ‘Robotics and its role in helping disabled people’, Eng. Sci. Educ. J., 1993, 2, (6), pp. 267272.
    5. 5)
      • 19. Omae, M., Hashimoto, N., Sugamoto, T., et al: ‘Measurement of driver's reaction time to failure of steering controller during automatic driving’, Rev. Automot. Eng., 2005, 26, (2), pp. 213215.
    6. 6)
      • 4. Chong, J., Qin, B., Bandyopadhyay, B., et al: ‘Automated personal vehicle for the first- and last-mile transportation services’. IEEE 5th Int. Conf. ProCybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS), 2008, vol. 2, issue 6, pp. 267272.
    7. 7)
      • 24. Rezazadeh, I., Firoozabadi, M., Hu, H., et al: ‘Co-adaptive and affective human-machine interface for improving training performances of virtual myoelectric forearm prosthesis’, IEEE Trans. Affective Comput., 2012, 3, (3), pp. 285297.
    8. 8)
      • 23. Hashimoto, N., Kato, S., Tsugawa, S.: ‘Gap acceptance on car following for aerodynamic drag reduction -relationships among gap distance, vehicle types, and driver characteristics’, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci., 2015, 98, (1), pp. 267274.
    9. 9)
      • 12. May, E., Garrett, R., Ballantyne, A.: ‘Being mobile: electric mobility-scooters and their use by older people’, Ageing Soc., 2010, 30, (7), pp. 12191237.
    10. 10)
      • 7. DeMaio, P.: ‘Bike-sharing: history, impacts, models of provision, and future’, J. Public Transp., 2009, 12, (4), pp. 4156.
    11. 11)
      • 3. Mineta Transportation Institute: ‘Using bicycles for the first and last mile of a commute’. Report No. S-09-02, 2009.
    12. 12)
      • 1. Cabinet Office: ‘White paper on traffic safety in Japan’, 2006, p. 11.
    13. 13)
      • 16. Hoeger, R., Amditis, A., Kunert, M., et al: ‘Highly automated vehicles for intelligent transport: HAVEit approach’. Proc. 15th ITS World Congress, 2008.
    14. 14)
      • 10. Tsugawa, S., Kato, S., Hashimoto, N., et al: ‘Elderly driver assistance systems with cooperation between vehicles: the concept and experiments’. Proc. Intelligent Vehicles Symp., 2007, pp. 668673.
    15. 15)
      • 2. Balcik, B., Beamon, B.M., Smilowitz, K.: ‘Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2008, 12, (2), pp. 5163.
    16. 16)
      • 14. Boyali, A., Hashimoto, N.: ‘Block-sparse representation classification based gesture recognition approach for a robotic wheelchair’. Proc. Intelligent Vehicles Symp., 2014, pp. 11331138.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Shladover, S.: ‘Challenges to evaluation of CO2 impacts of intelligent transportation systems’. Proc. IEEE Integrated and Sustainable Transportation System, 2011, pp. 189194.
    18. 18)
      • 9. Kuruparan, J.: ‘Semiautomated low cost wheelchair for elderly and disabled people’. Proc. Int. Conf. Information and Automation, 2006, pp. 104108.
    19. 19)
      • 11. Hashimoto, N., Tomita, K., Boyali, A., et al: ‘Surveillance of capability, acceptability, and usability of riding an autonomous wheelchair system in a public area’. Proc. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2016.
    20. 20)
      • 15. Hashimoto, N., Takinami, Y., Matsumoto, O.: ‘An experimental study on vehicle behaviour to wheelchairs and standing-type vehicles at intersection’. Proc. Int. Conf. ITS Telecommunication, 2013, pp. 350355.
    21. 21)
      • 13. Sua, F., Bellb, M.: ‘Transport for older people: characteristics and solutions’, Res. Transp. Econ., 2009, 25, (1), pp. 4655.
    22. 22)
      • 5. Song, L., Cherrett, T., McLeod, F., et al: ‘Addressing the last mile problem-transport impacts of collection and delivery points’, J. Transp. Res. Board, 2009, 2097, pp. 918.
    23. 23)
      • 21. US.DOT. Available at http://www.its.dot.gov/automated_vehicle/index.htm, accessed September 2017.
    24. 24)
      • 6. Ping, K., Wong, Y.: ‘Comparing pedestrians’ needs and behaviours in different land use environments’, J. Transp. Res. Board, 2013, 26, pp. 4350.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0040
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0040
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading