Experimental study of the human factors when riding an automated wheelchair: supervision and acceptability of the automated system
- Author(s): Naohisa Hashimoto 1 ; Kohji Tomita 1 ; Ali Boyali 2 ; Yusuke Takinami 1 ; Osamu Matsumoto 1
-
-
View affiliations
-
Affiliations:
1:
Robot Innovation Research Centre, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology , 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba , Japan ;
2: Intelligent System Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology , 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba , Japan
-
Affiliations:
1:
Robot Innovation Research Centre, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology , 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba , Japan ;
- Source:
Volume 12, Issue 3,
April
2018,
p.
236 – 241
DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2017.0040 , Print ISSN 1751-956X, Online ISSN 1751-9578
This is an open access article published by the IET under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Received
24/02/2017,
Accepted
25/10/2017,
Revised
12/09/2017,
Published
01/12/2017

Full text loading...
/deliver/fulltext/iet-its/12/3/IET-ITS.2017.0040.html;jsessionid=18deltkclaqm1.x-iet-live-01?itemId=%2fcontent%2fjournals%2f10.1049%2fiet-its.2017.0040&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
Inspec keywords: user interfaces; human factors; wheelchairs; handicapped aids
Other keywords: future transportation; average reaction time; automated system acceptability; automated wheelchair; automated system supervision; human-machine interfaces; human factors
Subjects: Computer assistance for persons with handicaps; User interfaces; Ergonomic aspects of computing
References
-
-
1)
-
1. Cabinet Office: ‘White paper on traffic safety in Japan’, 2006, p. 11.
-
-
2)
-
2. Balcik, B., Beamon, B.M., Smilowitz, K.: ‘Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2008, 12, (2), pp. 51–63.
-
-
3)
-
3. Mineta Transportation Institute: ‘Using bicycles for the first and last mile of a commute’. Report No. S-09-02, 2009.
-
-
4)
-
4. Chong, J., Qin, B., Bandyopadhyay, B., et al: ‘Automated personal vehicle for the first- and last-mile transportation services’. IEEE 5th Int. Conf. ProCybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS), 2008, vol. 2, issue 6, pp. 267–272.
-
-
5)
-
5. Song, L., Cherrett, T., McLeod, F., et al: ‘Addressing the last mile problem-transport impacts of collection and delivery points’, J. Transp. Res. Board, 2009, 2097, pp. 9–18.
-
-
6)
-
6. Ping, K., Wong, Y.: ‘Comparing pedestrians’ needs and behaviours in different land use environments’, J. Transp. Res. Board, 2013, 26, pp. 43–50.
-
-
7)
-
7. DeMaio, P.: ‘Bike-sharing: history, impacts, models of provision, and future’, J. Public Transp., 2009, 12, (4), pp. 41–56.
-
-
8)
-
8. Jackson, R.D.: ‘Robotics and its role in helping disabled people’, Eng. Sci. Educ. J., 1993, 2, (6), pp. 267–272.
-
-
9)
-
9. Kuruparan, J.: ‘Semiautomated low cost wheelchair for elderly and disabled people’. Proc. Int. Conf. Information and Automation, 2006, pp. 104–108.
-
-
10)
-
10. Tsugawa, S., Kato, S., Hashimoto, N., et al: ‘Elderly driver assistance systems with cooperation between vehicles: the concept and experiments’. Proc. Intelligent Vehicles Symp., 2007, pp. 668–673.
-
-
11)
-
11. Hashimoto, N., Tomita, K., Boyali, A., et al: ‘Surveillance of capability, acceptability, and usability of riding an autonomous wheelchair system in a public area’. Proc. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2016.
-
-
12)
-
12. May, E., Garrett, R., Ballantyne, A.: ‘Being mobile: electric mobility-scooters and their use by older people’, Ageing Soc., 2010, 30, (7), pp. 1219–1237.
-
-
13)
-
13. Sua, F., Bellb, M.: ‘Transport for older people: characteristics and solutions’, Res. Transp. Econ., 2009, 25, (1), pp. 46–55.
-
-
14)
-
14. Boyali, A., Hashimoto, N.: ‘Block-sparse representation classification based gesture recognition approach for a robotic wheelchair’. Proc. Intelligent Vehicles Symp., 2014, pp. 1133–1138.
-
-
15)
-
15. Hashimoto, N., Takinami, Y., Matsumoto, O.: ‘An experimental study on vehicle behaviour to wheelchairs and standing-type vehicles at intersection’. Proc. Int. Conf. ITS Telecommunication, 2013, pp. 350–355.
-
-
16)
-
16. Hoeger, R., Amditis, A., Kunert, M., et al: ‘Highly automated vehicles for intelligent transport: HAVEit approach’. Proc. 15th ITS World Congress, 2008.
-
-
17)
-
17. Shladover, S.: ‘Challenges to evaluation of CO2 impacts of intelligent transportation systems’. Proc. IEEE Integrated and Sustainable Transportation System, 2011, pp. 189–194.
-
-
18)
-
18. Fitch, G., Kiefer, R., Hankey, J., et al: ‘Toward developing an approach for alerting drivers to the direction of a crash threat’, Hum. Factors, 2007, 49, (4), pp. 710–720.
-
-
19)
-
19. Omae, M., Hashimoto, N., Sugamoto, T., et al: ‘Measurement of driver's reaction time to failure of steering controller during automatic driving’, Rev. Automot. Eng., 2005, 26, (2), pp. 213–215.
-
-
20)
-
20. Tsukuba Designated Zone Council. Available at http://www.rt-tsukuba.jp/council/ (in Japanese), accessed September 2017.
-
-
21)
-
21. US.DOT. Available at http://www.its.dot.gov/automated_vehicle/index.htm, accessed September 2017.
-
-
22)
-
22. ITS Japan. Available at http://www.its-jp.org/english/files/2015/04/SIP_Worlshop2015_leaflets_e_20150326.pdf, accessed September 2017.
-
-
23)
-
23. Hashimoto, N., Kato, S., Tsugawa, S.: ‘Gap acceptance on car following for aerodynamic drag reduction -relationships among gap distance, vehicle types, and driver characteristics’, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci., 2015, 98, (1), pp. 267–274.
-
-
24)
-
24. Rezazadeh, I., Firoozabadi, M., Hu, H., et al: ‘Co-adaptive and affective human-machine interface for improving training performances of virtual myoelectric forearm prosthesis’, IEEE Trans. Affective Comput., 2012, 3, (3), pp. 285–297.
-
-
1)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0040

Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0040
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
