Effects of predictive horizon on network performance under short-term predictive information

Effects of predictive horizon on network performance under short-term predictive information

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Providing predictive information is expected to be an effective way in reducing congestion because travellers can have information of future traffic conditions and plan their travel ahead of time. However, due to the complex and computational expense of traffic flow forecasting, only short horizon future travel times can be generated and provided, which seems not sufficient for travellers to accurately plan their travel along an entire path. In this study, the authors have developed a simulation model to investigate the impact that limited time-span predictions have on the effectiveness of the predictive information. The results indicate that even though the predicted horizon is very short, the predictive information can still perform better than the current prevailing information. Sensitivity analysis of market penetration rates and prediction horizons is also discussed. This study is expected to be guidance for practical implementation and operation of short-term predictive information scenarios.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Choi, K., Lee, C., Son, Y.: ‘Traffic information and some business models’, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 2001, 5, (2), pp. 113122.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Ben-Akiva, M., Kaysi, I.: ‘Dynamic network models and driver information systems’, Transp. Res. A, Policy Pract., 1991, 25, pp. 251266.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Ben-Akiva, M., de Palma, A., Kaysi, I.: ‘The impact of predictive information on guidance efficiency: an analytical approach’, in Bianco, L. (Ed.): ‘Advanced methods in transportation analysis’ (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996), pp. 413432.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Mahmassani, H., Lu, C., Dong, J.: ‘Value of information: provision of anticipatory descriptive travel information through a real-time traffic estimation and prediction system’. Proc. 12th World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems, San Francisco, CA, 2005.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Smith, B., Oswald, R.: ‘Meeting real–time traffic flow forecasting requirements with imprecise computations’, Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 2003, 18, (3), pp. 201213.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Yang, Z., Mei, D.: ‘Traffic flow prediction model for large-scale road network based on cloud computing’, Math. Probl. Eng., 2014, 2014, Article ID 926251, doi: 10.1155/2014/926251.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Mahmassani, H.: ‘Dynamic network traffic assignment and simulation methodology for advanced system management applications’, Netw. Spat. Econ., 2001, 1, (3–4), pp. 267292.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Oh, S., Byon, Y., Jang, K., et al: ‘Short-term travel-time prediction on highway: a review of the data-driven approach’, Transp. Rev., 2014, 35, (1), pp. 432.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Ben-Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M., Koutsopoulos, H.N., et al: ‘Real time simulation of traffic demand-supply interactions within DynaMIT’, in Gendreau, M., Lucotte, M. (Eds.): ‘Transportation and network analysis: current trends’ (Springer, USA, 2002), pp. 1936.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Vlahogianni, E., Karlaftis, M., Golias, J.: ‘Short-term traffic forecasting: where we are and where we're going’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2014, 43, pp. 319.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Bottom, J., Ben-Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M., et al: ‘Investigation of route guidance generation issues by simulation with DynaMIT’. Proc. of 14th Int. Symp. Transportation and Traffic Theory, New York, 1999, pp. 577600.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Emmerink, R., Axhausen, K., Nijkamp, P., et al: ‘The potential of information provision in a simulated road transport network with non-recurrent congestion’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 1995, 3, (5), pp. 293309.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Balakrishna, R., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Ben-Akiva, M., et al: ‘Simulation-based evaluation of advanced traveler information systems’, Transp. Res. Record, 2005, 1910, pp. 9098.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Guo, J., Huang, W., Wei, Y., et al: ‘Effect of time interval on speed estimation using single loop detector measurements’, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 2013, 17, (5), pp. 11301138.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Smith, L., Beckman, R., Anson, D., et al: ‘TRANSIMS: Transportation analysis and simulation system’. Fifth National Conf. Transportation Planning Methods Applications-Volume II, Seattle, Washington, 1995.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Chiu, Y., Bottom, J., Mahut, M., et al: ‘Dynamic traffic assignment: a primer’, Transp. Res. E, Circ., 2010, E-C153.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Bottom, J.: ‘Consistent anticipatory route guidance’. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2000.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Peeta, S., Mahmassani, H.: ‘System optimal and user equilibrium time-dependent traffic assignment in congested networks’, Ann. Oper. Res., 1995, 60, pp. 81113.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Nagel, K., Wolf, D., Wagner, P.: ‘Two-lane traffic rules for cellular automata: a systematic approach’, Phys. Rev. E, 1998, 58, (2), pp. 14251437.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Al-Deek, H., Khattak, A., Thananjeyan, P.: ‘A combined traveler behavior and system performance model with advanced traveler information systems’, Transp. Res. A, Policy Pract., 1998, 32, (7), pp. 479493.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address