When adaptive traffic control systems are deployed in the field, agencies install them for one of two reasons: (i) to cope with day-to-day traffic fluctuations and/or (ii) to address frequent but sudden cases with special traffic (incidents, inclement weather etc.). There is an ongoing debate among researchers in which of these two cases adaptive systems are more effective. Yet, no previous studies have examined this issue with enough rigour and attention. This study compares InSync adaptive traffic control system to three conventional time-of-day (TOD) signal timing plans in a microsimulation environment to address aforementioned research question. A comprehensive set of scenarios and performance measures has been prepared to evaluate, in microsimulation, operations of an adaptive system InSync on a 12-intersection corridor along SR-421 in Volusia County, FL. The Vissim model of SR-421 was carefully calibrated and validated to resemble the field conditions. The findings show that InSync outperformed the TOD signal timing plans on various spatial levels and its performance made bigger savings in the case of special non-recurring traffic conditions.

References

1. 1)
  - 1. Rhythm Engineering: http://rhythmtraffic.com, accessed January 2015.
2. 2)
  - 13. Hathaway, E., Urbanik, T., Tsoi, S. (Kittleson and Associates, Inc.): ‘Cornell Road InSync System Evaluation’. Project #11075 Memorandum. Prepared for ODOT, 2012.
3. 3)
  - 9. DKS Associates: ‘Evaluation of an adaptive traffic signal system – before and after study: Crow Canyon Road and Bollinger Canyon Road in San Ramon, California’. Report prepared for the City of San Ramon, 2010.
4. 4)
  - 4. Watling, D.: ‘Modelling responsive signal control and route choice. Volume 2: modelling transport systems’. Proc. 7th World Conf. on Transport Research, Sydney, Australia, July 1995, pp. 123–137.
5. 5)
  - 2. Stevanovic, A.: ‘Adaptive traffic control systems: domestic and foreign state of practice’. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice, Project 20-5: Synthesis Topic 40-03, National Academies of Sciences, 2010.
6. 6)
  - 15. Stevanovic, A.Z., Zlatkovic, M.: ‘Comparative evaluation of InSync and time-of-day signal timing plans’ (Rhythm Engineering, 2013).
7. 7)
  - 5. Smith, M.J., Liu, R., Mounce, R.: ‘Traffic control and route choice; capacity maximization and stability’. Proc. Int. Symp. on Transportation & Traffic Theory, Kobe, Japan, August 2015, pp. 556–577.
8. 8)
  - 12. TJKM Transportation Consultants: ‘Evaluation of main-street adaptive traffic signal system’. Report prepared for the City of Salinas, 2011.
9. 9)
  - 6. Chandra, R.J., Bley, J.W., Penrod, S.S., et al: ‘External Adaptive Control Systems and Methods’. 2012, US Patent No. 8103436 B1, http://www.google.com/patents/US8103436, accessed July 2012.
10. 10)
  - 7. Chandra, R.J., Bley, J.W., Penrod, S.S., et al: ‘Adaptive Control Systems and Methods’. US Patent No. 8050854 B1, http://www.google.com/patents/US8050854, accessed July 2012.
11. 11)
  - 14. HDR Inc.: ‘An unpublished study on InSync performance in Vissim’. http://fixcongestion.com/validation.htm, accessed July 2012.
12. 12)
  - 11. Pennoni Associates Inc.: ‘Traffic signal system comparison Route 202 and Gulph Road/Mall Boulevard Upper Merion Township, Montgomery County’. Report prepared for Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, 2010.
13. 13)
  - 10. HDR Engineering, Inc.: ‘US Route 17 adaptive traffic control system: Phase I before and after travel time and delay study’. Report for Town of Mt. Pleasant, SC, 2011.
14. 14)
  - 3. Stevanovic, A.Z., Kergaye, C., Stevanovic, J.: ‘Evaluating robustness of signal timings for conditions of varying traffic flows’, Transp. Res. Record, J. Transp. Res. Board, 2011, (2259), pp. 141–150.
15. 15)
  - 8. Hutton, J.M., Bokenkroger, C.D., Meyer, M.M.: ‘Evaluation of an adaptive traffic signal system: Route 291 in Lee's summit’ (Midwest Research Institute and Missouri Department of Transportation, 2012).
16. 16)
  - 16. Goodwin, L.C., Pisano, P.A.: ‘Weather responsive traffic signal control’, ITE J., 2004, 74, (6), p.28.

Comparison of adaptive traffic control benefits for recurring and non-recurring traffic conditions

References

Related content