Your browser does not support JavaScript!

GeoSRM – Online geospatial safety risk model for the GB rail network

GeoSRM – Online geospatial safety risk model for the GB rail network

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

RSSB and the University of Southampton's GeoData Institute have collaborated to research and develop a toolkit for managing large volumes of rail risk data. The pilot system encompasses concepts of highly complex geospatial ‘big data’, open standards, open source development tools and methodologies, and enables stakeholders to filter, analyse and visualise risk across the rail network, for a range of risk models. These include train derailments, suicides and passenger slip, trips and falls, and feature a wide range of spatially dependent parameters that affect the causal, escalation and consequence mechanisms. The risk has been calculated to a high resolution, splitting 2,100,000 m of track typically into 10 m sections. By creating geospatial representations of risk, the tool can help to identify risk hotspots and in this way contribute to the improvement of rail safety. Once scaled up to a National level and full range of risk models, the tool will deliver a powerful capability, unique across Europe. Further research is extending the prototype to incorporate live and historic environmental and related rail incident data to augment and improve the risk model.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 1. McNulty, R.: ‘Realising the potential of GB rail, final independent report of the rail value for money study’. Department of Transport, 2011.
    5. 5)
      • 19. Bedford, T., Cooke, R.: ‘Probabilistic risk analysis’ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 10. Thiebes, B., Bell, R., Glade, T., et al: ‘Integration of a limit-equilibrium model into a landslide early warning system’, J. Int. Consortium Landslides, 2014, 11, (5), pp. 859875.
    8. 8)
      • 6. Dennis, C., Somaiya, K.: ‘Development and Use of the UK Railway Network's Safety Risk Model’. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management: PSAM 7 – ESREL '04, Berlin, 2004.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 24. ATOC: ‘Timetable data’. Available at [Accessed 2013].
    11. 11)
      • 25. Tavistock Institute: ‘Improving suicide prevention methods on the rail network in Great Britain, annual report’. RSSB, London, 2013.
    12. 12)
      • 29. Cheng, D.: ‘Uncertainty analysis of large risk assessment models with applications to the rail safety & standards board safety risk model’ (Strathclyde University, Glasgow, 2009).
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 3. Griffin, D., Holloway, A.: ‘Route based risk estimation across the GB rail network using empirical bayes methods’, ESREL, 2012.
    15. 15)
      • 20. ORR: ‘Station usage 2013–14 data’. Available at [Accessed 2014].
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 32. Orr, H., Carling, P.: ‘HYSED report to Railtrack: North West Zone Earthworks – Climate and Hydrological Feasibility Study; Review of information and recommendations for early warning’, 2000.
    18. 18)
      • 26. Evidence Led Solutions: ‘Improving suicide prevention measures on the rail network in Great Britain, literature review’ (RSSB, London, 2012).
    19. 19)
      • 28. Network Rail: ‘All Level Crossing Risk Model’, 2014.
    20. 20)
      • 18. Vesely, W., Goldberg, F., Roberts, N., et al: ‘Fault Tree Handbook (NUREG-0492), Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, 1981.
    21. 21)
      • 2. Griffin, D.: ‘Geospatial modelling of rail safety hazards’ in Nowakowski, T., Młyńczak, M., Jodejko-Pietruczuk, A., Werbińska-Wojciechowska, S. (Eds.), ‘Safety and reliability: Methodology and Applications’, (london, 2014)pp. 16391649.
    22. 22)
      • 27. SOVRN Project, Railway Suicide: ‘An investigation of individial and organisational consequences’, in Sheffield, J.W. (Ed.), (Northend Ltd, 2003).
    23. 23)
      • 5. RSSB: ‘Safety risk model v8.1’, (London, 2014).
    24. 24)
      • 7. Atkinson, P., Clark, M.J., Lewis, H.G.: ‘State-of-the-art in risk mapping’. Government Office for Science, Great Britain, 2012.
    25. 25)
      • 22. RSSB: ‘Safety management information system’, (London, 2014).
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 4. RSSB: ‘Taking safe decisions – How Britain's railways take decisions that affect safety’, (London, 2014).
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 21. National Rail: ‘Station Maps’. Available at [Accessed 2014].
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 23. RIDDOR: ‘The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations. No. 1471’, 2013.
    32. 32)
      • 30. Pennington, C., Dijkstra, T., Lark, M., et al: ‘Antecedent precipitation as a potential proxy for landslide incidence in South West United Kingdom’, in Sassa, K., Canuti, P., Yin, Y., (Eds.), ‘Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment’, (Springer, 2014), pp. 253259.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address