© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Terrorist attacks pose a serious threat to the EU, particularly in public transport (PT) hubs such as railway stations due to their level of accessibility and where the individual passenger security screening methods used in airports are impractical. Consequently, methods of increasing station resilience against terrorist attacks in Europe have been explored as part of the recent SecureStation project. To support this work, PT passengers from across Europe were surveyed to gauge their opinion on current counter-terrorism security measures in stations and the acceptability and perceived effectiveness of potential security enhancements. The results, from a total sample of 489 respondents, provide indications of passenger priorities, their opinions of current station security, the acceptability of different security measures and the degree to which they increase feelings of safety. The results, together with summaries of similar studies, give an overview of passenger acceptance of various counter-terrorism security measures and point to areas for further research.
References
-
-
1)
-
4. Powell, R.: ‘Defending against terrorist attacks with limited resources’, Am. Political Sci. Rev., 2007, 101, pp. 527–541 (doi: 10.1017/S0003055407070244).
-
2)
-
7. Ragozin, L.: ‘Volgograd train station rocked by suicide bombing’, in Rusbridger, , A. (Eds.): ‘The Guardian’ (Guardian News and Media, , 2013).
-
3)
-
20. Donabie, A.: ‘Social trends 41: transport’ (Office for National Statistics, 2011).
-
4)
-
9. FEMA: ‘FEMA 426: Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings’ (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, 2011).
-
5)
-
2. Stewart, M.G.: ‘Cost effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies for protection of buildings against terrorist attack’, J. Perform. Constructed Facil., 2008, 22, pp. 115–120 (doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:2(115)).
-
6)
-
19. Harper, S.: ‘Impact of predicted demographic change on Great Britain's Railways: employers and service providers’ (Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB), 2007).
-
7)
-
5. Rossiter, A., Dresner, M.: ‘The impact of the September 11th security fee and passenger wait time on traffic diversion and highway fatalities’, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2004, 10, pp. 225–230 (doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2004.02.001).
-
8)
-
10. RIBA: ‘RIBA Guidance on designing for counter-terrorism’ (Royal Institute of British Architects, 2010).
-
9)
-
8. Cormie, D., Mays, G., Smith, P.: ‘Blast effects on buildings: design of buildings to optimize resistance to blast loading’ (Thomas Telford Books, London, 2009, 2nd edn.).
-
10)
-
1. Arnold, J.J., Tsai, M.-C., Halpern, P., et al: ‘Mass-casualty, terrorist bombings: epidemiological outcomes, resource utilization, and time course of emergency needs (Part 1)’, Prehosp. Disaster Med., 2003, 18, pp. 220–234.
-
11)
-
21. MacIntosh, S., Deming, R., Hansen, T., et al: ‘Detection of person borne IEDs using multiple cooperative sensors’. Proc. SPIE 8019, Sensors, and Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C3I) Technologies for Homeland Security and Homeland Defense X, 2011.
-
12)
-
13. Kappia, J.G., Fletcher, D., Bosher, L., et al: ‘The acceptability of counter-terrorism measures on urban mass transit in the UK’, WIT Trans. Built Environ., 2009, 107, pp. 627–636 (doi: 10.2495/UT090561).
-
13)
-
6. Mueller, J., Stewart, M.G.: ‘Balancing the risks, benefits and costs of homeland security’, Homeland Secur. Affairs J., 2011, 7, , pp. 1–27.
-
14)
-
3. Ganor, B.: ‘Chapter 2: trends in modern international terrorism’, in Weisburd, D., Feucht, T., Hakimi, I., et al (Eds.): ‘To protect and to serve: policing in an age of terrorism’ (Springer, 2011).
-
15)
-
16. Turley, C., Stone, V.: ‘Sniffer dogs trials (London and Brighton)’ (Department for Transport, 2006).
-
16)
-
15. Turley, C., Stone, V.: ‘Security screening trial at Canary Wharf station’ (Department for Transport, 2006).
-
17)
-
12. Coaffee, J., Moore, C., Fletcher, D., et al: ‘Resilient design for community safety and terror-resistant cities’, Proc. ICE, Municipal Eng., 2008, 161, pp. 103–110 (doi: 10.1680/muen.2008.161.2.103).
-
18)
-
11. , et al: ‘SecureStation design guidelines for railway station security’ University of Sheffield (European Commission, 2014).
-
19)
-
18. Viscusi, W.K., Zeckhauser, R.J.: ‘Sacrificing civil liberties to reduce terrorism risks’, J. Risk Uncertain., 2003, 26, pp. 99–120 (doi: 10.1023/A:1024111622266).
-
20)
-
17. Potoglou, D., Robinson, N., Kim, C.W., et al: ‘Quantifying individual's trade-offs between privacy, liberty and security: the case of rail travel in UK’, Transp. Res. A, 2010, 44, (3), pp. 169–181.
-
21)
-
14. Turley, C., Stone, V.: ‘Security screening trial at Heathrow Express’ (Department for Transport, 2006).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2015.0031
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2015.0031
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6