Vehicular control delay is important in evaluating the level of service and designing or adjusting the control schemes at signalised intersections. Although control delay may be obtained directly or indirectly nowadays for vehicles with global positioning system (GPS) or at locations with designated sensor types and configurations, such data are still not widely available. The analytical and empirical procedures for control delay estimation are still important, particularly in developing countries. However, very few studies explored the effectiveness of existing control delay estimation methods. This study intends to address this issue by comparing the delays estimated by four commonly adopted models using field data observed from three signalised intersections in Shanghai. Specifically, the study compares the delay estimates from deterministic queuing model, Webster model, highway capacity manual (HCM) 2000 model, and Shanghai adjusted model. The results indicate that HCM 2000 model and Shanghai adjusted model perform similarly and satisfactorily under various v/c ratios while deterministic queuing model has better performance when the v/c ratio is extremely high, but Webster model is mostly inadequate at coordinated signalised intersections. Meanwhile, signal progression, initial queue, proportion of vehicles arriving on green are found as main influential factors to the precision of models based on data analysis.

References

1. 1)
  - 7. Ban, X., Herring, R., Hao, P., et al: ‘Delay pattern estimation for signalized intersections using sampled travel times’, Transp. Res. Rec., J. Transp. Res. Board, 2009, (2130), pp. 109–119 (doi: 10.3141/2130-14).
2. 2)
  - 5. Forbush, T.R., Saito, M.: ‘Developing algorithms for real-time delay estimation at signalized intersections using vehicle arrival and departure times’. 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, United States, January 2013.
3. 3)
  - 14. Wagner, P., Gartner, N.H., Lu, T., et al: ‘Webster's delay formula–revisited’. 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, United States, January 2014.
4. 4)
  - 9. Zhang, H., Li, K., Qian, H., et al: ‘Signal control intersection delay detecting based on video double section’, J. Tongji Univ., Nat. Sci., 2011, 39, (7), pp. 1013–1018.
5. 5)
  - 10. Zheng, J., Ma, X., Wu, Y., et al: ‘Measuring signalized intersection performance in real-time with traffic sensors’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., Technol. Plan. Oper., 2013, 17, (4), pp. 304–316 (doi: 10.1080/15472450.2013.771105).
6. 6)
  - 16. Webster, F.V.: ‘Traffic signal settings’. Road Research Technical Paper 39, Road Research Laboratory, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, United Kingdom, 1958.
7. 7)
  - 19. Fambro, D.B., Rouphail, N.M.: ‘Generalized delay model for signalized intersections and arterial streets’, Transp. Res. Record, J. Transp. Res. Board, 1997, (1572), pp. 112–121 (doi: 10.3141/1572-14).
8. 8)
  - 4. Hoover, C., Holmes, R.: ‘Using GPS data to calculate delay time on classified roads in the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area’. 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, United States, January 2013.
9. 9)
  - 20. Kimber, R.M., Hollis, E.M.: ‘Traffic queues and delays at road junctions’, LR909 Monograph, (Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, United Kingdom, 1979).
10. 10)
  - 8. Brennan, T.M.Jr., Ernst, J.M., Day, C.M., et al: ‘Influence of vertical sensor placement on data collection efficiency from bluetooth MAC address collection devices’, J. Transp. Eng., 2010, 136, (12), pp. 1104–1109 (doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000178).
11. 11)
  - 13. Shen, L., Liu, H.: ‘Applicability study of different control delay calculation methods’, J. Tongji Univ., Nat. Sci., 2012, 40, (4), pp. 559–563.
12. 12)
  - 1. Akcelik, R., Rouphail, N.M.: ‘Estimation of delays at traffic signals for variable demand conditions’, Transp. Res. B, Methodol., 1993, 27B, (2), pp. 109–131 (doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(93)90003-S).
13. 13)
  - 15. TRB: ‘Highway capacity manual 1997’ (Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., United States, 1997).
14. 14)
  - 3. Mousa, R.M.: ‘Analysis and modeling of measured delays at isolated signalized intersections’, J. Transp. Eng., 2002, 128, (4), pp. 347–354 (doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:4(347)).
15. 15)
  - 18. McShane, W.R., Roess, R.P.: ‘Traffic engineering’ (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, United States, 1990).
16. 16)
  - 21. TRB: ‘Highway capacity manual 2000’ (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, United States, 2000).
17. 17)
  - 22. Wu, B., Li, Y.: ‘Traffic management and control’ (China Communications Press, Beijing, China, 2009).
18. 18)
  - 17. Akcelik, R.: ‘The highway capacity manual delay formula for signalized intersections’, ITE J., 1988, 58, (3), pp. 23–27.
19. 19)
  - 2. Quiroga, C., Bullock, D.: ‘Measuring control delay at signalized intersections’, J. Transp. Eng., 1999, 125, (4), pp. 271–280 (doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:4(271)).
20. 20)
  - 12. Chen, S., Guo, J., Wang, X., et al: ‘Analysis and simulation on signalized intersection delay’, J. Beijing Jiaotong Univ., 2005, 29, (3), pp. 77–80.
21. 21)
  - 6. Dion, F., Rakha, H., Kang, Y.S.: ‘Comparison of delay estimates at under-saturated and over-saturated pre-timed signalized intersections’, Transp. Res. B, Methodol., 2004, 38, (2), pp. 99–122 (doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00003-1).
22. 22)
  - 2. Saito, M., Walker, J., Zundel, A.: ‘Use of image analysis to estimate average stopped delays per vehicle at signalized intersections’, Transp. Res. Rec., J. Transp. Res. Board, 2001, (1776), pp. 106–113 (doi: 10.3141/1776-14).

Comparison of delay estimation models for signalised intersections using field observations in Shanghai

References

Related content