Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Does gender make a difference to performing in-vehicle tasks?

  • Author(s): Yan Yang 1 ; Alan Wong 2 ; Mike McDonald 2
    • View affiliations
    • Affiliations: 1: School of Information Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, People's Republic of China;
      2: Transportation Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
  • Source: Volume 9, Issue 4, May 2015, p. 359 – 365
    DOI:  10.1049/iet-its.2013.0117 , Print ISSN 1751-956X, Online ISSN 1751-9578
© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Received 30/06/2013, Accepted 01/07/2014, Revised 16/06/2014, Published 17/10/2014

This study describes the gender differences in driving and visual behaviour observed under a high mental workload. The impacts of performing a set of in-vehicle auditory tasks on the behaviour of 34 drivers were studied in an on-road experiment using an instrumented vehicle. The results show that female participants tended to drive more attentively in baseline driving than males, but they were also more affected by the higher workload. The latter effect was identified by an increase in steering wheel adjustments and a slightly lower auditory task performance. Females adopted a more conservative coping strategy to compensate for the higher workload, as identified by increased headways and more stable lateral control. By contrast, male drivers did not appear to be affected in the same way, but their eye movements revealed significant gaze concentration and less mirror-checking. This suggests that male drivers may be less aware of the impact of mental distractions on their driving performance and visual behaviour, and adopt a simplification strategy to cope with the extra workload. These gender differences in behaviours and coping strategies can be explained only through a combination of traditional measurements and drivers' eye movements, which provide a supplementary measure for understanding driving behaviour. Increased understandings of such gender differences may have significant implications for the design and safe operation of future in-vehicle technologies.

Inspec keywords: driver information systems; behavioural sciences computing; gender issues

Other keywords: on-road experiment; driver eye movements; gender differences; mental workload; steering wheel adjustments; male drivers; in-vehicle auditory tasks; visual behaviour; coping strategy; stable lateral control; gaze concentration; mirror-checking; mental distractions; driving behaviour

Subjects: Economic, social and political aspects of computing; Traffic engineering computing; Social and behavioural sciences computing

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • 46. Stern, J.A., Boyer, D., Schroeder, D.: ‘Blink rate: a possible measure of fatigue’, Hum. Factors., J. Hum. Factors Erg. Soc., 1994, 36, (2), pp. 285–297.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 24. Angell, L., Auflick, J., Austria, P.A., et al: ‘Driver workload metrics project–Task 2’, Final Report, NHTSA, 2006.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 7. Cnossen, F., Brookhuis, K.A., Meijman, T.: ‘The effects of in-car information systems on mental workload: A driving simulator study’, in Brookhuis, K.A., deWaard, D., Weikert, C.M. (Eds.): ‘Simulators and traffic psychology’ (Centre for Environmental and Traffic Psychology, Groningen, 1997), pp. 151–163.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 26. Department for Transport: ‘Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB), Standards for Highways’ (UK, 2011), Available at: http://www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/dmrb/.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 30. Recarte, M.A., Perez, E., Conchillo, A., et al: ‘Mental workload and visual impairment: differences between pupil, blink, and subjective rating’, Span. J. Psychol., 2008, 11, (2), pp. 374–385.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 45. Putrevu, S.: ‘Exploring the origins and information processing differences between men and women: implications for advertisers’, Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev., 2001, 10, (1), pp. 1–14.
    16. 16)
      • 32. Navidi, W.C.: ‘Statistics for engineers and scientists’ (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008).
    17. 17)
      • 48. Yang, Y., Reimer, B., Mehler, B., et al: ‘Are drivers aware of their behavior changes when using in-vehicle systems’. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conf. (ITSC), Alaska, USA, 2012.
    18. 18)
      • 21. McDonald, M., Brackston, M.: ‘The role of the instrumented vehicle in the collection of data on driver behaviour’, IEE Colloq. Monit. Driver Veh. Perform., 1997, 122, pp. 7/1–3.
    19. 19)
      • 9. Wickens, C.D.: ‘Engineering psychology and human performance’ (Harper Collins, New York, 1984, 2nd edn.).
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • 35. Abdi, H.: ‘The bonferroni and šidák corrections for multiple comparisons, in encyclopedia of measurement and statistics’, Salkind, N.: (Ed.) (Sage, Thousand Oaks (CA), 2007).
    22. 22)
      • 25. David Tucker Associates: ‘ABP Southampton–Berth 201/202 Works_Appendix M–Transport Assessment’, (Southampton, 2011), p. 23.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 33. Osborne, J.W., Overbay, A.: ‘The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them)’, Pract. Asses. Res. Eval., 2004, 9, (6), pp. 1–10.
    25. 25)
      • 37. Wickens, C.D.: ‘Information processing, decision making and cognition’, in Salvendy, G.: (Ed.) ‘Cognitive engineering in the design of human–computer interaction and expert systems’ (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987).
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 3. Mosedale, J., Purdy, A., Clarkson, E.: ‘Contributory factors to road accidents’. Transport Statistics: Road safety, Department for Transport, 2004.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 28. Brookhuis, K.A., De Waard, D.: ‘Why is driver impairment difficult to assess?’, in Rothengatter, T., Huguenin, R.D. (Eds.): ‘Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Applications’ (Oxford, Elsevier, 2004), pp. 231–244.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 23. Jamson, A.H., Merat, N.: ‘Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving’, Transp. Res. F, 2005, 8, (2), pp. 76–96.
    32. 32)
      • 16. Dorn, L., Glendon, A.I., Hoyes, T.W., et al: ‘Group differences in driving performance’. Behavioural Research on Road Safety II, Manchester University, 1991.
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
      • 5. Wickens, C.D.: ‘Engineering psychology and human performance’ (HarperCollins, New York, 1992).
    35. 35)
      • 36. Yang, Y., Reimer, B., Mehler, B., et al: ‘Exploring differences in the impact of auditory and visual demands on driver behavior’. Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Conf., ACM, Portsmouth, NH, USA, 2012.
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
      • 2. Östlund, J., Nilsson, L., Carsten, O., et al: ‘HASTE deliverable 2: HMI and safety-related driver performance’. Institute for Transportation Studies, University of Leeds, 2004.
    39. 39)
      • 1. Green, P.: ‘Estimating compliance with the 15-second rule for driver-interface usability and safety’. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 1999.
    40. 40)
      • 43. Burns, P.C., Parkes, A., Burton, S., et al: ‘How dangerous is driving with a mobile phone? Benchmarking the impairment to alcohol’. Crowthorne, 2002.
    41. 41)
      • 44. Faulks, I.J., Irwin, J.D., Chekaluk, E.: ‘Difference in response of male and female drivers to everyday distractions'. Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, 2009.
    42. 42)
    43. 43)
      • 34. Barnett, V., Lewis, T.: ‘Outliers in statistical data’ (Wiley, New York, 1994, 3rd edn.).
    44. 44)
      • 22. Seeing Machines: ‘FaceLAB5 User Manual’ (Canberra, Australia, 2009).
    45. 45)
    46. 46)
    47. 47)
      • 38. Young, K., Lee, J.D., Regan, M.A.: ‘Driver distraction: theory, effects, and mitigation’ (CRC Press, 2008).
    48. 48)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0117
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0117
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
Print this page
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address