© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
In this study, a multi-stakeholder/multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) is applied to obtain a selection and preliminary ranking for a number of alternative ways to design innovative ITS-based tools that have the potential to improve road safety by creating a more forgiving road (FOR) and a more self-explaining road (SER) environment. The aim of this MCA is to allow various stakeholders with an interest in improving road safety (in particular public policymakers, but also users and manufacturers), to assess alternative designs for future FOR and SER environments. For each of these stakeholders a separate MCA is carried out taking into account their specific objectives. By analysing the differences in preferences among stakeholders and using the highest expected ‘value-added’ from the community of stakeholders in its entirety on various FOR and SER environments, it has been possible to uncover information on the chances of successful implementation.
References
-
-
1)
-
5. Theeuwes, J., Godthelp, J.: ‘Begrijpelijkheid van de weg’. .
-
2)
-
7. Macharis, C., Lebeau, K., Turcksin, L.: ‘Multi Actor Multi Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: state of use’, Decis. Support Syst., 2012, 54, (1), pp. 610–620 (doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008).
-
3)
-
14. Macharis, C.: ‘The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport: The MAMCA methodology’. , pp. 114–126.
-
4)
-
22. Saaty, T.L.: ‘Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process’, Manage. Sci., 1986, 32, (7), pp. 841–855 (doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841).
-
5)
-
6. Macharis, C., De Witte, A., Ampe, J.: ‘The multi-actor, multi-criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: theory and practice’, J. Adv. Transp., 2007, 43, (2), pp. 183–202 (doi: 10.1002/atr.5670430206).
-
6)
-
18. Wiethoff, M., Brookhuis, K., de Waard, D., et al: ‘A methodology for improving road safety by novel infrastructural and invehicle technology combinations’, Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 2012, 4, (2), pp. 67–77 (doi: 10.1007/s12544-011-0065-2).
-
7)
-
8. Turcksin, L., Macharis, C., Lebeau, K., et al: ‘A multi-actor multi-criteria analysis to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options: the case of Belgium’, Energy Policy, 2010, 39, pp. 200–214 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.033).
-
8)
-
10. De Brucker, K., Macharis, C., Verbeke, A.: ‘Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: a stakeholder management approach’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2013, 224, pp. 122–131 (doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021).
-
9)
-
23. Saaty, T.L.: ‘Decision making for leaders’ (RWS Publications, 1995).
-
10)
-
10. De Brucker, K., Macharis, C., Verbeke, A.: ‘Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: a stakeholder management approach’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2013, 224, pp. 122–131 (doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021).
-
11)
-
19. Wiethoff, M., de Waard, D., Wenzel, G., et al: ‘Expected safety effects for driver assistance systems’. Proc. Int. Conf. on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transport (AATT) Conf., Athens, Greece, May 2008.
-
12)
-
6. Macharis, C., De Witte, A., Ampe, J.: ‘The multi-actor, multi-criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: theory and practice’, J. Adv. Transp., 2007, 43, (2), pp. 183–202 (doi: 10.1002/atr.5670430206).
-
13)
-
8. Turcksin, L., Macharis, C., Lebeau, K., et al: ‘A multi-actor multi-criteria analysis to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options: the case of Belgium’, Energy Policy, 2010, 39, pp. 200–214 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.033).
-
14)
-
5. Theeuwes, J., Godthelp, J.: ‘Begrijpelijkheid van de weg’. .
-
15)
-
15. Macharis, C., Verbeke, A., De Brucker, K.: ‘The strategic evaluation of new technologies through multicriteria analysis: the ADVISORS case’, in Bekiaris, E., Nakanishi, Y.J. (Eds.): ‘Economic impacts of intelligent transportation systems. Innovations and case studies’ (Elsevier, 2004), pp. 443–462.
-
16)
-
3. Bekiaris, E., Gaitanidou, E.: ‘Towards forgiving and self-explanatory roads’, in Bekiaris, E., Wiethoff, M., Gaitanidou, E. (Eds.): ‘Infrastructure and safety in a collaborative world: road traffic safety’ (Springer, 2011), pp. 15–22.
-
17)
-
9. Charness, A., Cooper, W.W.: ‘Management models and industrial applications of linear programming’ (Wiley, 1961).
-
18)
-
20. Wiethoff, M., Brookhuis, K., de Waard, D., et al: ‘New concepts for driver assistance systems to improve road safety’, in Hilferink, P., Rietveld, P., van den Hanenberg, P. (Eds.): ‘Proc. of the BIVEC-GIBET Transport Research Day 2007’ (Nautilus Academic Books, 2007), pp. 389–402.
-
19)
-
22. Saaty, T.L.: ‘Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process’, Manage. Sci., 1986, 32, (7), pp. 841–855 (doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841).
-
20)
-
14. Macharis, C.: ‘The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport: The MAMCA methodology’. , pp. 114–126.
-
21)
-
13. Forman, E.H., Selly, M.A.: ‘Decision by objectives. How to convince others that you are right’ (World Scientific, 2001).
-
22)
-
11. Macharis, C., Stevens, A., De Brucker, K., Verbeke, A.: ‘A multicriteria approach to the strategic assessment of advanced driver assistance systems’, in: Jourquin, B., Rietveld, P., Westin, P. (Eds.): ‘Transportation economics. towards better performance systems’ (Routledge-Taylor & Francis Books, 2006), pp. 348–373.
-
23)
-
24. Saaty, T.L.: ‘The analytic hierarchy and analytic hierarchy network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision making’, in Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, E. (Eds.): ‘Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys’ (Springer, 2005), pp. 345–407.
-
24)
-
21. Freeman, E.R.: ‘Strategic management: a stakeholder approach’ (Pitman/Ballinger, 1984).
-
25)
-
18. Wiethoff, M., Brookhuis, K., de Waard, D., et al: ‘A methodology for improving road safety by novel infrastructural and invehicle technology combinations’, Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 2012, 4, (2), pp. 67–77 (doi: 10.1007/s12544-011-0065-2).
-
26)
-
17. Hacker, W.: ‘Allgemeine arbeitspsychologie’ (Huber, 2005).
-
27)
-
12. Commons, J.: ‘Institutional economics. Its place in political economy’ (The University of Wisconsin Press, 1934).
-
28)
-
29)
-
7. Macharis, C., Lebeau, K., Turcksin, L.: ‘Multi Actor Multi Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: state of use’, Decis. Support Syst., 2012, 54, (1), pp. 610–620 (doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008).
-
30)
-
31)
-
16. North, D.: ‘Institutions, institutional change and economic history’ (Norton, 1990).
-
32)
-
4. Wegman, F., Aarts, L.: .
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2012.0171
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2012.0171
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6