Reported use of speed control systems: cruise control and speed limiter

Reported use of speed control systems: cruise control and speed limiter

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study presents results from focus group sessions conducted in six countries, namely, Austria, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Portugal and Spain. The work was conducted within the framework of the European project INTERACTION, and the main aim was to collect the opinions of drivers that had cruise control and speed limiter systems available for more than 1 year. A constant comparison analysis was performed and content categories compared among the sessions. This technique allowed assessing whether themes that emerged from one group also emerged in another. Results provide insights into the motives underlying system use and their effects on driving behaviour. A higher percentage of drivers reported using cruise control more frequently than speed limiter. Moreover, drivers having both systems used cruise control significantly more than speed limiter. Statements of ‘dislike’ were documented for speed limiter in several group sessions. Although drivers had the systems available for more than 1 year, lack of knowledge regarding specific system functioning was apparent. Reports of trial-and-error learning in real driving conditions, experience of critical situations and performance of secondary tasks with both systems active are discussed in this study.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Aupetit, S., Riff, J.: ‘Approche ergonomique de l'usage du régulateur de vitesse conventionnel: analyse critique de la littérature scientifique’, Activités, 2010, 7, (2), pp. 104123.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Bauer, A., Gail, J., Lorig, M., , et al.: ‘Impact of cruise control on traffic safety, energy consumption and environmental pollution’. IMPROVER, 2006, Subproject 3, 2006.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Bonnard, A., Karmann, N., Lancelle, V., Brusque, C.: ‘Terminology definition and selection of in-vehicle technologies to investigate’. INTERACTION Project, 2009, Deliverable nr. 13, 2009.
    4. 4)
      • 4. van Kampen, L.: ‘Cruise control in personenauto's: een literatuur-orientatie op verkeersveiligheidsaspecten(SWOV, 1996, R-96–21). Cited byBauer, A., Gail, J., Lorig, M., et al: ‘Impact of cruise control on traffic safety, energy consumption and environmental pollution(IMPROVER, 2006, Subproject 3).
    5. 5)
      • 5. Lheureux, F., Saad, F., Pianelli, C., Abric, J.-C., Roland, J.: ‘Behavioural changes due to long term use of speed limiter and cruise control(AIDE, 2006, D 1.2.4), pp. 3964.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Regan, M., Young, K.: ‘Use of manual speed alerting and cruise control devices by drivers in New South Wales’. Monash University Accident Research Centre, 2004.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Young, K., Regan, M.A.: ‘Use of manual speed alerting and cruise control devices by car drivers’, Saf. Sci., 2007, 45, (4), pp. 473485 (doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.002).
    8. 8)
      • 8. Saad, F., Dionisio, C., Arslanian, E., et al: ‘Learning phase and short term behavioural effect of speed limiter and cruise control systems’, in: Brouwer, R., Hoedemaeker, D. (Eds.): ‘Driver support and information systems: experiments on learning, appropriation and effects of adaptiveness’ (AIDE D1.2.3, 2006), pp. 1946.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Várhelyi, A., Mäkinen, T.: ‘The effects of in-cars speed limiters: field studies’, Transp. Res. C, 2001, 9, pp. 191211 (doi: 10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00025-5).
    10. 10)
      • 10. Comte, S., Wardman, M., Whelan, G.: ‘Drivers’ acceptance of automatic speed limiters: implications for policy and implementation’, Transp. Policy, 2000, 7, pp. 259267 (doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00017-2).
    11. 11)
      • 11. Cooper, L., Baber, C.: ‘Focus groups’, in: Stanton, N., Hedge, A., Brookhuis, K., Salas, E., Hendrick, H. (Eds.): ‘Handbook of human factors and ergonomics’ (CRC Press, 2005), pp. 32.132.7.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Young, K., Regan, M., Mitsopoulos, E., Haworth, N.: ‘Acceptability of in-vehicle intelligent transport systems to young novice drivers in New South Wales’. Monash University Accident Research Centre, 2003.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, I., Nilsson, L.: ‘Exploring end-user experiences: self-perceived notions on use of adaptive cruise control systems’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2010, 5, (2), pp. 134140 (doi: 10.1049/iet-its.2010.0116).
    14. 14)
      • 14. Krueger, R., Casey, M.A.: ‘Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research’ (SAGE, 2009, 4th edn.).
    15. 15)
      • 15. Onwuegbuzie, A., Dickinson, W., Leech, N., Zoran, A.: ‘A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research’, Int. J. Qual. Methods, 2009, 8, (3), pp. 121.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Duggleby, W.: ‘What about focus group interaction data?’, Qual. Health Res., 2005, 15, pp. 832840 (doi: 10.1177/1049732304273916).
    17. 17)
      • 17. Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: ‘The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research’ (Aldine Transaction, 1967).
    18. 18)
      • 18. Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: ‘What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving’, Transp. Res. F, 2007, 10, pp. 187200 (doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2006.09.004).
    19. 19)
      • 19. Leech, N., Onwuegbuzie, A.: ‘Qualitative data analysis: a compendium of techniques for school psychology research and beyond’, Sch. Psychol. Q., 2008, 23, pp. 587604 (doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.587).
    20. 20)
      • 20. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: ‘Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory’ (SAGE, 1998).
    21. 21)
      • 21. Vlassenroot, S., Marchau, V., De Mol, J., Brookhuis, K., Witlox, F.: ‘Potential for in-car speed assistance systems: results of a large-scale survey in Belgium and the Netherlands’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2011, 5, (1), pp. 8089 (doi: 10.1049/iet-its.2010.0041).
    22. 22)
      • 22. Pereira, M., Hamama, H., Dapzol, N., Bruyas, M.-P., Simoes, A.: ‘Simultaneous interaction with in-vehicle systems while turning left: comparison among three groups of drivers’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2009, 3, (4), pp. 369378 (doi: 10.1049/iet-its.2008.0091).
    23. 23)
      • 23. Hoel, J., Jaffard, M., Boujon, C., Van Elslande, P.: ‘Different forms of attentional disturbances involved in driving accidents’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2011, 5, (2), pp. 120126 (doi: 10.1049/iet-its.2010.0109).
    24. 24)
      • 24. Patten, C.J.D., Kircher, A., Ostlund, J., Nilsson, L.: ‘Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2004, 36, pp. 341350 (doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00014-9).
    25. 25)
      • 25. Shinar, D., Tractinsky, N., Compton, R.: ‘Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving’, Accident Anal. Prev., 2005, 37, pp. 315326 (doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.09.007).

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address