Speed impacts of an icy curve warning system

Speed impacts of an icy curve warning system

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Icy pavements can impair the ability of drivers to operate their vehicles safely. The California Department of Transportation has deployed an icy curve warning system (ICWS) on a five-mile segment of SR 36 in Lassen County. This section of roadway has a history as a high-crash location with fatal crashes, the vast majority of which occurred during icy pavement. The objective of this study was to evaluate operational effects of the ICWS, specifically on speeds during various conditions. The results of statistical analysis found that mean speeds were significantly different by greater than 5 mph when the system was on against off in general, as well as when examined by day and night. Mean speeds were significantly reduced by greater than 5 mph during wet weather (during day and night). The real interest of the evaluation was the system's impacts on reducing speeds during conditions when ice was present but unexpected (called clear, cold and not dry in this work). Statistical analysis found that mean speed reductions were significant by greater than 3 mph (but less than 5 mph) when the system was on both during the day and at night. Consequently, the ICWS appears to reduce speeds by approximately 3 mph in conditions where icy roads are unexpected.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Koetse, M.J., Rietveld, P.: ‘The impact of climate change and weather on transport: An overview of empirical findings’, Transp. Res. D, 2009, 14, pp. 205221 (doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2008.12.004).
    2. 2)
      • 2. Kyte, M., Khatib, Z., Shannon, P., Kitchener, F.: ‘The effect of weather on free flow speed’, Transp. Res. Rec., 2001, 1776, pp. 6068 (doi: 10.3141/1776-08).
    3. 3)
      • 3. Munehiro, K., Takahashi, N., Asano, M.: ‘Using probe-car data to analyze winter road traffic performance in the urban sapporo area’. Proc. Fifth Int. Symp. on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service, Yokohama, Japan, 2006, pp. 349358.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Hranac, R., Sterzin, E., Krechmer, D., Rakha, H., Farzaneh, M.: ‘Empirical studies on traffic flow in inclement weather’. Publication No. FHWA-HOP-07-073, Federal Highway Administration, (U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2006).
    5. 5)
      • 5. Strong, C.K., Ye, Z., Shi, X.: ‘Safety effects of winter weather: The state of knowledge and remaining challenges’, Transp. Rev., 2010, 30, (6), pp. 677699 (doi: 10.1080/01441640903414470).
    6. 6)
      • 6. Pisano, P.A., Goodwin, L.C.: ‘Research needs for weather-responsive traffic management’, Transp. Res. Rec., 2004, 1867, pp. 127131 (doi: 10.3141/1867-15).
    7. 7)
      • 7. Cluett, C., Kitchener, F., Shank, D., Osborne, L., Conger, S.: ‘Integration of emergency and weather elements into transportation management centers’. Report No. FHWAHOP-06-090, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, February 2006.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Lindgren, R., Clair, S. St.: ‘Butte creek ice warning system’. Oregon Department of Transportation Research Report, Oregon Institute of Technology, August 2009.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Kyte, M., Shannon, P., Kitchener, F.: ‘Idaho storm warning system operational test-final report’. Report No. IVH9316 (601), National Institute for Advanced Transportation Technology, University of Idaho, December 2000.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Perrin, J., Coleman, B.: ‘Adverse visibility information system evaluation (ADVISE): Interstate 215 fog warning system’. UDOT Report No. UT-02.12, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Utah, June 2003.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Kumar, M., Strong, C.: ‘Comparative evaluation of automated wind warning systems’ (U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2006).
    12. 12)
      • 12. Krechmer, D., Krueger, G., Dunzo, M., Dale, J., Hedden, C.: ‘Benefit – cost evaluation techniques for rural its deployments’. 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, New York, 2008.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Schirokoff, A., Rama, P., Tuomainen, A.: ‘Country-wide variable speed limits?’. Paper presented at the XIII International Road Weather Conf. (SIRWEC), 2006.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Al-Ghamdi, A.: ‘Experimental evaluation of fog warning system’, Accident Anal. Prevention, 2007, 39, (6), pp. 10651072 (doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.05.007).
    15. 15)
      • 15. MacCarley, C.A., Ackles, C., Watts, T.: ‘A study of the response of highway traffic to dynamic fog warning and speed advisory messages’. Proc. 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2006.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Ye, Z., Strong, C.K., Shi, X., Conger, S., Huft, D.: ‘Benefit-cost analysis of maintenance decision support system’, Transp. Res. Rec., 2009, 2107, pp. 95103 (doi: 10.3141/2107-10).
    17. 17)
      • 17. Friar, S., Decker, R.: ‘Evaluation of a fixed anti-icing spray system’, Transp. Res. Rec., 1999, 1672, pp. 3441 (doi: 10.3141/1672-06).
    18. 18)
      • 18. Zhang, J., Das, D.K., Peterson, R.: ‘Selection of effective and efficient snow removal and ice control technologies for cold region bridges’, J. Civ. Environ. Archit. Eng., 2009, 3, (1), pp. 114.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Birst, S., Smadi, M.: ‘Evaluation of north Dakota's fixed automated spray technology systems’ (North Dakota Department of Transportation, Bismarck, ND, 2009).
    20. 20)
      • 20. Ye, Z., Shi, X., Strong, C., Greenfield, T.: ‘Evaluation of the effects of weather information on winter maintenance costs’, Transp. Res. Rec., 2009, 2107, pp. 104110 (doi: 10.3141/2107-11).
    21. 21)
      • 21. Strong, C., Shi, X.: ‘Benefit–cost analysis of weather information for winter maintenance: A case study’, Transp. Res. Rec., 2008, 2055, pp. 119127 (doi: 10.3141/2055-14).
    22. 22)
      • 22. Cluett, C., Kitchener, F.: ‘Implementation and evaluation of the sacramento regional transportation management center weather alert notification system’ (United States Department of Transportation, 2010).
    23. 23)
      • 23. Veneziano, D., Ye, Z.: ‘Evaluation of the fredonyer pass icy curve warning system’ (California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 2011).
    24. 24)
      • 24. Ye, Z., Veneziano, D., Turnbull, I.: ‘Safety effects of icy curve warning systems’, Transportation Research Record, 2012, 2318, pp. 8389 (doi: 10.3141/2318-10).

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address