Methods of evaluating electric vehicles from a user's perspective – the MINI E field trial in Berlin

Methods of evaluating electric vehicles from a user's perspective – the MINI E field trial in Berlin

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In the present study the authors propose a methodological framework for user studies on electric vehicles (EVs) and present first results from a 1-year field study conducted in the Berlin metropolitan area. The objective of the current field study is to develop, adjust and apply psychologically founded methods of assessing the acceptance of EVs in everyday use. Based on these methods, it will be possible to identify factors influencing the acceptance of EVs and to outline changes, for example in attitudes or behaviour, of participants during their participation in test trials. Accordingly, we identified four pillars that are decisive in user evaluation of EVs: mobility, human–machine interaction (HMI), traffic and safety implications and acceptance. Results from the first study period indicate that a great part of daily mobility needs are satisfied although range of EVs is limited. Attitudes towards EVs are predominantly positive. As expected, ecological aspects such as CO2 emissions play an important role in the evaluation of EVs.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • Research methods to assess the acceptance of EVs – experiences from an EV user study, Smart Systems Integration: Fourth European Conf. and Exhibition on Integr. Issues of Mini. Syst. – MEMS, MOEMS, ICs and Electr. Comp.
    4. 4)
      • E-mobility – Neues Geschäftsmodell im Öffentlichen Verkehr?
    5. 5)
      • Are there differences in the mobility patterns due to BEV?, Abstracts of the 27th Int. Congress of Appl. Psych.
    6. 6)
      • Mobilität in Deutschland: Ergebnisbericht [Mobility in Germany: results report]
    7. 7)
      • Paving the way for the electric vehicle (VR 2001:01)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • Learning from consumers: plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) demonstration and consumer education, outreach and market research program. 2007 alternative fuels incentive program
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Gärling, A., Johansson, A.: `An EV in the family', Paper presented at the Second KFB-Research Conf., June 1999, Lund
    14. 14)
      • , : `Quieter cars and the safety of blind pedestrians', Technical report DOT HS 811 304, 2010
    15. 15)
      • Cocron, P., Bühler, F., Franke, T., Neumann, I., Krems, J.: `The silence of electric vehicles – blessing or curse’?', Proc. 90th Ann. Meeting Transport. Res. Board, January 2011, Washington, DC,, accessed April 2011
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • Intelligent speed adaptation (ISA), Results of large-scale trials in Borlänge, Lidköping, Lund and Umea during the period 1999–2002
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • Prädiktoren der Akzeptanz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen, Fortschritte der Verkehrspsychologie
    25. 25)
      • Kurani, K.S., Heffner, R.R., Turrentine, T.S.: `Driving plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: reports from U.S. drivers of HEVs converted to PHEVs, circa 2006–2007', Research report UCD-ITS-RR-08-24 2007, 2010,, accessed 27 June
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • Estimating the demand for electric automobiles using fully disaggregated probabilistic choice analysis
    28. 28)
      • Turrentine, T., Kurani, K.: `The household market for electric vehicles: testing the hybrid household hypothesis – a reflexively designed survey of new-car-buying, multivehicle California households', Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-95-05, 1995
    29. 29)
      • Electric vehicles as a solution for green driving in the future? A field study examining the user acceptance of electric vehicles, Proc. European Conf. on Human Centred Des. Intell. Transport Syst.
    30. 30)
      • MINI E Fact Sheet:, accessed December 2010
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
      • Experiencing range in an electric vehicle – understanding psychological barriers
    33. 33)
      • SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale, Usability evaluation in industry
    34. 34)
      • Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
      • Popken, A.: `Drivers’ reliance on lane keeping assistance systems as a function of the level of assistance', 2009, Dissertation TU Chemnitz, , v3Online_geschuetzt.pdf, accessed July 2010
    38. 38)
    39. 39)
      • Bühler, F., Neumann, I., Cocron, P., Franke, F., Krems, J.F.: `Usage patterns of electric vehicles as a reliable indicator for acceptance? Findings from a German field study', Paper accepted to appear in Proc. 90th Annual Meeting Transport. Res. Board, January 2011, Washington, DC
    40. 40)
      • Van Westendorp, P.H.: `NSS-price sensitivity meter: a new approach to study consumer perception of prices', Venice ESO-MAR Congress, Marketing Research Society, 1976, Amsterdam
    41. 41)
      • Abschlussbericht MINI E Berlin powered by Vattenfall – Betrachtung der Aspekte Umweltbewusstsein, erneuerbare Energien, öffentliche Ladesäulen und gesteuertes Laden bei Elektromobilität
    42. 42)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address