Economic evaluation of intelligent transportation systems strategies: the case of the Oslo toll cordon

Economic evaluation of intelligent transportation systems strategies: the case of the Oslo toll cordon

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) projects often offer an effective solution for many transportation problems as compared to traditional solutions such as increasing road capacity to solve congestion problems. However, ITS projects are often not evaluated in economic terms either because methodologies are not available, or when they are, data become a limitation. Since economic assessment is the order of the day in the transportation sector, many potential ITS projects are losing terrain relative to alternative solutions. This study develops and demonstrates that economic evaluation of ITS projects in the road sector is possible. The authors use the Oslo toll cordon as a case example, where semi-automatic toll collection was replaced by a full-fledged ITS-based toll collection. The results show that ITS-based toll collection is highly profitable from an economic point of view. The reasons are that the ITS-based toll collection relieves congestion at toll points thereby leading to (i) time savings for road users, (ii) reduced noise and pollution associated with slow movement of vehicles at toll points, (iii) improvement of the city's landscape because toll booths and signposts are removed and (iv) reduced costs associated with operating tolls. The study urges ITS proponents to start using economic evaluation when assessing the merits of their projects.


    1. 1)
      • J. Li , D. Gillen , J. Dahlgren . (1999) Benefit–cost evaluation of the electronic toll collection system: a comprehensive framework and application’.
    2. 2)
      • H.W. Worral . Central Florida experiences significant benefits from electronic toll collection. ITE J. , 6 , 39 - 45
    3. 3)
      • G. Kim , K. Kang . (2004) Active DSRC application for ITS and economic valuation in Korea’.
    4. 4)
      • D. Loukakos . Electronic toll collection’.
    5. 5)
      • R.P. Maccubbin , B.L. Staples , F. Kabir . (2008) Intelligent transportation systems benefits, costs, deployment, and lessons learned: 2008 update.
    6. 6)
      • Transport for London: ‘Impacts monitoring’. Sixth Annual Report, London, UK, July 2008.
    7. 7)
      • J. Eliasson . A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system. Transp. Res. Part A , 4 , 468 - 480
    8. 8)
      • J. Odeck , B. Grue , T. Hamre , J. Rekdal , O. Díaz , G. Palomas , C. Jamet . (2004) From cordon toll to congestion pricing in Oslo – What are the benefits?.
    9. 9)
      • Bang, J., Flugsrud, K., Holtskog, S.: `Utslipp fra vegtrafikk ', Oppdatering av SFT-rapport 93:12., , [In English: Emissions from road traffic in Norway – method for estimation, input data and emission estimates. Updated SFT Report 93:12]'. SFT report 99:04, Oslo, 1999.
    10. 10)
      • O.I. Larsen , K. Østmoe . The experience of urban toll cordons in Norway. Lessons for the future. J. Transp. Econ. Policy , 3 , 457 - 471
    11. 11)
      • Vold, A., Minken, H., Fridstrøm, L.: `Road pricing strategies for the greater Oslo area', TØI Report 507/2001,, 2001, Oslo.
    12. 12)
      • H. Worral . (2008) Irregular behaviour. ETC and the infrequent customer’.
    13. 13)
      • P.J. Mackie , S. Jara-Diaz , A.S. Fowkes . The value of travel time savings in evaluation. Transp. Res. Part E , 91 - 106
    14. 14)
      • M. Welde . Hva er nytten av nye veger? [In English: What are the benefits of new roads?]. Samferdsel , 12 - 13
    15. 15)
      • A.S. Fowkes . A justification for awarding all time savings and losses, both small and large, equal value in scheme evaluation’.
    16. 16)
      • Mackie, P.J., Wardman, M., Fowkes, A.S., Whelan, G., Nellthorp, J., Bates, J.: `Values of travel time savings in the UK: summary report', (Report to the Department of Transport, 2003).
    17. 17)
      • G. Santos , B. Schaffer . Preliminary results of the London congestion charging scheme. Public Works Manage. Policy , 2 , 164 - 181
    18. 18)
      • K.B. Salling , D. Banister . Assessment of large transport infrastructure projects: the BCA-DK model. Transp. Res. Part A , 800 - 813

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address